Refuting Ken Ham's Heretical Teaching on Interracial Marriage

Ken Ham is teaching a very serious error, that lines up with the New Age Antichrist system.

80 White Guilt Propaganda Tactics Used by Media and Political Elites to Push for Third World Immigration and White Replacement

"[We wanted] to explore how people who had been brought up as white might become unwhite. ... The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Of course we expected bewilderment from people who still think of race as biology. ...

"Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed - not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed."

Sep.-Oct. 2002, Dr. Noel Ignatiev reprint from the book 'When Race Becomes Real' (2002) in Harvard Magazine, p. 30. (PDF) Dr. Ignatiev was a communist-antifa Students for a Democratic Society activist in the 1960s, who in the 1980s received preferential treatment to get a Harvard MA and Ph.D. Tutor at Harvard College 1986-1992, getting fired over his overly feverish opposition to a kosher toaster oven. Fellow at the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African-American Research, tied to the black elite Boule fraternity and "liberal CIA" foundations as Rockefeller 1, Ford 2 and Soros. 3

"I'm increasingly embarrassed to be a white male these days [host laughing hysterically], with what I see other white males say. But it just shows, with very few exceptions, like [Dick Cheney's daughter] Liz Cheney there are so few Republicans in Congress who value truth, honesty, and integrity. And so they'll continue to gaslight the country, the way Donald Trump did."

March 1, 2021 media appearance by John O. Brennan 4, the CIA director over 2013-2017 who visited Bilderberg in June 2017, where he was officially listed as a new "Senior Advisor, Kissinger Associates Inc.".

"It appears that young people throughout the world are going on strike and not having children [except in Africa]. ...

"[So] there will be 500 million working-age sub-Saharan Africans with a secondary or higher education [but] in Europe that will fall below 300 million... [This] will lead to the continued movement of people across borders for generations to come. I would argue this is a good thing...

"Vicious hate crimes have scarred societies from Norway to France... Police engage in racial profiling."

June 15, 2012, Sir Peter Sutherland speech at the 50th International Eucharistic Congress in Dublin, Ireland, as the UN Special Representative for International Migration 2006-2017. 5

However, did he speak in this capacity? Or more as the head of Goldman Sachs, BP and the WTO? Or as a Bilderberg steering committee member, the European chair of the Trilateral Commission, and the vice chair of the European Round Table of Industrialists?.

"Leaked emails show the pressure ... being applied to filter out white male recruits and fast-track women and ethnic minorities. It can also be revealed 31 white men are to receive £5,000 each to compensate them for being unfairly disadvantaged by the approach. ...

"Sky News first revealed last August that Group Captain Elizabeth Nicholl, the then head of RAF recruitment, had resigned in protest [after being pressured to] at what she, according to defence sources, deemed to be an "unlawful order" effectively to pause the selection of white male recruits on to training courses in favour of women and ethnic minorities to hit "impossible" diversity targets."

June 1, 2023, Sky News, 'Applicants seeking to join RAF described as 'useless white male pilots' in bid to hit 'impossible' diversity targets'. Referral: Aug. 22, 2022, Sky News, 'RAF recruitment head refused 'unlawful' order to 'prioritise women and ethnic minorities over white men', leaked email reveals'. The exact same policy is implemented in the USAF. 6

"Promoting hate based on ... race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status ... will be banned. ... While the rule on hate protects such groups ... the rule does not protect groups of people who are in the majority [i.e., white people]..."

June 29, 2020, controversial new policy at RedditHelp.com, 'Account and Community Restrictions: Promoting Hate Based on Identity or Vulnerability' (accessed: June 30, 2020; screenshot). One of many anti-white measures taken by Silicon Valley's elite. Reddit is by far the largest forum on the internet, basically designed to replace all other forums.

"We must realize that our [communist] party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. ... While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their [colonialist] exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life... With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites..."

1957 "Jewish communism" Congressional hoax by Jew-baiting (future) conspiracy author Eustace Mullins during the early Rockefeller-funded Civil Rights movement that caused some steer in 1958. Nevertheless a hoax that appears to be awfully accurate and prophetic, once the "Jewish communist" aspect is taken out. Mullins, apart from being supported by the ultraright Hunt oil fortune, was a key protege of the poet Ezra Pound, in turn befriended and supported by the similar pro-fascist, anti-communist 1954–1975 CIA counter-intelligence chief James Angleton. 7

"Bishop Paul Moore was a family friend who had known [Washington Post executive director] Ben Bradlee, [the murdered] Mary Meyer, and her [CIA and CFR] ex-husband, Cord Meyer, since the 1930s. ... Many were not prepared to forgive the murderer, and the less liberal members of the crowd were incensed at the minister [Paul Moore] for bringing politics into the chapel by trying to portray the alleged killer as a victim and the killing as an act perpetrated by poverty and injustice. ...

"[CIA counter-intelligence chief James] Angleton served as an usher at Mary's funeral, leading the mourners to their seats... Cord Meyer's closest friend and fellow Yale graduate, James Jesus Angleton [was present.] Cord Meyer was comforted at the funeral by [future CIA director] Richard Helms... Poet Reed Whittemore, a college friend of James Angleton's at Yale... was there with his wife. ... Kennedy aides Arthur Schlesinger and McGeorge Bundy [a Rockefeller friend since his youth] were also in the pews. ... Washington Post publisher Katharine Graham, recently widowed [from her CIA-tied husband] ... came to pay last respects."

Oct. 1964 funeral description of alleged JFK lover Mary Pinchot Meyer, who was murderd by a black person. Part of the "Rockefeller CIA" crowd was present, with a friendly bishop already spreading the globalist anti-white ("woke") theology 8 in a manner the West's population at large wouldn't be exposed until the 2010s.

Angleton and Whittemore were friends with and provided fellow Mussolini enthusiast Eza Pound with a magazine to spread his poetry. Pound was the mentor of Eustace Mullins who wrote the above 1957 "inflame the negro against whites" Congressional hoax. All of this points to the "Rockefeller CIA" network of the 1950s and 1960s being the origin of this white guilt agenda.

Years ago, ISGP produced a 'Media Psywar Manual: 54 Tactics the Mainstream and Alternative Media Use to Undermine Conspiracy Thinking'. Turns out that the media, as well as politicians and other elites, have been equally productive in developing tactics to silence critics of Third World immigration. In this article every single tactic the author has (repeatedly) come across over the years is listed. These tactics mainly come from the mainstream media, with overlapping examples from social media as Instagram and TikTok, Hollywood and activist groups, as well the content of "DEI (Diverse, Equitable, and Inclusive)-training" that we see employees of western governments and multinationals being unscientifically indoctrinated with.

In ISGP's article '"Liberal CIA" Owns Rock and Heavy Metal', the following brief, summarizing list has been presented, complete with countless examples of various (questionable) rock stars repeating them. Similarly ISGP documented dozens and dozens of statements along these lines from Hollywood stars. Most of the propaganda comes down to:

A lack of "love".
"Hate".
"Fear".
"Islamophobia".
"Unconscious racism" or "unconscious bias".
"A history of slavery".
"Systemic racism".
White people needing to "listen", "learn" and "educate themselves".
"Non-racism" isn't enough; white people need to police each other on it by becoming dedicated "anti-racists".
"Police brutality".

This propaganda is supplemented with tactics that range from race quotas at universities to the hiding of perpetrator's ethnicities in the media, especially in European countries. These tactics are all discussed in this article. So are terms as "cultural communism", "white replacement", and "white genocide". In that sense this article has grown into a really multifacited one that briefly explains almost every aspect of the globalist elite's war on its own citizens.

As for the above list of propaganda, prominent individuals literally all are reading from the same script, likely handed to them by their talent agencies, and much of it tying back to "liberal CIA"-funded NGOs as Soros and Ford. In turn, these NGOs revolve around CFR, Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission multinationals -- with the late David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger for the longest time at the center. It's hard to see how there can be any other point of origin. As demonstrated in various ISGP articles, this network also controls the media and has every politician in its pocket through the usual "controlled opposition" schemes. Anyone who doesn't go along, including media outlets, will get their online presence "downranked" by Bilderberg steering committee company Google, and increasingly also other search engines.

It should be clear that the only way to keep this blatant, ongoing, criminal conspiracy going is through massive psychological warfare campaigns to disinform and intimidate the masses into submission to the Third World immigration agenda. This psywar campaign basically is the equivalent of the one countering conspiracy thinking in western society.

White guilt: toxic, divisive and dangerous

It also should be clear that this agenda is extremely toxic, divisive and dangerous. Today in Vietnam, for example, there is not much animosity towards Americans, despite a long, brutal Vietnam War in which half the country was bombed into oblivion by the U.S. air force. 9 In no small part this lack of animosity is simply due do pragmatic views of everyday people, and due to a recognition that the Vietnamese have also been at war with the Japanese, Chinese, Cambodians, the French and each other 10, that nobody cares about weighty "communist versus capitalist" ideologies, and, very recognizable, that, "Most young people ... just want to have fun." 11 It's the same, of course, with Europeans realizing that Germans of today have nothing to do with what happened during World War II.

Now imagine western multinationals buying up the Vietnamese media and setting up "grassroots" activist groups through its "liberal CIA" foundations, and starting a media-activist campaign under the guise of "love" and "unity" to indoctrinate the Vietnamese into hating these "American colonialists" and demanding restitution from the Americans - while ignoring all other past "troublemakers"?

Yes, Satan 101. It couldn't be more destabilizing and divisive while claiming to do the opposite. And it appears the only reason such an agenda isn't implemented in Vietnam, is that it has no financial purpose for western multinationals. If the West is flooded with Vietnamese immigrants and increasingly resistant white people need to shut up about it, THEN such an agenda makes sense to implement - over here. And that really is the only thing that there is to this agenda: securing the long-term profits of globalist multinationals.

Powers and motives

Plenty of motives for Third World immigration and the related white guilt strategy can be found. These are all discussed in detail in ISGP's intro article. These motives are related to suppressing labor costs, neoliberal economic growth, and continuous stock market profits. They are generally tied in with multinationals funding globalist think tanks as Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission, Davos and the CFR, which automatically also brings in all the national governments, media, and activist groups this network controls.

Simply calling it "Satan" might be easier and more to the point though. What else would have these century-long agendas, as evidenced, for example, by the 1916 book 'The Passing of the Great Race'; sits invisibly at the center of hidden power on this Earth, wants to eliminate the most versatile, enlightened and free-thinking race; prefers the most primitive races on top, is looking to destroy families, and delete and mix up genders? Who else, what else, besides Satan?

It doesn't matter what exactly you believe. After reading this article, you will have a lot of facts about ethnic crime, and you'll have a good grasp of who is twisting and suppressing the facts surrounding them - which means you can fight them much more effectively from now on.

White guilt tactics: summary list

Race IQ denial - yet race quotas needed

The Kalergi Plan - The Ultimate
Secret Of The UN’s Agenda 21
Flashback To The Recent Future

By Patrick OCarroll
(copyright 2016, Patrick Ocarrol-all Rights Reserved)
Edited By Robert D. Morningstar
5-31-17

In Europe today and elsewhere, the dissolution of the Caucasian race has finally made it to the top of the power-elite’s prioritized task list. The most frightening aspect is that most people are not willing to accept that the premeditated destruction of Caucasians has been the plan for quite a long time. This nefarious plan has existed for well over half a century and got incorporated into the power-elite’s agenda in the 1950s. It is called The Kalergi Plan.

The detailed Kalergi Plan can be found in the writings of Richard Kalergi, the genocidal eugenicist who, in his book “Practical Idealism”, stated that he “wanted to completely destroy the face of Europe” and that “Europeans are to become Asiatic-Negroid mongrels.”

Although Soviet Europe’s public never consented to any cross-breeding plan, in the 1950s, Kalergi’s plan was adopted as Soviet Europe’s ethno-forming policy, intentionally designed to destroy the ethnicity of Europeans. The very same plan was reaffirmed by French President Nicolas Sarkozy when he told the conservative Brussels Journal in 2009:

“… if the French do not interbreed of their own free will, it will be necessary for the French regime to resort to even more forcible measures.”

Kalergi stated that future Europeans “would resemble ancient Egyptians,” but he was adamantly opposed to asking Europeans for their consent to cultural suicide, which is precisely what his plan entailed all along, and WHY IT HAS remained a secret to most people.

The biennial Kalergi Prize is an award bestowed in recognition of major concessions made toward achieving The Kalergi Plan. Its recipients included German Chancellor, Angela Merkel (what a “coincidence”, eh?), Helmut Kohl, Herman van Rompuy and Jean-Claude Juncker, but the exact concessions each recipient made in order to gain the award are kept secret from Soviet Europe’s duped public.

Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi

Soviet Socialist Architect of the Kalergi Plan

We are now at a stage in history when we can read the power-elite’s entire agenda online and then go and compare it to what is happening or else to what becomes history twenty years hence. Our separate races and cultures are all beautiful and we are called upon by the Creator to look after the Earth and retain our natural “patchwork quilt” of nations and varieties. Today, we are being socially engineered by the power-elite for glorious-soviet Technocracy and our separate races and cultures are being deliberately mixed in order to mitigate the potential backlash against world Sovietization through “Technocracy.”

There follows a brief analysis of today and tomorrow as the author sees it (some readers may find it reminiscent of the Leonard Cohen lyrics: “I’ve Seen The Future, Brother; It Is Murder”).

If you simply read the power-elite’s agenda which they have published openly for centuries, you can easily see how the following may soon unfold in accordance with that agenda. When some or all of the following milestones have come true, the public will finally realize that the agenda was real and that they have been lied to by mainstream news like no other generation before, but by that time it may be too late to reverse the damage done:

In 2016, preventable disease is rife in the western world, and it is on its way to bankrupting the middle-class. This is part of the published agenda whereby the middle-class is to be subjected to “asset-stripping” and destroyed, because the most effective method of destroying any country or people is to first destroy its middle-class. Once “asset-stripping” is complete, only two classes will remain: sharks and shark-food.

That is analogous to the agenda documents that call for gratuitous over-regulation of medium-sized companies to drive them out of business, so that only two classes of enterprise survive: sharks and shark-food. If an underprivileged person lands in hospital today, the medical commissars already have a secret points system that gauges what value that person has to society (those who largely consume have much lower scores than those who largely produce) so the white-coats know to slap a DNAR order (Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate) on that person so that he can be more easily euthanized if the opportunity arises. Ultimately, the only reason for maintaining preventable disease is for genocide. Obvious correctives would include placing higher taxes on junk-food (along the lines of the original idea behind taxing hard liquor) but no such corrective is favored by the power-elite because it goes against their published agenda for genocide.

