"If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you."

(John 15:18)

THE JEWISH ASSAULT ON FREE SPEECH

Dr. Paul Cameron of the Family Research Institute and Reverand Ted Pike of Truth Tellers alongside my old friend the late Wayne Morin Jr. (Wayne is in Heaven with Jesus now) I miss him every day and the Army of the Lord website is filled with truths that he taught me. In this epic roundtable interview, they discuss how our freedom of speech is under threat by the Sodomite lobby which is backed by none other than the vile Zionist Jew establishment itself. The vile sin of Sodomy is constantly promoted by the Jew World Propaganda machine! 

THIS PAGE IS PERSONAL!

I myself was a victim of the Jewish Communist regime in New Jersey, that pursued malicious prosecution against me for preaching Boldy against the sin of Sodomy. I had a very good lawyer and was able to beat the case (I wasted half of my savings). I also prayed imprecatory prayers against the Sodomite who took me to court, I found out a few years after I had won the court case that God killed the sodomite who was seeking to oppress me. This ordinance the enemy sought to use against me is called "Bias Intimidation" it is completely against the Law and any officer who enforces it is committing treason against this Republic of the United States, and they should forfeit their badge! I understand what it is like to be terrorized legally by the Establishment of Evil Christ-rejecting Jews, their Homosexual shock troops, and the brainwashed ZOGbots of the police and