In 2017, one anemic apple gives one-eighth the goodness (nutrition and minerals) of a 1937-apple, so you will need eight 2017-apples to match one 1937-apple. This one-to-eight-rule after eight decades also applies for anemic tomatoes, anemic carrots and other vegetables, and the power-elite regard this as a major point scored for Team Genocide against humanity. Vitamin supplements of any real potency have been outlawed. This is in accordance with the power-elite’s published agenda which calls for massively reduced nutrition in food, as also published in the genocidal UN’s Codex Alimentarius, which also calls for irradiating all agricultural produce under the guise of extending its shelf-life. Because food is medicine, the power-elite knew well that they first had to manipulate the food supply so as to more easily cull their herd.

Around 2020, if not sooner, the world financial crises the power-elite designed by means of ruthless deregulation, merciless money-printing and flattened yield curves has finally led to The Great Bail-In whereby most middle-class savings are bailed in to pay for the unhindered fraud committed by unregulated hedge funds and too-big-to-fail banks. The massive haircut leads to the biggest wealth-transfer in history. Those who used to have a bank account now pay by “smart”-card and every transaction is tracked for the Technocratic commissars. This is in keeping with the power-elite’s published plan to create a “cashless society” with a carbon-dioxide-based currency and a system of energy-credits, effectively replacing most currencies worldwide with a single world currency.

The most stable structure known to mankind is a pyramid but, after around the 1980s, the power-elite redesigned the financial system to resemble an upside-down pyramid (the most unstable structure), so they were able to create larger and larger financial crises each time until they could finally sovietize the entire system so as to make way for Technocracy.

Meanwhile, exorbitant taxes and fraudulent fees charged to owner-occupiers destroy all remnants of what was the middle-class. Like both communism and national-socialism, Technocracy’s agenda is to create top-down-driven collectivism and it is backed up by establishment-sponsored pseudoscience and non-science in the areas of economics, psychiatry, behavioral psychology, eugenics and genetics. System-critical dissidents or citizens who prefer free speech to political-correctness can easily be forced to toe the party line by curtailing the energy-credits paid onto their “smart”-cards at the start of each month.

In 2025, a 25-year-old female meets a 25-year-old male, both of whom were raised on GM-food and both 70-times-vaccinated microwave-phone users and consumers of water and soft drinks from plastic bottles. Although deceptive Hollywood love bells sound, the only thing the power-elite really care about is that the probability of these two ever having a single normal child is close to zero because, as everyone knows, genocidal vaccines, microwaves, GM-food and plastic bottles (laced with bisphenol-A) are all intended for sterilization. This is in keeping with the power-elite’s published agenda that calls for zero “wild breeding” after 2030, thereafter only the totalitarian Technocratic state is to have sole authority over the decision on who will be granted a “breeding license”.

After 2025, thanks mostly to genocidal vaccines, the number of autistic children in the USA exceeds the number of non-autistic children for the first time (this has already been conceded by the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and written extensively about by Dr Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientist at MIT). In this way, the power-elite make a mint through their deathcare system (which they orwellized to “healthcare”) while simultaneously achieving their depopulation agenda and increasing their overall control. The extra-profits each new autistic child brings them are published in BigPharma’s own internal reports. Who fell for this idea anyway, from livestock-farming, that vaccinating humans was ever “normal”?

Starting around 2040, the generation born after 2000 becomes the first generation since WW1 to predecease its parents. But most parents today simply do not care. If they did, they would be protesting or doing something to protect their children. Instead, they are brainwashed by new-age-positive-thinking slogans like “Go With The Flow”, “Go Along To Get Along” or “Don’t Worry Be Happy”.

This is in keeping with the power-elite’s published agenda which calls for a maximum world population of 500 million after a “century of change” (which is a power-elite inside joke meaning a century of genocide), and calls for high levels of ignorance about the genocidal methods being deployed to achieve it.

After 2050, human settlement is confined to Agenda 21’s “habitat areas” only, i.e. domed “smart-cities” (an “Orwellism” for dumb cities, smaller than their current sizes and covered by geodesic domes) where the remaining population can be more easily controlled or microwaved using the mobile-phone towers currently being completed worldwide for this purpose and, as usual, under the guise of a fake (ostensibly benevolent) purpose.

The food given to the remaining population is also to be manufactured in the same domed cities and not in the countryside, which, after 2050, is being subjected to “rewilding.”

This is part of the power-elite’s already published Agenda 21, signed in June 1992 by the bribed and compromised autocue-readers of 194 regimes, but never shouted from the rooftops by the compromised and controlled corporate dinosaur-media.

After 2075, countries, borders and even continental trading-blocs have all become irrelevant (because they were only ever a means to the same genocidal end). The only remaining populated areas on Earth are “world city states” (Agenda 21’s domed habitat areas or “sustainable” centers of civilization), with plenty of vegetation and wildlife in between. Only the power-elite and their top Technocratic nomenklatura will be permitted a house or a hunting-trip in the country. Tourism is all but dead (except voyaging by virtual reality) because ordinary people are to be permitted essential travel only.

Meanwhile, The Kalergi Plan, secretly adopted by Soviet Europe in the 1950s for mixing all races, has been extended to all “world city states,” which now feature a fairly homogenous mixed-race of people.

After 2100, the power-elite may have separated themselves from the lower-order people, as eugenicist Plato once boasted they would. Their glorious-soviet Technocratic system of apparatchiks controls the remaining people, who live in the “habitat areas”, get pacified by fluoride and other poisons in the air, water and food and are kept undernourished so as to more easily control them. The more sophisticated form of slavery advocated by countless power-elite moguls since the 1890s is now a reality and the power-elite’s version of “permanent peace” is now well-established, which means total control and predictability of all citizens of the Technocratic World Union (TWU).

In the proposed TWU, artificially intelligent robots, or automatonic Cyborgs will do most of the work.

The Truth does not fear investigation, so the reader has nothing to fear. In today’s world, most things worth knowing are couched in lies. If the Truth is news to you, then spread the word. Just like all generations without any exception, this generation too will have to choose to either pray for hope or fight for life to secure its freedom.

The Kalergi Plan - The Ultimate Secret of the UN’s Agenda 21

WHITE PEOPLE RALLY AROUND THE FAITH OF THE RISEN LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST!

Race is a reality. St Augustine, when commenting on Galatians 3:28, teaches that racial differences remain during this life, and they should be acknowledged and respected. The Church Father comments, "Difference of race or condition or sex is indeed taken away by the unity of faith, but it remains embedded in our mortal interactions, and in the journey of this life the apostles themselves teach that it is to be respected."

Dr. John R. Rice on Racial Matters - Excerpts from Dr. Rice, Here are More Questions Volume II (part one).

Dr. John R. Rice was a Baptist evangelist who pastored the Fundamentalist Baptist Tabernacle of Dallas, Texas. Rice was a dedicated soulwinner and an acclaimed author, most well known for his newspaper The Sword of the Lord.

Dr. Rice enumerates the following:

“Newspapers with a racial bias against white people do more to stir race hatred than other newspapers¹… I think it is generally not a happy marriage when members of any two races intermarry. whether it is white and black, or white and yellow, or yellow and black. People are happier to marry the people who have more or less the same ideas they have and where there is no friction, nothing to explain… It is wrong to suppose that segregation is altogether a matter of race prejudice against colored people… I believe it is true that God ‘hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation,’ that is, that nationalism is not wrong, that it is usually proper and convenient for people of similar race and language and custom to live in groups. There is some voluntary segregation because ‘birds of a feather flock together.’ And this, it seems, is the way God planned it. I do not think it generally wise for people of different races or of different backgrounds to intermarry, but as to their hearing the Gospel and being equal before the law, I think that God is no respecter of persons and that we ought not to be. I can prefer one man's company to another and that is not wrong. I can prefer my country to a foreign country and that is not wrong. It would be wrong, however, to abuse or mistreat those of another country and not give them their just rights.”

-Pages 403-405

¹John R. Rice was talking about media propagated anti-whiteism back in 1973!

SOURCE:

Dr. Rice, here are more questions ... : Rice, John R., 1895-1980 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Dr. John R. Rice on Racial Matters - Excerpts from Dr. Rice, Here are More Questions Volume II (part two).

Concerning the origin of the races:

“I believe it is quite evident that Adam, and then Noah, had in them all the elements that diversified the race, in color, size, looks, etc. I think black horses, white horses, bay horses, and other kinds all came from the original pair that were in the ark and they carried the genes that would diversify in their offspring; and so with dogs, and so with men. I do not believe that the color of Negroes, the pigment of their skin, grew as a matter of evolution to adjust to hot climates. I think they may have found themselves more compatible in a hot climate, but it has been proved by Mendel's Law (derived from experiments by that monk years ago) that the varieties that develop in a particular kind of species are not a result of evolution but that they were originally in the nature of the man or animal, and came out.”

-Pages 405-406

M. R. DeHaan on Interracial Marriage

Martin Ralph DeHaan was an American Bible teacher and medical doctor. Throughout the span of his life he pastored two Churches, the first of which being Calvary Reformed Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan. He would later go on to pastor the Calvary Undenominational Church. DeHaan is most well known for his book The Chemistry of the Blood, in which he uses his medical background to correlate science with the Holy Scriptures. In 1961, DeHaan released the second volume of his Dear Doctor: I Have a Problem series. In chapter seventeen he writes:

“The race problem is not a difficult one for me to answer, since I do not believe that the Bible teaches a completely integrated society. I believe we must recognize the fact that the Bible warns us against the ‘unequal yoke,’ which means that we are not to advocate marriage between believers and unbelievers, but also between people whose background and nationality are so incompatible that there is no hope of a happy union. I believe that God has divided the various races for a purpose. This is very graphically illustrated in the strict rules of separation which the Lord gave to Israel, forbidding them to have any relationship of integration with the Gentiles. Their worship and diet and customs were all designed to keep them a separate people… I do not believe in the intermarriage of those races which are so different temperamentally and emotionally that there is no hope of any blessing… I definitely do not believe in the intermarriage of Negroes and Whites. This is not because of discrimination, but is a matter of expedience and common sense. The temperament, background, habits, and sentiments of the two are so diverse as to make for misunderstanding and unhappiness… I feel Negroes and Whites should never intermarry, but where possible live in their own social and religious groups and churches.”

-Pages 263, 265-266

Dr. Gene Kim on Segregation

Gene Kim¹, who is the pastor of San Jose Bible Baptist Church, writes about segregation in his book: Ruckmanism Ruckus - A Biblical study on Ruckman Exposed and other criticisms against one of the most controversial men in Baptist history: Dr. Peter S. Ruckman

In the book he states the following:

“You do not realize that God is a Discriminator, Who ordained segregation, not integration, for all races. Genesis 11:1-9 talks about the people at the Tower of Babel trying to unite outside the will of God. Thus, God was so displeased that He decided to segregate them by confounding their universal language… It is a scriptural fact that God originally introduced segregation for all races, so they can live peaceably and seek after God (Acts 17:26-27)… Many people interpret Acts 17:26 as a verse for Integration. In reality, the verse is a text for segregation. Observe the verse. It says mankind is one as blood and different as races.

-Pages 88-89

¹Who is a Korean (descended from Shem).

A. Edwin Wilson was a southern Baptist minister who pastored various Churches in the great state of Texas, as well as, the Daytona Heights Baptist Church in Red Bank, Tennessee. In 1981 a book containing many of Wilson’s thoughts and theology was published under the title, The Selected Writings of A. Edwin Wilson from which we will now quotes from:

“In this day of strife, bigotry, misunderstanding, and confusion stemming out of integration, we are amazed at the number of preachers, seminary professors, and Bible teachers who appeal to the Scripture for justification of the integration of the races, thereby breaking or vaulting over barriers established by God. The Scriptures most commonly appealed to are as follows:
‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ Jesus’ (Gal, 3:28).
‘And hath raised us up together and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ
Jesus’ (Eph. 2:6).

Because the Lord says there is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor female, the supposition is, there is neither black nor white, and we are all one, in Christ. The integrationists fail to distinguish between what we are representatively, in Christ and what we are personally. The purpose, therefore, of this article is to try to enable you to distinguish between ‘representatively’ and ‘personally.’ Note in Eph. 2:6 that we are said to be seated together in heavenly places, IN Christ - not, WITH Christ… Representatively, in Christ, all distinctions of the human race are blotted out. Personally and actually a saved Jew still has Jewish physical and psychological characteristics, which distinguish him from a Gentile; and a Gentile, after being saved, still looks like one and acts like one… Representatively, in Christ, there is neither male nor female, but actually and personally when a male is saved he remains a male, and when a female is saved she is still a female; all those who say there is neither male nor female in Christ, continue to marry those of the opposite sex. We notice in churches and schools a difference is made by separate lounges being maintained; and men and women wear different types of clothing. Read Eph. 5:21-33 and Col. 2:18, 19, and you will see that God Almighty recognizes the difference between male and female and enjoins separate duties upon each… Representatively, in Christ, there is neither slave nor freeman, but actually and personally the Lord God Almighty recognizes bondage and slavery. In the church epistles (Ephesians and Colossians - epistles of highest Christian truth) instructions are brought to the slaves and to the slave owners, or masters (see Eph. 6:5-9; Col. 3:22-4:1)… Representatively, in Christ, there are no color differences, but actually and personally (we speak from personal experience as well as from the Word of God) when a black man becomes a Christian, his color does not change; when a white man becomes a Christian, his color does not change. The same is true of the red man and the yellow man… This general move toward blotting out all national characteristics and fusing all races into one people is Satanic in its origin and has no foundation or basis in the Word of God. Today, not only in this realm but in all realms of personal experience, we are faced with this question: Will we accept the Bible as the Word of God and be conformed to it?”

-pages 260-262

“We have noted in the above Scriptures that racial distinctions and national barriers (color, language, oceans, mountains, deserts, and rivers) all proceed from God. God divides and departmentalizes the human race, rather than communizing it. The idea of sinful, fallen man existing as one community or one family of human beings is foreign to the Bible and contrary to the ways of God, either in providence or redemption… There has developed throughout the world a philosophy that the melting, welding, and fusing of all races into one would solve all of the world's ills. If we could but do away with all those things which separate — color, languages, religions, customs — if all men would become one and we would have a great brotherhood of man and fatherhood of God (nowhere to be found in the Word of God), we would then have a Utopia. We are living in a day in which every effort is being put forth to unify mankind; and these efforts are forerunners of such as will be inaugurated by the Antichrist and will prove as disastrous and futile as those did at the time of the building of the tower of Babel on the plains of Shinar. Why did God divide and separate mankind into various ethnic groups, races, nations, and cultures? Why did God divide them according to the number of the children of Israel? In Acts 17:26, 27, we are told that God separated and divided by race, language, natural boundaries, chronological boundaries in order that they might seek after God, find Him, and be saved… All of the efforts to remove the color, natural, social, and moral barriers, which God has established between the races and nations, originate with Satan and are carried on today by his emissaries in the hope that he, Satan, can hinder and prevent the consummation of God's redemptive plan… ‘There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus’ (Gal. 3:28).
Here is a verse of Scripture that is being used today by Satan and religionists to do away with natural means of division and separation established by God. We are told today that in the light of this Scripture there is neither Jew, neither Gentile, neither are there free men and slaves. Also we are told that no longer is there any difference between male and female… To show the fallacy of the reasoning that we are all one in Christ and that segregation is thus anti-God, anti-Scriptural, and anti-social, I have but to call to your attention the fact that though Gal. 3:28 says there is neither male nor female in Christ, in most civilized and Christian nations you will find male and female segregated. They are segregated by different types of wearing apparel; the churches that are crying the loudest for integration have the male and female segregated in Sunday school classes, not only according to sex but according to age. These same churches also maintain different lounges for the men and women.”

-pages 263-264

"There are clear and sharp distinctions and differences between the Gentile nations and
ethnic groups and no amount of social engineering by modern man is going to be able to
change it. Races, cultures and nations are different and that was designed by God. There is
certainly nothing wrong with this variety of cultures and languages as it adds variety to the
world. A “uniculture” among men is not the will of God. But this is what man wants, as seen in
the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11- one language and one culture. Fallen man believes,
endorsed by Satan, that the rebellion against God can be better managed under a united
mankind of one government, economic system, religion, language and culture."

Pilgrim Way Commentary on Genesis

Why did God plan segregation of the races?

MARXIST LUCIFER KING

Jewish Author Advocated German Genocide in 1941

"Germans are a subhuman pestilence." The Nazis took this guide to German genocide by a Jew and changed the title.
For millions of Jews, Nazi-occupied Europe in 1941 was a house filling with gas fumes.
Why would an American Jew toss in a lighted match by advocating the sterilization & extermination of Germans? This was before the Jewish holocaust began; America wasn't even in the war. Supposedly a loner, Theodore Kaufman probably had wealthy backers.
His book was advertised in major newspapers. Moreover, although self-published, the book received favorable reviews in the MSM, which is unusual.

Kaufman had a Messianic vision of a "peaceful" World-Government run by Jews.

He implied that Germans were rivals to Jews in the field of world domination. The mass murder ("burnt sacrifice") of assimilated Jews was necessary to establish the NWO with Israel as the capital.

His book was a psyop that advanced this agenda.

"I believe that the Jews have a mission in life. They must see to it that the nations of the world get together in one vast federation." -- Theodore Kaufman

Compiled from Amazon Reviews and Wikipedia
from March 5, 2019by Henry Makow PhD

According to David Irving, Germany Must Perish!, a self-published book (July 1941) by Theodore N. Kaufman, prompted Goebbels to begin deportations of Berlin Jews to the Baltic countries where they were being slaughtered by the locals, (in revenge for Communist atrocities.)(1.15 min ff)
Theodore Kaufman, (1911-1986) owned a small advertising agency in New Jersey. There were about 350,000 Jews still in Germany and millions more in occupied Europe.

What would prompt a fellow Jew to place them in mortal jeopardy by advocating the sterilization of all German men under 65 and women under 45?

Kaufman wrote: "Concerning the males subject to sterilization: the army groups, as organized units, would be the easiest and quickest to deal with. Taking 20,000 surgeons as an arbitrary number and on the assumption that each will perform a minimum of 25 operations daily, it would take no more than one month, at the maximum, to complete their sterilization ... The balance of the male civilian population of Germany could be treated within three months. Inasmuch as sterilization of women needs somewhat more time, it may be computed that the entire female population of Germany could be sterilized within a period of three years or less." --- p.88

The back page cites the following endorsements: "A Plan For Permanent Peace Among Civilized Nations" -- New York Times; "A Sensational Idea" -- Time Magazine; "A Provocative Theory - Interestingly Presented" -- Washington Post.

Advertisements in the New York Times and New York Post described the book as: "A dynamic volume outlining a plan for the extinction of Germany and containing a map showing possible dissection and apportionment of its territory." The book accuses Germans of everything Jews are accused of -- text here.

(Theodore Kaufman. Did this man inspire the Holocaust?)

In an interview carried in the September 26, 1941, issue of The Canadian Jewish Chronicle, Kaufman defended his proposal: "I believe that the Jews have a mission in life. They must see to it that the nations of the world get together in one vast federation... Slowly but surely the world will develop into a paradise. We will have perpetual peace. And the Jews will do the most to bring about this confederation because they have the most to gain. But how can you get peace if Germany exists? The only way to win an eternal peace is to make the punishment of waging war more horrible than war itself. Human beings are penalized for murder, aren't they? Well, Germany starts all the wars of magnitude. Let us sterilize all Germans and wars of world domination will come to an end!"

NAZI REACTION
In "Last Train From Berlin" (1942) the late Howard K. Smith wrote that the Nazis were overjoyed by this propaganda windfall. According to Smith, at first, the Nazis merely sold Kaufman's pamphlet cheaply but eventually distributed a copy to every German family with their ration card. Kaufman's book gave the Nazis a propaganda windfall and even another excuse for eliminating the Jews of Germany.
"No man has ever done so irresponsible a disservice to the cause his nation is fighting and suffering for than Kaufman," Smith wrote. "His half-baked brochure provided the Nazis with one of the best light artillery pieces they have, for, used as the Nazis used it, it served to bolster up that terror which forces Germans who dislike the Nazis to support, fight and die to keep Nazism alive ..."

The Berlin daily newspaper Der Angriff of July 23, 1941, proclaimed: "Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People" and that Kaufman's was a work of "Old Testament Hatred." Extracts from the book appeared in the nationally-circulated weekly newspaper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.

The leaflet at left presents a reproduction of Kaufman's "8-Point Plan", and is then captioned: "German People! You now know what your eternal enemies plan to do. To stop their extermination-plan, there is only one thing to do: FIGHT, WORK, WIN!"

Pointing to Kaufman's writing, the Nazi message to the German people was a simple one: get them before they get you.

In September 1941, Julius Streicher published an essay in Der Sturmer that called Kaufman's book "the crazy thinking of [an] insane Jewish brain". He quoted Kaufman at length and then commented: "By destroying the German people, the Jew wants to stop up the spring from which, since the beginning, the world has always found its creative blood, the source of all that is beautiful, good and noble."

After the US entered World War II, Adolf Hitler claimed mass sterilization of German male youth was a "primary" American goal:

"The Jewish president of the American Federation of Peace is no anonymous individual, no fanatic rejected by world Jewry, no mentally ill crackpot, but rather a leading and widely known Jewish personality in the United States. He belongs to the so-called Roosevelt Brain Trust, which provides intellectual and political education and advice to the American President. "It is therefore beyond question that his book and its demand that 'Germany must perish' corresponds to the official opinion of the leading circles of world plutocracy."

When the Jews of Hanover were evicted on September 8, 1941, the local authorities cited Kaufman's book. Kaufman responded: "This is just a flimsy pretext for another of the innate cruelties of the German people ... I don't think it was my book that prompted this barbarity. They employed every possible German cruelty against the Jews long before my book was published."

The German philosopher and historian Ernst Nolte argues that the German reaction to Germany Must Perish! supports his contention that World War II was a genuine response to German fears of a worldwide Jewish plot.

Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels wrote in in his diary: "This Jew did a real service for the enemy [German] side. Had he written this book for us, he could not have made it any better."
On Sept 1, 1941, the Nazis required German Jews to wear a yellow badge on their clothing. Goebbels claimed that Hitler authorized this step after reading Germany Must Perish!.

From their safe refuge, American Jews had no compunction about endangering fellow Jews they claimed to care about. This was part of a larger pattern of Illuminati (Zionist) Jews enabling the holocaust. Zionists were complicit in the holocaust, and then reaped the moral capital from their crime.
-------------------------------Note: An earlier provocation that endangered Germany's Jews. "The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." - Mr. Samuel Untermeyer (1933)

Jewish Author Advocated German Genocide in 1941 - henrymakow.com

Excerpted from the Green Book by Mummer Qaddafi (The Social Basis of the Third Universal theory)

(I included this on the page because I believe it is actually quite Biblical, although Qaddafi died a lost unsaved Muslim. His insights into nations, tribes and family are evidence of the law being written on the conscience. Islam which is a satanic cult like Mormonism or Talmudic Judaism also claims to be Abrahamic and therefore does steal some concepts from Biblical Christianity!

THE FAMILY

To the individual, the family is more important than the state. Mankind acknowledges the individual as a human being, and the individual acknowledges the family, which is his cradle, his origin, and his social umbrella. According to the law of nature, the human race is the individual and the family, but not the state. The human race has neither relations nor anything else to do with the state, which is an artificial political, economic, and sometimes military, system. The family is like a plant, with branches, stems, leaves and blossoms. Cultivating nature into farms and gardens is an artificial process that has no relevance to the plant itself. The fact that certain political, economic or military factors tie a number of families into one state does not necessarily link this system or its organization with humanity. Similarly, any situation, position or proceeding those results in the dispersion, decline or loss of the family is inhuman, unnatural and oppressive, analogous to any procedure, measure or action that destroys a plant and its branches and withers its leaves and blossoms.

Societies in which the existence and unity of the family become threatened due to any circumstance, are similar to fields whose plants experience uprooting, drought, fire, weathering or death. The blossoming garden or field is one whose plants grow, blossom and pollinate naturally. The same holds true of human societies. The flourishing society is that in which the individual grows naturally within the family and the family within society. The individual is linked to the larger family of humankind like a leaf is to a branch or a branch to a tree. They have no value or life if they are separated. The same holds true for individuals if they are separated from their families - the individual without a family has no value or social life. If human society reaches the stage where the individual lives without a family, it will then become a society of tramps, without roots, like artificial plants.

THE TRIBE

A tribe is a family which has grown as a result of procreation. It follows that a tribe is an enlarged family. Similarly, a nation is a tribe which has grown through procreation. The nation, then, is an enlarged tribe. The world is a nation which has been diversified into various nations. The world, then, is an enlarged nation. The relationship which binds the family also binds the tribe, the nation, and the world. However, it weakens with the increase in number. The essence of humanity is that of nation, the essence of nation is that of the tribe, and the essence of the tribe is that of family. The degree of warmth involved in the relationship decreases proportionately with the increase in size of the social unit. This is an indisputable social fact denied only by those who are ignorant of it.

The social bond, cohesiveness, unity, intimacy and love are stronger at the family level than at the tribal level, stronger at the tribal level than that of the nation, and stronger at the level of the nation than that of the world.

Advantages, privileges, values and ideals based on social bonds exist where those bonds are natural and undoubtedly strong. They are stronger at the family level than at the level of the tribe, stronger at the tribal level than that of the nation, and stronger at the nation's level than that of the world. Thus, these social bonds, benefits, advantages and ideals associated with them are lost wherever the family, the tribe, the nation or humankind vanish or are lost. It is, therefore, of great importance for human society to maintain the cohesiveness of the family, the tribe, the nation and the world in order to benefit from the advantages, privileges, values and ideals yielded by the solidarity, cohesiveness, unity, intimacy and love of family, tribe, nation and humanity.

In the social sense, the familial society is better than that of the tribe, the tribal society is better than that of the nation, and the society of the nation is better than world society with respect to fellowship, affection, solidarity and benefits.

THE MERITS OF THE TRIBE

Since the tribe is a large family, it provides its members with much the same material benefits and social advantages that the family provides for its members, for the tribe is a secondary family. What must be emphasized is that, in the context of the tribe, an individual might indulge himself in an uncouth manner, something which he would not do within the family. However, because of the smallness in size of the family, immediate supervision is not exercised, unlike the tribe whose members continually feel that they are under its supervision. In view of these considerations, the tribe forms a behavior pattern for its members, developing into a social education which is better and more noble than any school education. The tribe is a social school where its members are raised to absorb the high ideals which develop into a behavior pattern for life. These become automatically rooted as the human being grows, unlike classroom education with its curricula - formally dictated and gradually lost with the growth of the individual. This is so because it is formal and compulsory and because the individual is aware of the fact that it is dictated to him.

The tribe is a natural social "umbrella" for social security. By virtue of social tribal traditions, the tribe provides for its members collective protection in the form of fines, revenge and defense; namely, social protection. Blood is the prime factor in the formation of the tribe, but it is not the only one because affiliation is also a factor in the formation of the tribe. With the passage of time, the differences between the factors of blood and affiliation disappear, leaving the tribe as one social and physical unit, though it remains fundamentally a unit of blood in origin.

THE NATION

The nation is the individual's national political "umbrella"; it is wider than the social "umbrella" provided by the tribe to its members. Tribalism damages nationalism because tribal allegiance weakens national loyalty and flourishes at its expense. In the same way, loyalty to the family flourishes at the expense of tribal loyalty and weakens it. National loyalty is essential to the nation but, at the same time, it is a threat to humanity.

The nation in the world community is similar to the family in the tribe. The more the families of a tribe feud and become fanatical, the more the tribe is threatened. The family is threatened when its individual members feud and pursue only their personal interests. Similarly, if the tribes of a nation quarrel and pursue only their own interests, then the nation is undermined. National fanaticism expressed in the use of force against weak nations, or national progress, which is at the expense of other nations, is evil and harmful to humanity. However, strong individuals who have self-respect and are aware of their own individual responsibilities are important and useful to the family, just as a strong and respectable family, which is aware of its importance, is socially and materially beneficial to the tribe. Equally useful to the whole world is a progressive, productive and civilized nation. The national political structure is damaged when it descends to a lower social level, namely, the family and tribe, and attempts to act in their manner and to adopt their views.

The nation is an enlarged family which has passed through the period of the tribe and through the diversification of tribes that have branched out from one common source. It also includes those members who affiliated themselves with its destiny. The family, likewise, grows into a nation only after passing through the period of the tribe and its diversification, as well as through the process of affiliation which comes about as a result of interaction between various communities in a society. Inevitably, this is achieved over a long period of time. Although the passage of time creates new nations, it also helps to fragment old ones. Common origin and common destiny, through affiliation, are the two historic bases for any nation, though origin ranks first and affiliation second. A nation is not defined only by origin, even though origin is its basis and beginning. In addition to its origin, a nation is formed by human affiliations through the course of history which induce a group of people to live in one area of land, develop a common history, form one heritage, and face the same destiny. A nation, irrespective of blood bond, is formed through a sense of belonging and a shared destiny.

But why has the map of the earth witnessed great nations that have disappeared to give way to the rise of other nations?

Let us see. The family is indisputably a social structure rather than a political one. The same applies to the tribe because it is a family which has reproduced and enlarged itself to become many families. Equally true, the nation is a tribe after it has grown and its branches have multiplied and become tribes.

The nation is also a social structure whose bond is nationalism; the tribe is a social structure whose bond is tribalism; the family is a social structure whose bond is family ties; and global society is a social structure whose bond is humanity. These facts are self-evident. There is then the political structure of states which form the political map of the world. But why does the map of the world keep changing from one age to the next? The reason is that political structures may, or may not, be consistent with social structures. When political structure and social reality are congruent, as in the case of the nation-state, it lasts and does not change. If a change is forced by external colonialism or internal collapse, it reappears under the banner of national struggle, national revival or national unity. When a political structure embraces more than one nation, its map will be torn up by each nation, gaining independence under the banner of its respective nationhood. Thus, the maps of the empires which the world has witnessed have been torn up because they were composed of a number of nations. When every nation clings strongly to its national identity and seeks independence, political empires are torn up and their components revert to their social origins. This is evidently clear through the history of the world when reviewed through the ages.

But why were those empires made up of different nations? The answer is that the state is not a social structure like the family, the tribe and the nation, but, rather, a political entity created by several factors, the simplest and foremost of which is nationalism. The national state is the only political form which is consistent with the natural social structure. Its existence lasts, unless it becomes subject to the tyranny of another stronger nationalism or unless its political structure, as a state, is affected by its social structure in the form of tribes, clans and families. A political structure is corrupted if it becomes subservient to the sectarian social structure of the family, tribe, or sect and adopts its characteristics.

Religious, economic and military factors also contribute to form a state which differs from the basic, national state.

A common religion, as well as the requirements of economics or military conquests, may create a state which embraces several nations. Thus, in one age, the world witnesses a state or an empire which will disintegrate in another age. When the spirit of nationalism emerges stronger than religious loyalties, or conflict flares up between different nationalisms which were brought together, for example, by one religion, each nation becomes independent and recovers its social structure. That empire, then, disappears. The role of religion resurfaces when the religious spirit emerges stronger than the spirit of nationalism. Consequently, the various nationalisms are unified under the banner of religion until the national role appears once again, and so on.

All states which are composed of several nationalities for whatever reason - religion, economics, military power or man-made ideology will be destroyed by national conflict until each nation obtains its independence, because the social factor will inevitably triumph over the political factor.

Despite political circumstances which necessitate the establishment of a state, the basis for the life of individuals is the family, and extends to the tribe, the nation, and eventually to all humanity. The essential factor is the social factor. Nationalism is a permanent factor. Stress should be laid on social reality and family care in order to bring up an integrated well-educated human. Care should then be given to the tribe as a social "umbrella" and a natural social school which develops its members at the post-family stage. The nation then follows. The individual learns social values mainly from the family and the tribe which form a natural social structure created by no particular individual. Taking care of the family is in the interest of the individual just as the care of the tribe is in the interest of the family, the individual and the nation; it is part of the national identity. The social factor, the national factor, is the real constant dynamic force behind history.

To disregard the national bond of human communities and to establish a political system in contradiction to social reality establishes only a temporary structure which will be destroyed by the movement of the social factor of those groups, i.e., the national integrity and dynamism of each community.

These facts are innate in the life of humankind and are not intellectual conjectures. Every individual in the world should be aware of these realities and work accordingly so that his actions may be worthwhile. To avoid deviation, disorder and damage in the life of human groups which are the result of a lack of understanding and respect for these principles of human life, it is necessary to know these proven realities.

WOMAN

It is an undisputed fact that both man and woman are human beings. It follows, as a self-evident fact, that woman and man are equal as human beings. Discrimination against woman by man is a flagrant act of oppression without justification for woman eats and drinks as man eats and drinks; woman loves and hates as man loves and hates; woman thinks, learns and comprehends as man thinks, learns and comprehends. Woman, like man, needs shelter, clothing, and transportation; woman feels hunger and thirst as man feels hunger and thirst; woman lives and dies as man lives and dies.

But why are there men and women? Human society is composed neither of men alone nor of women alone. It is made up naturally of men and women. Why were not only men created? Why were not only women created? After all, what is the difference between men and women or man and woman? Why was it necessary to create men and women? There must be a natural necessity for the existence of man and woman, rather than man only or woman only. It follows that neither of them is exactly like the other, and the fact that a natural difference exists between men and women is proved by the created existence of men and women. This necessarily means that there is a role for each one of them corresponding to the difference between them. Accordingly, there must be different prevailing conditions for each one in order that they perform their naturally different roles. To comprehend these roles, we must understand the difference in the created nature of man and woman, that is, the natural difference between the two.

Women are females and men are males. According to gynecologists, women menstruate every month or so, while men, being male, do not menstruate or suffer during the monthly period. A woman, being a female, is naturally subject to monthly bleeding. When a woman does not menstruate, she is pregnant. If she is pregnant, she becomes, due to pregnancy, less active for about a year, which means that all her natural activities are seriously reduced until she delivers her baby. When she delivers her baby or has a miscarriage, she suffers puerperium, a condition attendant on delivery or miscarriage. As man does not get pregnant, he is not liable to the conditions which women, being female, suffer. Afterwards a woman may breast-feed the baby she bore. Breast-feeding continues for about two years. Breastfeeding means that a woman is so inseparable from her baby that her activity is seriously reduced. She becomes directly responsible for another person whom she assists in his or her biological functions; without this assistance that person would die. The man, on the other hand, neither conceives nor breast-feeds. End of gynecological statement!

All these innate characteristics form differences because of which men and women are not the same. These characteristics in themselves are the realities that define male and female, men and women; they assign to each of them a different role or function in life. This means that men cannot replace women in carrying out these functions. It is worthy of consideration that these biological functions are a heavy burden, causing women great effort and suffering. However, without these functions which women perform, human life would come to an end. It follows that it is a natural function which is neither voluntary nor compulsory. It is an essential function, without which human life would come to a complete halt.

Deliberate interventions against conception form an alternative to human life. In addition to that, there exists partial deliberate intervention against conception, as well as against breast-feeding. All these are links in a chain of actions in contradiction to natural life, which is tantamount to murder. For a woman to kill herself in order not to conceive, deliver and breast-feed is within the realm of deliberate, artificial interventions, in contradiction with the nature of life epitomized by marriage, conception, breast-feeding, and maternity. They differ only in degree.

To dispense with the natural role of woman in maternity - nurseries replacing mothers - is a start in dispensing with the human society and transforming it into a merely biological society with an artificial way of life. To separate children from their mothers and to cram them into nurseries is a process by which they are transformed into something very close to chicks, for nurseries are similar to poultry farms into which chicks are crammed after they are hatched. Nothing else would be as appropriate and suitable to the human being and his dignity as natural motherhood. Children should be raised by their mothers in a family where the true principles of motherhood, fatherhood and comradeship of brothers and sisters prevail, and not in an institution resembling a poultry farm. Even poultry, like the rest of the members of the animal kingdom, need motherhood as a natural phase. Therefore, breeding them on farms similar to nurseries is against their natural growth. Even their meat is artificial rather than natural. Meat from mechanized poultry farms is not tasty and may not be nourishing because the chicks are not naturally bred and are not raised in the protective shade of natural motherhood. The meat of wild birds is more tasty and nourishing because they are naturally fed. As for children who have neither family nor shelter, society is their guardian, and only for them, should society establish nurseries and related institutions. It is better for them to be taken care of by society rather than by individuals who are not their parents.

If a test were carried out to discover whether the natural propensity of the child is towards its mother or the nursery. the child would opt for the mother and not the nursery. Since the natural tendency of a child is towards its mother, she is the natural and proper person to give the child the protection of nursing. Sending a child to a nursery in place of its mother is coercive and oppressive and against its free and natural tendencies.

Natural growth for all living things is free and healthy growth. To substitute a nursery for a mother is coercive action against free and sound growth. Children who are shipped off to a nursery are consigned compulsorily or by exploitation and simple-mindedness. They are driven to nurseries purely by materialistic, and not by social, considerations. If coercion and childish simple-mindedness were removed, they would certainly reject the nursery and cling to their mothers. The only justification for such an unnatural and inhuman process is the fact that the woman is in a position unsuitable to her nature, i.e., she is compelled to perform duties which are unsocial and anti-motherhood.

A woman, whose created nature has assigned to her a natural role different from that of man, must be in an appropriate position to perform her natural role.

Motherhood is the female's function, not the male's. Consequently, it is unnatural to separate children from their mothers. Any attempt to take children away from their mothers is coercion, oppression and dictatorship. The mother who abandons her maternity contradicts her natural role in life. She must be provided with her rights, and with conditions which are non-coercive, unoppressive and appropriate to her natural role. She can then fulfill her natural role under natural conditions. If the woman is forced to abandon her natural role regarding conception and maternity, she falls victim to coercion and tyranny. A woman who needs work that renders her unable to perform her natural function is not free and is compelled to work by need, and "in need, freedom is latent".

Among suitable and even essential conditions which enable women to perform their natural role, which differs from that of men, are those very conditions which are proper for a human being who is incapacitated and burdened with pregnancy. Bearing another human being in her womb lessens her physical ability. It is unjust to place such a woman, in this stage of maternity, into circumstances of physical work incompatible with her condition. For pregnant women to perform such physical work is tantamount to punishment for their betrayal of their maternal role; it is the tax they pay for entering the realm of men, which is naturally alien to their own.

The belief, even if it is held by a woman, that she carries out physical labour of her own accord, is not, in fact, true. She performs the physical work only because a harsh materialistic society has placed her (without her being directly aware of it) into coercive circumstances. She has no alternative but to submit to the conditions of that society, even though she may think that she works of her own accord. In fact, the alleged basis that "there is no difference in any way between men and women", deprives woman of her freedom.

The phrase "in any way" is a monstrous deception. This idea will destroy the appropriate and necessary conditions which constitute the privilege which women ought to enjoy apart from men in accordance with their distinctive nature, and upon which their natural role in life is based.

To demand equality between man and woman in carrying heavy weights while the woman is pregnant is unjust and cruel. To demand equality between them in fasting and hardship while she is breast-feeding is unjust and cruel. To demand equality between them in any dirty work which stains her beauty and detracts from her femininity is unjust and cruel. Education that leads to work unsuitable for her nature is unjust and cruel as well.

There is no difference between men and women in all that concerns humanity. None of them should marry the other against his or her will, or divorce without a just trial or mutual agreement. Neither should a woman remarry without such agreement or divorce, nor a man without divorce or consent. The woman is the owner of the house because it is one of the suitable and necessary conditions for a woman who menstruates, conceives, and cares for her children. The female is the owner of the maternity shelter, which is the house. Even in the animal world, which differs in many ways from that of the humans, and where maternity is also a duty according to nature, it is coercive to deprive the female of her shelter and the offspring of their mother.

Woman is female. Being female means she has a biological nature that is different from that of the male. The female's biological nature, differing as it does from that of the males, has imparted to women characteristics different from those of men in form and in essence. A woman's anatomy is different from that of a man's just as the female differs in plants and animals. This is a natural and incontrovertible fact. In the animal and plant kingdoms, the male is naturally created strong and aggressive, while the female is created beautiful and gentle. These are natural and eternal characteristics innate to living creatures, whether they are called human beings, animals or plants.

In view of his different nature and in line with the laws of nature, the male has played the role of the strong and striving not by design, but simply because he is created that way. The female has played the role of the beautiful and the gentle involuntarily because she was created so. This natural rule is just, partly because it is natural, and partly because it is the basic rule for freedom. All living creatures are created free and any interference with that freedom is coercion. Not to adhere to these natural roles and to lack concern for their limits amounts to a wanton act of corruption against the values of life itself. Nature has been designed to be in harmony with the inevitability of life, from what is being to what will become. The living creature is a being who inevitably lives until it is dead. Existence between the beginning and the end of life is based on a natural law, without choice or compulsion. It is natural. It is natural freedom.

In the animal, plant and human realms, there must be a male and a female for life to occur from its beginning to its end. Not only do they exist but they have to exercise, with absolute efficiency, the natural role for which they have been created. If their role is not being efficiently performed, there must be some defect in the organization of life caused by historical circumstances. This is the case of societies almost everywhere in the world today as they confuse the roles of men and women and endeavor to transform women into men. In harmony with nature and its subsequent purpose, men and women must be creative within their respective roles. To resist is retrogressive; it is directed against nature and destroys the basis of freedom, for it is hostile to both life and survival. Men and women must perform, not abandon, the roles for which they are created.

Abandoning their role, or even a part of it, only occurs as a result of coercive conditions and under abnormal circumstances. The woman who rejects pregnancy, marriage, beautification and femininity for reasons of health abandons her natural role in life under these coercive conditions of ill health. The woman who rejects marriage, pregnancy or motherhood because of work abandons her natural role under similar coercive conditions. The woman who rejects marriage, pregnancy or maternity without any concrete cause abandons her natural role as a result of a coercive and morally deviant circumstances. Thus, abandoning the natural roles of female and male in life can only occur under unnatural conditions which are contrary to freedom and are a threat to survival. Consequently, there must be a world revolution which puts an end to all materialistic conditions hindering women from performing their natural role in life and so drives them to carry out men's duties in order to attain equal rights. Such revolution will inevitably take place, particularly in industrial societies, as a response to the instinct of survival, even without any instigator of revolution. (ARMY OF THE LORD NOTES: The World Revolution, that Mummer Qaddafi speaks of here can only come about by the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to dethrone the Antichrist. Though we can temporarily fix things with temporal revivals, reformations and revolutions. Man in the 1000 Year Kingdom Age will live in a great era of prosperity and plenty, there will be little if any need for industrialized living. Though there may very well be great scientific and technological advances with Jesus Christ, God in flesh ruling from the New Jerusalem.)

All societies today look upon women as little more than commodities. The East regards her as a commodity to be bought and sold, while the West does not recognize her femininity.

Driving woman to do man's work is a flagrant aggression against the femininity with which she is naturally provided, and which defines a natural purpose essential to life. Man's work obscures woman's beautiful features which are created for female roles. They are like blossoms which are created to attract pollen and to produce seeds. If we did away with the blossoms, the role of plants in life would come to an end. The natural embellishment in butterflies and birds and animal females exists to that natural vital purpose. If a woman carries out men's work, she risks being transformed into a man, abandoning her role and her beauty. A woman has full right to live without being forced to change into a man and to give up her femininity.

Physical structure, which is naturally different in men and women, leads to differences in the functions of the organs, which in turn leads to differences in the psyche, mood, emotions, as well as in physical appearance. A woman is tender; a woman is pretty; a woman weeps easily and is easily frightened. In general, women are gentle and men are aggressive by virtue of their inbred nature.

To ignore natural differences between men and women and to mix their roles is an absolutely uncivilized attitude, hostile to the laws of nature, destructive to human life, and a genuine cause for the wretchedness of human social life.

Modern industrial societies, which have made women adapt to the same physical work as men at the expense of their femininity and their natural role in terms of beauty, maternity and serenity, are materialistic and uncivilized. To imitate them is as stupid as it is dangerous to civilization and humanity.

The question, then, is not whether women should or should not work, for this is a ridiculous materialistic presentation of the case. Work should be provided by the society to all able members who need work - men and women on the condition that individuals work in their own fields and not be coerced into carrying out unsuitable work.

For children to find themselves under adult working conditions is unjust and dictatorial. It is equally unjust and dictatorial for women to find themselves under the working conditions of men.

Freedom means that every human being gets proper education which qualifies him or her for the work which suits him or her. Dictatorship means that human beings are taught that which is not suitable for them and are forced to do unsuitable work. Work which is appropriate to men is not necessarily appropriate to women, and knowledge that is proper for children does not necessarily suit adults.

There is no difference in human rights between man and woman, the child and the adult, but there is no absolute identity between them as regards their duties.

MINORITIES

There are only two types of minorities. One of them belongs to a nation which provides it with a social framework, while the other has no nation and forms its own social framework. The latter is the one that forms one of the historic groups which eventually constitute a nation by virtue of a sense of belonging and a common destiny.

It is now clear that such a minority has its own social rights. Any encroachment on these rights by any majority is an act of injustice. Social characteristics are inherent and cannot be given or taken away. The political and economic problems of minorities can only be solved within a society controlled by the masses in whose hands power, wealth and arms should be placed. To view the minority as a political and economic substratum is dictatorial and unjust.

Gaza and Muslim Immigration to Europe

We are trying our best to figure out – why is Jewry so keen to import as many Muslims to Europe and USA as possible, and at the same time prepare the Gaza genocide? Do they do it out of sheer idealism? Out of compassion (hard to believe)? Or out of silliness? Could it be that this calculating people didn’t take into account that Muslims might react to genocide against Palestinians? Granted, Europeans and Americans did their fair share of protesting, but Jews knew they could shut down the Goyim any time they wanted simply by uttering the magic Jewish spell “Holocaust – Auschwitz”.

Yet Jews understand better than anyone that their “fellow Semites” from the Middle East have not accepted the yoke of Holocaust Guilt. Jews are more aware than anyone that Muslims still chafe over the fact that their Palestinian brothers have been kept in an “open air concentration camp” for the last 50 years. So how can we explain the apparent tactical error when the ADL and other Jewish organizations twisted the arms of European and American leaders to accept hordes of fighting age Muslims just before an Israeli incursion into Gaza? Surely no! They do not make such mistakes!

When on Friday in Dublin a Muslim émigré from Algeria stabbed an Irish family and incited an anti-Muslim pogrom, we finally got the missing piece of this puzzle. I was waiting for “the rest of the story”, and it was unveiled at a crucial point in the drama – just as Dublin demonstrated en masse against the brutal murder of Gaza children, just when the Irish parliament threatened to expel the Israel ambassador, just as reports of anti-Semitism reached new highs. Just then it seemed that the Jews were beset from all sides, and that the whole world was against them. Of course, in every good story the darkest tidings come just before the dawn.

Jews are professional victims. They are good at it. They are willing to play the bad guy, but only in stories where Jewry is eventually vindicated and expendable Jews martyred. Jewish leaders believe that revenge is best served cold. This answers the question of why they brought Muslim refugees to Europe and America in the first place. Unneeded, unwanted, unrequested (so much for democracy), at a time of growing poverty and debt, the economies bankrupt and populations largely jobless, this is the precise moment that the Jews ostentatiously dumped armies of Muslims into the West.

“I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.” — Barbara Lerner Spectre, a founding director of Paideia, The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden.

Video Link

Of course the fury of the hapless natives will be focused upon the Muslim immigrants. Of course the hapless Muslims will resent this. This conflict is not only natural, it is eminently predictable. And of course, wherever reality falls short of the predetermined narrative, the media can be counted on to fill in the gaps.

It’s not difficult to find a Muslim refugee of disturbed mind, to hand him a knife and push him out the door to amok attack. If he didn’t exist, then the Jews would have to create him. Muslim Golems do it with panache.

A Palestinian man, Sirhan Sirhan is doing life in a US jail for the alleged assassination of Robert Kennedy (a brother of JFK), even though RFK’s son, Robert Kennedy Jr, is convinced of his innocence. Most people understand that Sirhan was framed by an international cabal of skilled dealers in narratives. Practically no one in the world believes that Sirhan committed the murder, and yet our wiki-histories still maintain the fiction as though no “conspiracy theory” could stand in the face of an official report. For 55 years, they have held the facts in a kind of fog, admitted and yet plausibly denied. Compared with such imperial stratagems, the stabbing in Dublin is amateur night.

In the same time frame as the Dublin riots, in Netherlands, a Dutch neo-Nazi, Muslim-hater and a big lover of Israel won the elections. This was the culmination of a long-term project of international Jewry. Hand in hand with all the leaders of America and Europe, Israel had carefully played up all the historical ties between the Nazis of Europe and the US. The Internet had been buzzing with neo-Nazi activity. Threats against Jews reached all-time highs. Laws forbidding boycotts were passed. Days Of Remembrance were proclaimed. Standing ovations for Israeli leaders became normalized and then expected. The dramatic tension became unbearable as the leadership demonstrated loyalty to Israel and the people grumbled about Jewish privilege. In the midst of all this anxiety and hostility, the Jewish diaspora coordinated a wave of Muslim immigration with the Israeli war machine, creating a wave of perfectly justified anger at the Gaza genocide.

The anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim reaction was timed to bloom with the Israeli invasion of Gaza, not only in Europe and the US, but also in Russia. You probably have heard about the Jewish pogrom in Dagestan, the only pogrom in human history that occurred without a single Jew. Naturally not a single Jew was harmed, but there was a lot of the usual media noise. Jews and their friends placed hundreds of pictures allegedly depicting the brutal anti-Semites of Dagestan hunting Jews on a commercial flight. Clearly the Dagestanis were little more than pawns in a media trap, drawn to the plane by foreign reports and then ambushed by camera-wielding reporters.

It’s good to keep in mind that Jews are afraid neither of nationalists nor of Nazis. The closer the Nazi is to the top, the more he openly shows his love for Israel. Nationalists Donald Trump and Georgia Meloni adore Israel. White racists either defend Israel or they share racial theory with Jewry. Christian Zionists have integrated worship of the state into their religion. If Jews appear to battle the racists and nationalists, it’s only to keep them fresh in the news. First we must pull back the spring, so that when we release it the firing pin will send the bullet on its way. If the bullet does the damage, the Jew is blameless. Russian Jews did not hesitate to support Navalny the nationalist when his Russian Marches shook Moscow.

Jews as a rule are extreme nationalists, the rabbis struggling to keep the people divided from the Goyim and pristine in their ghettos. Hitlerites tolerated Jewish Nazis, and allowed them to have their own flag and anthem. Hungarian Zionists like Rudolf Kasztner collaborated with the Nazis to transport only the “best” Jews to Palestine.

For a long time Jews practice dialectics as the war strategy. In 19 c. they led the labour movement and the capitalist enrichment. G K Chesterton depicted a Jewish revolutionist being in cahoots with a Jewish capitalist. Now a Jewish supporter of Muslim immigration is in cahoots with Zionist who expels Muslims from their ancestral lands and with a Nazi who rabble-rousing crowds against the Muslims.

So here at last is the purpose behind the supposed tactical errors of our busy little friends. Wheels within wheels. As an oil well fire is blown out with TNT, they primed their neo-Nazi brigades and then delivered them a host of unwanted Muslims. As the authorities struggle to extinguish the fire, the people will begin to notice that the case of Gaza is just like the case of Dublin and Amsterdam. At that moment, the moral high ground will be snuffed out and the people will be left in that fog of war with which we are so familiar. The indignation of people will die out, Palestine will be mechanically cleansed of its native folk, and the Gaza beachfront properties may be openly claimed by racially pure, nationalist Jews. Even most progressive Jews like Benny Morris regretted that not all Palestinians were expelled in 1948.

Written with assistance of Mr Paul Bennett

White Slavery

Rob Smyth relates some little-known history of an evil trade

‘The cruelties of the Algerine pirates, shewing the present dreadful state of the English slaves, and other Europeans, at Algiers and Tunis; with the horrid barbarities inflicted on Christian mariners shipwrecked on the north western coast of Africa and carried into perpetual slavery.’

European Slaves, African Slave-Masters

A recent British television programme about a sunken galleon in British waters made some brief reference to the Barbary slave trade, something that is very rarely mentioned in these politically correct times. Accordingly, it must be a subject worth exploring further, particularly as many people seem to perceive – understandably in view of continual one-sided propaganda on such issues – that it is only black people who have suffered from slavery at the hands of another race. This perception is one which the global money power is keen to encourage, no doubt, as it inculcates a guilt complex among Whites; which, in turn, tends to stifle objections to the mass importation of cheap labour into the West and the transfer of investment and jobs to the Third World.

A national industry

Historically, the Mediterranean was always plagued by piracy, but from the later Middle Ages the scale of these activities intensified substantially, particularly through the state-supported corsairs operating from the Barbary Coast of North Africa. For several hundred years, they spread terror throughout the waters and coastlines of the Mediterranean and Atlantic. As John Gunther says of the Moors of this period in Inside Africa:–

‘Their national industry was piracy. They lived on loot, human and otherwise, and brought forcibly into the Maghreb great numbers of captured European (Christian) slaves.’ (p. 39)

There were, however, differences between the corsairs’ slave business and the unjustifiably more notorious trans-Atlantic slave trade. The black slaves in the latter trade were sold to white traders by their own people in exchange for rum, brandy, clothes, glass beads and other European goodies; and they were only traded for economic purposes. On the other hand, the white slaves of the North African corsairs were captured in raids on European shipping and coastlines, with no question of purchase or exchange; and they were carried away not just as slave labour, but also for purposes of ransom and harem service.

Detail from a 1684 engraving showing the Algiers slave market. In the right foreground there appear to be two European women, stripped and publicly exhibited for potential buyers.

The Moors in Spain

The Moors were the western-most adherents of Islam, which had spread rapidly in the Middle East and North Africa during the 7th and 8th centuries. They had invaded and occupied Spain in 711. Indeed, they advanced well into France before being defeated at Pointers by Charles Martel in 732. Then they retreated over the Pyrenees, and it was not until 1492, the year Columbus ‘discovered’ America, that they were finally expelled from Spain.

They were heavily engaged in human trafficking, and Andalusia, in Southern Spain, became an important centre for the slave trade. As Stephen Clissold wrote in ‘The Ransom Business,’ (History Today magazine, December 1976):–

‘Cordoba and other cities had their slave-markets where the human merchandise was examined and valued on sophisticated lines. Women were generally more highly prized than men and were carefully assessed by female inspectors, who recorded their physical attractions or defects in the purchase contract. Handbooks listing these good and bad qualities were especially composed to facilitate the delicate task.’ (p. 780)

In passing, it is interesting to reflect that the Moors occupied Spain for nearly 800 years. During much of that time they must have thought: “We are here to stay.”

But they weren’t.

Rise of the Barbary States

The expulsion of the Moors from Spain gave great impetus to the Barbary corsairs. Not only did the expulsion imbue the Moors with a hatred of Christianity, but also their numbers were too great for the economy of their new home, the Maghreb region of North Africa, to absorb. They joined motherland Moors, Algerians, Turks of the Ottoman Empire (to which the Barbary states were often linked) and others in the corsair business of plundering and human trafficking. Clissold tells us that:–

‘The Barbary States were organised primarily for this purpose, and for three centuries they continued to derive the major part of their revenues from the prizes and captives taken, and from the tribute or “presents” with which individual Christian countries sought to purchase immunity.’ (p. 779)

Matters got progressively worse. By the middle of the seventeenth century, the corsairs were marauding in the Atlantic and lurking in the English Channel. Attacks were not confined to merchant vessels. Even fishermen were attacked. Raids were made on coastal settlements, including some on Cornwall, where houses would be looted and inhabitants kidnapped. It is said that at one time 10,000 of the inhabitants of Algiers were slaves, a fifth of them British. Algiers became the chief centre of corsair activity; and the ocean-going vessels it developed were able to operate further away from base than the traditional galleys, bringing even Iceland within reach of the raiders.

Ransom and redemption

Much of the corsairs’ wealth came from the ransoming of captives. Among these, for example, was Cervantes, the famed author of Don Quixote, who was enslaved for five years before his family and friends managed to raise the required ransom money. Ransoming became big business, not only for the corsairs but also for the numerous intermediaries and brokers who negotiated or arranged payment. These included two great Redemptionist religious organisations, the Trinitarians and the Mercedarians, which specifically raised money for the purpose. Governments also sometimes raised ransom for their citizens. Tens of thousands of slaves changed hands in this period.

Ransom money and redemption expenses, often deliberately inflated by unscrupulous intermediaries, were not the totality of the cost. As Clissold relates:–

‘In addition to the ransom money, “presents” had to be made to the ruler and his hierarchy of officials. The number and cost of these had to be worked out and included in the Redemptionists’ budget; or they might otherwise have to buy them on the spot and incur crippling debts. Failure to make presents that their recipients regarded as suited to their rank and expectations caused great offense and might jeopardise the prospects of the mission.’ (p. 783)

Thus, a lot of people besides the corsairs were on the make from the business. As always, corruption breeds corruption.

Collaboration and renegades

The long reign of the corsairs was in no small measure due to the help they received from European governments and individuals. At a time when European solidarity was necessary, we see ruling elites making agreements with the corsairs in order to buy off attacks on their own people and property, or to encourage the corsairs to attack their competitors.

Even more disgraceful was the large-scale defection of renegades to the corsair cause. In those days, as now, there was no shortage of race-traitors willing to make money from the persecution of their own people. Some renegades were captives who had ‘turned Turk’ but many, from all over Europe, made their own way to corsair dominions and voluntarily embraced Islam. They were attracted by the wealth and opportunities in Algiers and other corsair strongholds. Not all of them engaged in piracy; some took positions as personal guards and officials, many reaching the highest positions of authority. Others aided the corsairs in technical matters. Clissold remarks in another article, ‘Christian Renegades and Barbary Corsairs’ (History Today, August 1976):–

‘Renegades and Christian slaves... were the chief agents for the transmission of technology, particularly in the military and naval fields, to the less advanced Islamic lands. It was the renegades who piloted the corsair ships in European coastal waters and divulged the weak spots in the Christian defences.’ (p. 512)

So we see that, as now, the renegades actively assisted in the pillaging of their own lands.

Apostates

The corsairs did not necessarily encourage conversion to Islam. As Clissold writes:–

‘By no means all these renegades had been forced to apostasise against their will. Pressure was indeed often applied against them precisely in a contrary direction. Apostasy did not automatically set a slave free, though he could generally expect to be better treated. He would no longer be fettered and sent to row in a galley. The corsairs, however, needed galley-slaves and were accordingly loath to let their Christians turn Moslem.’ (p. 509)

Other Christians were forced or bribed into changing their religion. Clissold mentions Father Gracian, a Carmelite friar, himself a captive, who related that a fellow priest was offered a substantial dowry if he would turn Moslem and marry the pretty fifteen-year-old daughter of a Moor. Clissold goes on:–

‘Christian girls were in special danger of being forced into apostasy unless they seemed likely to command rich ransoms. Gracian describes coming across a batch of Corsican and Calabrian girls who had just been taken captive. On making enquiries soon afterwards, he learned that all had already apostasised. To resist absorption into the harem was a forlorn hope. We hear of an English girl taken by Sallee Rovers in 1685 who was sent to the Moroccan Emperor Mouley Ismael for the honour of being deflowered. She at first resisted persuasions to turn Moslem and capitulated only after being handed over to the Emperor’s negresses who whipped her and tormented her with needles.’ (p. 510)

Mouley Ismael was truly a very unpleasant and sinister character, but his aims were, perhaps, not so far removed from those of some nasty social engineers of our own time, as we shall see later.

Eclipse

Eventually, several Western countries resorted to military measures against the corsairs. Portugal, Spain, France, Britain and, in 1804, even the United States, all became involved in the bombardment of North African ports in the hope of suppressing piracy. The latter remained remarkably resilient but the number of captives did gradually dwindle, especially after the British Navy’s devastating bombardment of Algiers in 1816. This episode alone Ied to the release of 3,000 slaves, some of whom had been held captive for 35 years. Yet, within two months, the rubble was cleared and the fortifications were rebuilt. It was not until 1830, when the French conquered Algeria, that the piracy was ended.

The multi-racialist Sultan

One can learn some useful lessons from history. For although technology and science might transform our physical environment, it seems unlikely that man himself has changed very much, if at all. The never-ending catalogue of horrific modern atrocities, frauds and other crimes bears testament to that. So it may be well to ponder with concern, as well as with casual interest, the lifestyle and motives of Sultan Mouley Ismael, as recorded in John Gunther’s Inside Africa:–

‘One extraordinary and fiendish choraeter was Sultan Moulay Ismael who ruled for fifty-five years between 1672 and 1727... He set out to build at Meknes, near Fez, a capital that would out-do Versailles. The royal stables alone were three miles long, and contained 12,000 horses; slaves who worked on these and other grandiose projects were, if they did not give satisfaction, cemented into the walls... Moulay is supposed to have had 549 wives, as well as concubines by the thousand, since he seldom used a woman twice. Of his children, 867 survived him. Hundreds of his daughters were strangled at birth. He imported vast numbers of Saharan Negroes to Meknes, systematically mated them to Moorish women, and set about to establish by this means a kind of Praetorian Guard of specially bred half-castes... He had several hundred thousand slaves, of whom 25,000 were captured Christians.’ (pp. 43-44)

Could it possibly be that our own beloved rulers are deliberately promoting miscegenation to create a Praetorian Guard for themselves or the New World Order?

Spearhead magazine, no. 409, March 2003

THE ANTICHRIST WANTS TO DO AWAY WITH ALL RACES FOR HIS GLOBAL TOTALITARIAN SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT!

Weapons of Mass Migration

Libya warns it could flood Europe with migrants if EU does not recognise new self-declared government
Breakaway government in Tripoli issues veiled threat in response to West’s refusal to accept their legitimacy

By Colin Freeman, Chief Foreign Correspondent in Tripoli 7:25PM GMT 02 Nov 2015

Libya has issued a veiled threat to send “hundreds of thousands” of extra migrants to Europe if Brussels does not give official recognition to its self-declared government.

Officials say they could hire boats to send large numbers of African migrants across the Mediterranean, massively adding to the numbers already reaching Europe’s borders.

The warning was made by a spokesman for the National Salvation Government of Libya’s General National Congress in an interview with The Telegraph in the Libyan capital, Tripoli.

That reminds me of an interesting-sounding scholarly book:

Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs)
by Kelly M. Greenhill

Dr. Greenhill wrote in the New York Times over 4 years ago:

Using Refugees as Weapons
By KELLY GREENHILL APRIL 20, 2011

In the early days of what grew into the Libyan uprising, Muammar el-Qaddafi summoned European Union ministers to Tripoli and issued an ultimatum: Stop supporting the protesters, or I’ll suspend cooperation on migration and Europe will be facing a human flood of from North Africa.

Given Libya’s history as an attractive transit point for North Africans seeking entry to Europe, it was a credible threat.

For one thing, it has worked to varying degrees at least four times in the last decade alone. Indeed, it was only the European Union’s promise to lift the last remaining sanctions against Libya in the fall of 2004 that persuaded Qaddafi to staunch what was then viewed as an alarmingly large flow of North Africans onto the tiny Italian island of Lampedusa and, from there, onto the Continent. To that point in 2004, about 9,000 people had landed on Lampedusa, 1,600 of whom arrived in the month prior to conclusion of the agreement between Brussels and Tripoli.

Although these numbers were not trivial, they were nothing compared to the predicted 750,000 to one million North Africans anticipated by Western European leaders this time around. Little wonder then that Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi of Italy tried to maintain good relations with Libya for as long as he found it diplomatically possible.

Moreover, what happened in 2004 was not an isolated event. In 2006, and again in 2008, Qaddafi extracted from the E.U. additional financial aid and equipment (such as boats) that could be used for migration enforcement. In late 2010, the E.U. and Libya concluded a further £500 million accord, which succeeded in stopping, or at least demonstrably slowing, the flow of people across the Mediterranean — until the outbreak of unrest in Tunisia.

Tragic though it is for the victims of this kind of unconventional coercion, Qaddafi’s threatened use of demographic bombs is neither new nor unique. As I demonstrated in a study published last year, there were at least 56 attempts to employ the direct or indirect threat of mass migrations as a non-military instrument of influence between 1951 and 2006.

In about 73 percent of cases where it was attempted, would-be coercers got at least some of what they sought; in about 57 percent of cases, they achieved most, if not all, of their objectives. The majority of these coercive attempts were initiated by authoritarian dictators such as Cuba’s Fidel Castro, East Germany’s Erich Honecker, the former Yugoslavia’s Slobodan Milosevic and Uganda’s Idi Amin.

THE POPE'S INVOLVEMENT IN WHITE GENOCIDE

"The illegal alien assault on America’s southwest border is not, as some would have you believe, a natural phenomenon. Neither is it the result of “climate change” as some government officials and even Pope Francis have claimed. Rather, it is the result of a deliberate government policy.

All practice – and this includes the practice of flooding America with illegal aliens – is the practice of some prior theory. When it comes to the American illegal alien crisis, we need to seek the source of the ideas that have led to the flooding of our nation with millions of illegal aliens over just the past two and a half years. Once we have located the source of those ideas, we likewise will have found the source of the crisis.

And what is the source of the theory that is causing the illegal alien assault on America? The very first quotation above gives it away, although it may not be obvious on the surface. The source of the ideas driving America’s illegal alien disaster is the Roman Catholic Church-State."

The Trinity Foundation - Antichrist's Illegal Alien Assault on America

"Israel was a nation founded on the Word of God. Yet by the time Isaiah began to write in the 8^th century bc, it had gone badly astray. So much so that the Southern Kingdom of Judah faced what we today would call an existential crisis. That is, the continuation of Judah as a nation was in doubt. The combination of internal corruption and external military pressure threatened to bring the nation to an end.

There are any number of modern English translations of the Bible...But I must confess that I have a great love for the King James or Authorized Version of the Bible and am very happy to use it when opportunity presents itself. Dealing as we are with the Roman Church-State’s destructive doctrine of immigration, I’m pleased to say that the King James Bible provides the best translation of Isaiah 1:7, the verse just quoted. I use it here.

“Your land, strangers devour it in your presence,” reads the Authorized Version’s (AV) translation of Isaiah 1:7. When I hear the AV’s translation of this verse, it does something to me. It makes my ears perk up a bit. It rivets my attention. Now, the translators could have rendered this verse, “Strangers devour your land in your presence,” and it would have been perfectly good English. That’s the way we normally talk. English is what’s called a subject, verb, object language. That is, in English the subject of the sentence usually comes first, then the verb or the action word, and finally the object on which the action is performed. Billy threw the ball. Here, Billy is the subject performing the action, “threw” is the verb telling us what action Billy performed, and “the ball” is the object that received the action. But what if I were to say, “The ball, Billy threw it”? That sentence has the same meaning as “Billy threw the ball,” but the emphasis is different. Your attention is drawn to “the ball” in a way that normal English word order would not draw it.

The AV’s translation of Isaiah 1:7 grabs our attention for this same reason. It puts the object, “your land,” in the emphatic first position in the clause. But the AV is not the best translation of this verse simply because it puts the emphasis on “your land.” The AV is the best translation, because it does the best job brining into English the original force of prophet’s words in Hebrew. For that’s exactly how Isaiah wrote it, he put “your land” in the emphatic first position in its clause. And putting “your land” in first position in the clause had the same effect in the original Hebrew as it does in the AV’s translation. It got people’s attention. The land, the land promised to the Hebrew nation by God, the land flowing with milk and honey, the land where the Israelites had lived for centuries. It was this land that was being devoured by strangers.

But what does it mean for the land to be devoured by strangers? Edward Young’s comments on this verse are helpful here. Young understands “your land” as “the fruit of the land,” what we would call the land’s economic output.

And why were strangers devouring Judah’s land? As Isaiah makes clear, it was because of Judah’s sin that this was happening. In an earlier verse, Isaiah had described Judah as a “sinful nation” that had “gone away backward.” That is not only had the men of Judah veered off course, but they also were going 180 degrees in the opposite direction from which they should have been going. Isaiah details their many sins throughout the rest of chapter one.

And not only were strangers – the Hebrew word translated “strangers” could also be rendered “foreigners” – devouring Judah’s land, but to add insult to injury, they were devouring the land “in your presence.” In English, we have this saying “in your face.” When I do something “in your face,” not only am I harming you, but I’m insulting you as well. I’m saying, in effect, “you’re so weak and cowardly, I’m going to double-dog dare you to stop me, but I know you won’t.” Now if I have respect for someone who I know may fight back, and if I seek to do him harm, I’ll do it behind his back. I won’t do it in his face. But the strangers devouring the fruits of Judah’s land, they had no respect for Judah. Judah was weak spiritually and morally and was thus unable to defend itself against the pillaging and insults of these foreigners. The foreigners knew it, and so did the Judeans.

There is, in my opinion, a parallel between Judah’s situation in Isaiah’s day and the condition of the United States in the early 21^st century. Like Judah, America was founded on Biblical principles. It was the Puritans who brought Reformed Christianity to the New World, and this set the pattern for what would later become the United States. “In the beginning all America was Protestant – 98 percent of the people,” wrote John Robbins in his Trinity Review “Rebuilding American Freedom in the Twenty-First Century.” In Ecclesiastical Megalomania, Robbins quoted German historian Leopold von Ranke, who called John Calvin the “virtual founder of America.” In a speech given on August 1, 1776, Samuel Adams remarked, “Our forefathers threw off the yoke of Popery in religion; for you is reserved the honor of leveling the popery of politics…This day, I trust, the reign of political Protestantism will commence.”

But like Judah who had “gone away backward,” America in time began to forget the Lord. The churches that had faithfully proclaimed the Gospel in colonial times, began to go apostate in the 19^th century and, at least the so-called mainline Protestant denominations, were almost entirely apostate by the end of the first half of the 20^th century. Think of the complete capture of the mainline Presbyterian church in the 1920s and 1930s by the liberals, despite the best efforts of J. Gresham Machen and others. As a result of this capture, a church that once gloried in the Gospel of Jesus Christ now glories in same-sex marriages.

In Deuteronomy 28, the Lord lays out in stark terms both the blessings the Israelites will receive if they obey the voice of the Lord, and the curses they can expect for disobedience:

The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low. He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail. (Verses 43 and 44)

If the Israelites were punished by the Lord for their apostasy – and I take it that the disastrous picture of Judah Isaiah paints in chapter one of his book is a fulfillment of the curses outlined in Deuteronomy 28 – what about Protestant America? Can we expect anything different? Perhaps the unbelief of American Protestant churches explains the rise of political Romanism in America.

In 1928, Al Smith, a longtime member of Tammany Hall, New York City’s famously corrupt Democratic political machine, became the first Roman Catholic to run for President. Despite the apostasy of America’s Protestants that was well under way by 1928 – the notorious Auburn Affirmation dated from 1924 – Smith’s candidacy still managed to cause quite a stir. Smith’s Romanism was famously challenged by Charles C. Marshall in The Atlantic. Marshall expressed the concerns of many that the dogmas of Rome were irreconcilable with the Constitution the president “must support and defend.” Marshall was right to be concerned, for the economic and political thought of the Roman Church-State as well as the claims of the papacy cannot be squared with the Constitution. John Robbins demonstrated this in Ecclesiastical Megalomania.

Al Smith lost the 1928 election to Herbert Hoover. But 32 years later in 1960, John F. Kennedy would go on to become America’s first Roman Catholic President. But even in 1960, America’s Protestants still showed enough discernment to be concerned at the prospect of a Roman Catholic in the White House. Kennedy famously gave a speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association, the purpose of which was to convince Americans concerned that Kennedy’s Romanism would lead him to follow the pope and not the Constitution. According to an article in Politico, the ministers gave Kennedy a standing ovation at the end of his speech,[6] which underscores the weakening of Protestant discernment from 1928. By the time Roman Catholic John Kerry ran as a Democrat in 2004, there was almost no opposition at all from any quarter in America to a Roman Catholic President.

Then in 2020, Roman Catholic Joe Biden unseated nominal Presbyterian Donald Trump to become America’s second Roman Catholic President. I followed this election closely and do not recall a single objection to Biden on the grounds that he was a Romanist. In a mere 92 years, America went from great alarm at the idea of a Roman Catholic in the White House to complete indifference.

But the indifference of America’s Protestants to the specter of a Roman Catholic President is in truth a commentary on their lack of discernment and not on the lack of danger a Roman Catholic White House presents to our Constitutional Republic. The economic and political thought of Rome, sometimes called Catholic Social teaching, is opposed to what Robbins called constitutional capitalism, the economic and political teachings found in the Scriptures, that is, the 66 books of the Bible. Globalism, socialism, gun control, climate change, attacks on free speech, social justice, critical race theory, and the homosexual/transgender movement are just some of the issues Rome uses to attack the liberties of the American people.

But there is another issue in which Rome is deeply involved, one that poses an existential threat to America, yet Rome’s involvement in it is almost completely unknown to the public. That issue is the main subject of this article: immigration.

It may come as something of a surprise to many people to hear that Rome is at the very heart of America’s ongoing immigration crises. While the current administration’s policies are the proximate cause of this immigration disaster, what is not appreciated is that the current administration’s immigration practice is really the practice of Rome’s destructive immigration doctrine, which is itself based on the false theology and philosophy of the Roman Church-State.

But despite Rome’s theoretical and practical involvement in America’s immigration mess, almost no scrutiny is brought to bear on Rome’s role. In American Democracy & The Vatican: Population Growth & National Security, Stephen D. Mumford went into some detail on how Rome successfully suppressed criticism of itself:

Every city editor in the United States knows of the unofficial [Roman] Catholic censorship of American news, but almost all publishers avoid discussion of the phenomenon out of fear of reprisals. The [Roman] Church frequently succeeds in intimidating the most powerful newspapers by using organized protest and boycott, even though in many cases the facts suppressed have great social significance.

But despite the Church-State’s best efforts, some truth does manage to leak out to the public. One example of this is from the former administration official Stephen K. Bannon’s comments to The Washington Post in September 2017, shortly after he resigned from the Trump White House:

Stephen K. Bannon, President Trump’s former chief strategist, lashed out at leaders of the [Roman] Catholic Church in the United States who condemned the President’s recent decision to phase out an Obama-era program that has allowed nearly 800,000 undocumented immigrants who were brought to the country as children to gain temporary legal status.

Bannon, who is [a Roman] Catholic, accused the church of wanting a steady flow of illegal immigrants coming into the country to fill its church pews and make money.

“Unable to really come to grips with the problems in the Church, they need illegal aliens, they need illegal aliens to fill the churches,” Bannon said in an interview with Charlie Rose that will air on “60 Minutes” on CBS on Sunday. “It's obvious on the face of it.”

Bannon added: “They have an economic interest. They have an economic interest in unlimited immigration, unlimited illegal immigration.”

A Newsmax article reported Bannon making a similar statement,

“The pope, more than anybody else, has driven the migrant crisis in Europe,” declared Bannon, who is Catholic. “The Catholic church. I have gone after [New York Archbishop] Cardinal [Timothy] Dolan. The Catholic church is one of the worst instigators of this open borders policy.”

Steve Bannon is not the only well-known Roman Catholic to criticize the Church-State for its destructive immigration practices. Noted conservative author Michelle Malkin was sharply critical of Rome in Open Borders Inc. Who’s Funding America’s Destruction? In a chapter titled “Unholy Alliance: The Pope, Catholic Bishops, and Amnesty Profiteers,” Malkin exposes the immigration hypocrisy of Pope Francis and the American Catholic Church’s grifting off the taxpayer. For example, Malkin notes Pope Francis’ remarks following his appearance in Juarez, Mexico – Juarez lies directly across the Rio Grande from El Paso, TX, about which I will have more to say below. She reports how Pope Francis famously threw shade at then-candidate Donald Trump for wanting to build a wall along the US/Mexico border and quotes the Pope saying, “A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be located, and not building bridges, is not a Christian. This is not in the gospel, the Pope told journalists who asked his opinion on Trump’s proposals to halt illegal immigration.” But this same Pope Francis who so unctuously lectures the nations of the West on their duty to take in every migrant that comes their way, himself does not practice what he preaches. Reports Malkin,

Pope Francis further counsels every other sovereign nation to implement a program of open-ended hospitality for “welcoming the stranger” in the spirit of Saint Benedict. To date, however, the pontiff has not instituted such a policy in his own nation-state and thrown open the gates of Vatican City to any and all strangers seeking refuge…Pope Francis himself – the loudest preacher of “welcoming the stranger” – has yet to resettle a single refugee inside the walls of the Vatican. A few families brought by the pope to Rome from a Greek detention center for a widely disseminated photo op in 2016 were dumped in the community of Sant’ Egidio outside the Vatican walls and are given living expenses “every now and then.”

In my own research, I have found over two dozen Roman Catholic organizations openly working to assist the breaking of American immigration law. One of the most egregious examples in this regard is Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley (CCRGV). Headed by a nun named Norma Pimentel, this organization has recently attracted scrutiny from two outside groups, Judicial Watch and Catholic Vote Civic Action, that have filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit requesting all communications between the US Customs and Border Protection and, among others, CCRGV and Sister Norma Pimentel in her capacity as the Executive Director of CCRGV. In classic cry bully fashion, the Jesuit publication America published “Two nuns have a message for Catholics angry about their ministry to immigrants: ‘We don’t have any intention of stopping.’” The article goes on to complain about how the “sisters” have been receiving harassing phone calls as a result of the FOIA lawsuit but will persevere in doing what they’ve been doing all along. Now as a Christian, I don’t advocate making harassing phone calls to people – that is, if there really were any harassing phone calls; after all, we’re dealing with the Jesuits here – but these nuns and CCRGV are not the victims. They are the perpetrators, guilty of working to subvert American immigration law for the benefit of the Roman Church-State and to the harm of the American people."

The Trinity Foundation - Antichrist's Destructive Doctrine of Immigration

Democracy is a Joke

Marine Le Pen's conviction and the specter of war with Iran reveal it to be false

Many of us woke up this morning to the news that Marine Le Pen was sentenced by a French court to two years under house arrest, and was barred from running for elected office for five years—effectively barring her from the 2027 presidential election.

Meanwhile, over the weekend President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Iran, telling NBC’s Kristen Welker “If they don't make a deal there will be bombing. It will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

Throughout the West, no matter what the people vote for, we get more of the same.

For decades, Le Pen has been engaged in a “long march through the institutions.” With infinite patience, she slowly and meticulously built her once-fringe party into one of the leading political forces in France. From 10.4% of the vote when she first ran for president in 2007, she increased her share of the vote to 17.9% in 2012, then to 21.3% in 2017. That year, she made it into the second round of elections, winning 33.9% of the vote. Finally, in the 2022 presidential election, she won 23.2% of the vote in the first round, and 41.5% in the second round.

After decades of neoliberal corruption and the ravages of mass immigration in France, the year 2027 was setting up to be the year Marine Le Pen finally achieved her big electoral breakthrough. Over the years, she’s made many sacrifices, and some ugly political compromises, to ascend to this point. She’s come under severe and often justified criticism from nationalists around the world for “selling out” on important issues. Nevertheless, in the postwar era, no nationalist leader in a major European country or in America has even come close to achieving what Marine Le Pen, under National Rally, was set to achieve in the 2027 presidential election.

We may pass over the details of Le Pen’s conviction for “embezzlement” with the simple fact that the current president of France, Emmanuel Macron, has an estimated net worth of between $40-50 million, mostly obtained through his career as an investment banker, where he literally worked for the Rothschilds. Political corruption is so ubiquitous in all major parties in the West, that it’s increasingly rare to see anyone get anywhere near the summit of electoral politics without being a millionaire or billionaire, or without billionaire patrons. Obscene, out-of-control plutocracy has become the norm during this Second Gilded Age of the 21st century.

Regardless of the guilt or innocence of Mme. Le Pen, the real reason she was convicted is obvious to every organism on this planet with a brainstem: to prevent her from running for president in 2027. Even with all her compromises—Marine’s own past statements and positions, the Le Pen family name and the legacy of her father are still enough that political elites in Europe will not allow her to take the presidency.

The task of representing National Rally in the 2027 French presidential elections will now presumably fall to Le Pen’s bland and colorless lieutenant Jordan Bardella, who may or may not be acceptable to elites due to his aggressive Zionism and signaling against “antisemitism.” In any case, he lacks the charisma and force of personality to be any kind of transformational force in French politics. At best, National Rally under his leadership will complete the process of “selling out” and become another establishment party working within the system.

In many ways, the trajectory of Le Pen’s career now resembles—to a less extreme degree—the course followed by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. After decades of slowly building support under the most extreme repression, this popular movement finally had its big parliamentary breakthrough in 2011, during the so-called Arab Spring. The following year, in what is considered the only free and fair presidential election in Egyptian history, the Egyptian people elected as president the engineer Mohammad Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party. Yet within two years, Morsi was overthrown in a military coup backed by Israel and the United States. He was sentenced to death in 2016, and died in custody in 2019.

Just like in the West, they love democracy in the Middle East—until the people vote for the wrong man.

This isn’t the first time a “democratic” European country has resorted to overturning election results or imprisoning nationalist leaders to keep them out of power, either. Just weeks ago, a Romanian high court unanimously ruled “far right” Romanian candidate Calin Georgescu, who won the first round of last year’s presidential vote, is ineligible to run again in May after the results of the last election were annulled.

The worst example in modern history is that of the Greek ultranationalist party Golden Dawn, which by 2013 became the third most popular party in “the birthplace of democracy,” and was subsequently branded a criminal organization by the establishment parties. All of its elected MPs were thrown in prison. After serving almost a decade behind bars, Golden Dawn’s leader Nikolaos Michaloliakos was released last year due to his advancing age—but his release was quickly overturned by a panel of judges and he was cast back into prison.

Here in the United States, democracy is being annulled in a different way. From the beginning of his political career, Donald Trump powered his path to the presidency by positioning himself against the neocons in the Republican Party who led America into the disastrous Iraq war. Above all, Trump’s politics were seen as a repudiation of the aggressive warmongering of the former Senator John McCain who, in a sick and twisted parody of the 1961 Beach Boys hit song, “Barbara Ann,” lost the 2008 presidential election to Barack Obama after joking that he wanted to “bomb bomb bomb Iran.”

Yet over the weekend, bombing Iran is what Trump explicitly promised to do. Seemingly acting on orders from Israeli president Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump’s biggest donor Miriam Adelson, his son-in-law Jared Kushner and other Zionist Jews in his circle of advisors and donors, Trump seems intent on spending his entire political capital on pushing a program of mass ethnic cleansing against the people of Gaza and provoking Iran into a direct military conflict with the United States. Just this week, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ordered B-2 stealth bombers to the U.S. bases in the Indian Ocean, echoing the opening moves of both Operation Desert Storm in 1991 and Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003.

All the pieces are being put into place for a major U.S. military campaign against Iran, waged on behalf of Israel. Meanwhile, back at home, arch-Zionist Attorney General Pam Bondi has implemented a multi-agency Task Force to Combat Antisemitism which is redefining terrorism to include “pre-crime” thoughts and opinions far more sweeping than anything attempted under the Bushes, Biden or Obama. By invoking Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to shut down anti-Zionist protests on college campuses, the new Trump administration—instead of canceling the “Woke” assault on free speech—is doubling down on it. Today, Trump enthusiastically endorsed the openly genocidal Jewish extremist Randy Fine for Florida’s 6th Congressional District, who wants to add hate crime enhancements to acts of “antisemitic littering” that would imprison Americans for five years or more simply for distributing leaflets critical of Israel.

No matter what White people vote for, we get more of the same. Leaders and parties who can’t be bought or corrupted, are simply criminalized by the Judeo-capitalist system. Elections are overturned, phony charges are trumped up, kangaroo courts pronounce sham sentences while wholesale corruption and even treason are the norm for the establishment politicians and parties. Meanwhile, fake populists and scam artists brazenly bait-and-switch their incredulous voters by running on one thing and then doing the opposite once in power.

Democracy is a joke. If Whites in America, Europe and Australia are going to secure our rights, then we’re going to have to find other ways of organizing power and exercising leverage besides competing in wholly rigged and discredited electoral systems. Liberal democracy in the West is totally illegitimate; at best it’s a transparent cover on a system of brutally unresponsive and uncaring Jewish plutocracy.

Democracy is a Joke - by Warren Balogh - Warren’s Substack

Jews and Muslims Working Together to Replace Whites

Occidental Dissent Classic

I was walking in my former Chicago neighborhood I grew up in, two blocks from the Chicago Kenwood Hyde Park mansion of President Barack Obama. The Obamas are rarely if ever there these days. Though, the Obama Foundation and White hating Chicago Black elites (George Lucas Black bitc* Melody Hopkins wife of Star Wars Producer George Lucas, Desiree Rogers, Michelle Obama) are making a power move to take over Chicago’s South Side Lakefront Park Jackson Park and make it Obama Library Park. But, there is still 24/7 Secret Service protection for the street where the Obamas once lived. There is a large Jewish synagogue a few yards from the Obama mansion. It doesn’t really look like a Jewish synagogue. It looks more like an Islamic mosque. So what is an Arabic/Ottoman mosque looking Jewish synagogue doing just one block from the home of the American President, who is the bastard son of a Black Muslim Kenyan?

Another related question is:

How did an obscure, half White Illinois state representative Barack Obama become a huge player in Chicago Black power politics, then become a US Senator and four years later President of the United States of America?

And how did Hillary Clinton’s (lesbian lover?) Saudi Sunni chief of staff Huma Abedin get married to New York Jew texting pervert Anthony Weiner?

The answer to these questions have to do with the seemingly Byzantine nature of Chicago, American and Western politics.

“All politics are local.” — US Speaker of the House Tip O’Neil

“All politics are racial/ethno-religious.” — Jack Ryan, Occidental Dissent

Barack Obama rose almost overnight from a nobody to a US Senator to President of the United States in large part from a coalition of Black power groups and Liberal-Left, heavily Jewish groups and advisers like David Axelrod. More extremist cultural Marxists like SDS Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn were also involved. But like Obama’s crazed Black Liberation Theology, hate White people preacher Jeremiah Wright, these Leftist Marxists kept a lower profile. The American New Left of the late 1960s and all through the 1970s was heavily Jewish as of course were the Bolshevik-Communist movements in Russia and other Eastern and European countries a century ago. It wasn’t some huge super secret conspiracy, it’s just the way things were.

Well, speaking of the way things were and are – how about the terrible violence between Israeli Jews and Palestinian Muslims now occurring in Jerusalem? It must be that Jews and Muslims are great enemies, have always been enemies…

That’s a decided “NO” on that one.

Israel, the American Jewish elite and Saudi Arabia are now allied on everything that matters – including the mass Muslim migration invasion of Europe, the West.

Israel and Saudi Arabia have accepted essentially Zero Syrian war refugees – Israel is expelling all 3rd world undocumented, illegal aliens. Israel has built very effective border walls. This in the same time when Jews are rioting in the US Congress demanding all 3rd world illegal aliens/dreamers be given full US Citizenship.

This looks like a contradiction, but it’s not.

Jews are making Israel an exclusively Jewish ethno state.

Jews are working 24/7 to make all remaining White European countries, multi cultural, multi racial. The Jews main fear is to get caught, discovered in a homogenous White country/state/society where leaders like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán will expose and expel the likes of George Soros.

Until the foundation of the modern Jewish state of Israel in 1948, Jews and Muslims tended to have much better relations than Jews and European Christians, especially Jews and European Catholics. Jews then and now tried to fit in with their Islamic rulers, that’s why lots of Jewish synagogues like this one in Chicago look just like Islamic mosques. Jews and Muslims tend to have long memories – both groups know and remember that Spain was invaded and occupied by Muslim Arab Moors for….

700 years!

On, balance the Moorish Spanish years are considered a golden age for the Jewish people. When Spanish Catholics reconquered Spain from the Muslim Moors there was…

The expulsion of the Jews from Spain in 1492 and the Spanish Inquisition!

What was with all of that?!

Here is a OD/Instauration classic history lesson on 15th Century Spain – these same multicultural conflicts, temporary alliances and betrayals are now back with us this year 2015.

Spain Might Have Had Some Good Reasons to Expel the Jews

Instauration Magazine November 1992

(Presented for the educational, non commercial use, “fair comment” protected by the 1st Amendment)

“Every schoolboy is or should be familiar with the year 1492, the year of the (re)discovery of the New world by Christopher Columbus, a Genoese in the service of the Spanish monarchs, Ferdinand and Isabella. For Spain, 1492 was to be the most important year in its history, as well as one of the most important in world history. It was the year the Spanish nation was consolidated, the year it said adios to the Middle Ages, the year when the splendorous Spanish State took center stage in the political evolution of the West. In the beginning of the year, on January 2, after a long siege, the army of the Spanish monarchs marched into the city of Granada, thus re-conquering the last of the real estate seized by the Arabs and moors seven centuries earlier. Then, on March 31, the Catholic monarchs signed a royal edict that ordered all Jews in Spain to convert to Christianity or ship out. Five months later Columbus sailed out of the Spanish port of Palos hoping to discover a new route to the Indies. His tiny fleet passed boats loaded with Jews sorrowfully complying with Ferdinand and Isabella’s expulsion order.

In this 500th anniversary of Columbus’s epochal voyage, much of the celebration has been marred by media inspired attacks on Spain for her “cruelty” and “foolishness” in expelling Jews. No one seemed to care what was done to the Muslims, who were also given the choice of conversion or expulsion a few years later, just as no one these days seems to care much about what was done to non-Jews in WWII German and Soviet concentration camps, where the death toll of Gentiles was probably ten times greater than the number of Jewish fatalities. Actually, any Jew who converted to Christianity was perfectly free to stay in Spain. Those who left could take all their earthly possessions with them, except gold and silver coins and trinkets.

The current media story line is that the Spanish, in a fit of blind religious fanaticism, cut off their noses to spite their faces by kicking out the clever and enterprising Jewish community. Having heard these tearful tales over and over again, history buffs could be forgiven for thinking that only mass insanity could have led Spaniards to commit such an enormous gaffe. Jews, today’s spin doctors insist, were the cultural and economic backbone of Spain, the most educated and verbal segment of the population. Only greed, envy, ignorance and Christian bigotry could possibly explain this act of pure folly. Once again, a peaceful, unoffending people were driven out into the cold because of the heartlessness of their wicked neighbors. But that is not the end of the story! As is almost always the case, there was a price to be paid for persecuting the Jews. The price for Spain, according to the Jewish version of history, was its decline and fall, following the loss of so much Jewish brainpower and the economic and cultural benefits which Spain’s rivals, Portugal and Holland, received from swarms of Jewish refugees.

Per usual, when it comes to Jews, the story they tell is, shall we say, at variance with the facts. Fourteen hundred and ninety-two was the year Spanish civilization took off like a rocket. Within a century or two, Cervantes was writing Don Quixote; Velasquez was painting his incomparable portraits; Calderon was writing his brilliant plays. It almost seemed as if the presence of the Jews had kept Spanish culture under wraps and their forced removal unloosed tremendous bursts of artistic, literary and economic energy. (Might it be possible that the same unshackling of cultural forces would produce similar results if the Jews left the U. S.?) In A History of Medieval Spain, Professor Joseph F. O’Callaghan provides us with perhaps the most scholarly and precise treatment of Spanish history in the time between the Arab conquest and the Moors’ surrender of Granada. Spain had its origins in the Roman Empire. The Roman provinces in what is now Spain and Portugal furnished the Empire with some of its greatest Emperors. With the fall of Rome, Spain was transformed into a kingdom of Visigoths, one of the German tribes which had inherited remnants of the Empire. The Visigothic kings were Christianized and ruled over a population comprised partly of Nordics and largely of Mediterraneans, with a heavy sprinkling of Jews. Later, when the Arabs imposed Islam on Spain, the composition of the population was not greatly changed. The overwhelming majority of Arabs and Spaniards belonged to the Mediterranean race, though Nordic racial traits, such as fair complexions and blue eyes (Isabella had them), were discernible in the ruling circles of both peoples. Some Nordic genes had been implanted by the Vandals who swept through Spain before the Visigoths and fought their way as far as Tunis in North Africa. Here, it might also be noted, that the Muslim rulers and Caliphs of Spain were not exactly cultural throwbacks. The Alhambra Palace in Granada is the most beautiful and most graceful pleasure dome to be found on any continent. In 675 the Muslims launched their first raid on Spain, which was repulsed by the Visigothic fleet. By 711, the Arabs had conquered North Africa and were ready to invade Western Europe. in only 21 years they penetrated as far north as Tours in France before being defeated and thrown back by the Franks under Charles Martel.

The reasons for the woefully poor showing of the Visigoths vis-a-vis the Arab invaders had to do with treason in high places. As O’Callaghan remarks, “Certainly the Jews and others who had suffered under Visigothic rule welcomed the invaders as liberators and collaborated with them.” As O’Callaghan also points out, perhaps to avoid endangering his academic standing, the Jewish renegadism was justified by the “disorder” of the Visigothic Kingdom. The re-conquest of Spain started in the rugged mountains’ of Asturias in northern Spain. There a Visigothic knight, Pelayo, refused to bow down to the Muslims and won the first battle in a 700-year-war between Islam and Christianity. The Reconquista, as it is known, was a glorious era in the history of the West. A proud and fierce people would be tried and tested in a thousand battles. The Jews, as is their custom, quickly burrowed into the Arab fabric of Spain. Generally preferring Muslim to Christian overlords, the People of the Book were allowed to practice their religion without interference and became key elements in Muslim society. it need hardly be added that the Christians who had suffered from Jewish money men in Visigothic times, came to loathe them more than ever in Muslim Spain.

By the 11th century the situation in Spain had become fluid, with the Christians slowly nibbling back parts of their lost lands, while constantly under the threat of fierce Muslim counterattacks. It is not surprising that the eternal “middlemen” should rise to the surface in these troubled times. In both the Muslim and Christian parts of Spain, Jews engaged in all their age-old occupational specialties: usury, the slave trade, prostitution, tax “farming” (contracts to collect taxes for the kings and nobles), the law, medicine, administration and any other type of employment that required little or no physical labor. Worst of all from the point of view of the pious Christian population, they were able to infiltrate the church in large numbers. It was this last activity that led to their downfall. As Muslim power waned, Jews relied more and more on the expanding Christian kingdoms of Spain to provide them with their customary perks. Employed by Spanish monarchs in the most sensitive matters of state, especially in finance, Jews never had it so good since the good old days of Solomon. The Chosen, however, could not enter the church without converting. It was not too long before true Christians realized that the Christianity of most “New Christians” was only skin deep. That converted Jews mocked the Christian religion, celebrated Jewish feast days, and were slowly and subtly introducing Talmudic themes into Christian theology were open secrets. It was no wonder they came to be viewed as a hostile element, busy weakening the Christian nation in the very face of the Muslim enemy.

High-Octane Religiosity

In the Middle Ages religion was the fault line of the world. In the same way that the West fought communism in this century, so the Christian West fought the power of Islam in those crucial years. Religion was central to all aspects of life, there being no such thing as a secular state. It is a waste of words to argue that Christian Spain should have made room for Jews and Muslims. Such an accommodation was quite out of the question in the Age of Faith. When Spain expelled the Jews, England, France and other European nations had long since sent them on their way, for approximately the same reasons. The main difference was that the number of Jews and their influence and affluence in Spain were vastly greater than elsewhere in Europe. Ironically the European nations that would later condemn Spain for expelling Jews were the first to voice suspicion of Spain’s “purity” because it had been “defiled” by the presence of so many Jews and Muslims. Queen Isabella agreed up to a point. She knew very well that as long as Jews remained in her kingdom they would constitute a political, cultural, philosophical and theological fifth column, not to mention a military liability in the event of a Muslim attempt to retake what they had lost, a scary scenario that was always a possibility.

Isabella and her husband, Ferdinand, knew in their hearts that only by building one undivided and indivisible Spain could they carry out the tremendous task they had set for themselves. They understood what we seem to have forgotten: You cannot build a nation out of disparate population groups widely separated by culture and religion. Either Jews and Muslims would leave or renounce their faith, or Spain, as a united Christian country, would never endure. Although Jews are not a race, they act like a race and should be treated as one. Anthropologically speaking, they are various mixtures of the Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean races, with a few distinctive facial traits showing up in many of them. Isabella’s relying on religion to define a Jew may have been adequate in her day, but it would be wide off the mark in 1992. Today, in the U.S. about 70% of Jews are non-religious. To use Judaism as a basis for expelling Jews would allow the more intelligent and more devious Jews to remain in our midst.

The Jews in the Christian Spain aborning were not fools. They were quite aware that popular sentiment was rising against them. Fighting back in any way they could, they bribed powerful and corrupt nobles and worked their way into high positions in the government and church. All in vain. In 1391 massive anti-Jewish pogroms broke out across Spain. In that year, thousands of Jews were killed in Aragon and Castile, in the words of O’Callaghan,

Hostility towards the Jews had often been manifested in the past, chiefly because of their involvement in money-lending and tax-farming. Complaints about Jewish usury and Jewish tax collectors occur again and again in the records of the Cones [the Spanish parliament or assembly] . . . . Though the Crown usually promised to attend to these complaints, Jews continued to figure prominently in the management of royal finances. The riots of 1391 spelled the beginning of the end for Spanish Jewry, although it would still hold on for another hundred years. The simple truth was that Spain had outgrown Jews, just as it had outgrown Muslims. The Jews, as stated previously, had no part to play in Spain’s great years, which, some cynics say, is why Spain had its “great years.” The Encyclopedia Britannica (1963 edition, vol. 2 1, p. 122) adds: “The tide of national enthusiasm, religious fanaticism and indignation at Jewish financial operations reached its high-water mark about three months after the fall of Granada. . . .” Apparently there were early-bird Milikens and Boeskys in the ranks of Spanish Jewry. Professor Philip W. Powell, in his book, The Tree of Hate (published in 1985) attributes the expulsion of the Jews to a religious conflict between Judaism and Christianity. He is not afraid to meet the issue of anti-Semitism head on: ‘The very misleading term of ‘anti-Semitism’ is so carelessly, or malevolently, tossed about these days that it virtually has no meaning except as a convenient rock to hurl in anger–but, like a rock, it can hurt.” He goes on to say: “The Jews’ impassioned opinions hamper the writing of fair and unbiased accounts of Spain. Jewish emotion, when aroused by historical memory of [the] Spanish Inquisition and expulsion, exaggerates and distorts, and certainly gives little shrift to the Spanish side of the story …. Jewish writers are aided by a popular opinion, much of it created by themselves, which for centuries has influenced writing upon these themes.”

Powell points out that while it is true that all the 165,000 or so Jews who refused to give up Judaism were expelled in 1492, many more chose to stay and converted. Those who only converted superficially underwent various forms of capital punishment. Jews and other writers of anti-Spanish tendencies, have preferred to focus attention upon these Spanish crimes as a means of demonstrating Spanish cruelty and bigotry. The usual groundwork for this is a morality of later centuries applied to 15th and 16th century historical situations, without that sense of justice so essential to historical interpretations. Or, sometimes more simply, it may come from the well-known Jewish propensity for cultural replenishment out of martyrdom. Professor Powell gets to the nitty-gritty in these words: “But the majority of the Spanish people, witnessing [all the] evidence of Jewish-Converso influence . . . . and simply the numbers of Jews daily discernible in the population would, and did, view the situation with antagonism.”

Explaining that this antagonism sometimes led to mob attacks on Jews, Powell dryly adds, “If there was anything uniquely Spanish in all this, it was not intolerance or bigotry, but rather a notable forbearance in comparison to the ways the Jewish problem was handled elsewhere in Europe.”

Inquisition Hype

The chief purpose of the Spanish Inquisition, established in 1480, was to ensure that Jews did not create a “state within a state.” The Inquisition was a defense of the monarchy and a defense against treason. Many European states applauded its creation as a needed step to rein in Jewish power. Whatever the Inquisition was to become once the Jews had gone, it served its primary purpose in ridding Spain of a hostile force of infiltrators and subversives at a time when the church and nation were in grave danger. The ferocity of the Spanish Inquisition may well stem from the fact that it was in large part staffed by Jewish converts, who amply demonstrated that they had lost none of their innate venom by switching religions. Jewish converts who fell all over themselves to prove their loyalty to their new faith were the driving force behind the grim and fanatical persecution of other Jews. Tomas de Torquemada, the ferocious Inquisitor General, who sent so many of his brethren to the stake, is said to have been of Jewish descent. No less an authority than Salvador de Madariaga, one of modern Spain’s leading intellectuals, holds to the view that the peculiar intolerance of the Spanish Inquisition can be traced, in part, to the presence of Jewish converts in its highest ranks. Madariaga, by the way, made up for this “anti-Semitic” opinion by stating that Columbus was a converso, but not necessarily a marrano (pig in Spanish), a derogatory term for a convert who practiced Judaism secretly. Several Jewish scholars, including the non-scholars of Time magazine, have accused King Ferdinand of being “part Jewish,” though they never satisfactorily explain where the Jewish genes came from. To sum up, Spain’s expulsion of the Jews was logical, rational and, for the times, not overly cruel – far less cruel than what modern Jews have done and continue to do to the Palestinians. The Spanish have no need to apologize for their actions in freeing their nation from a harmful internal enemy. The Jews resented their expulsion, as they have resented other forced exoduses in their history. The truth is, contemporary Jews should not blame Spain for their ancestors’ misfortunes five centuries ago. They need only to look in the mirror.

Jews and Muslims Working Together to Replace Whites – Occidental Dissent

The Bible Is Against Open Borders | Close the Borders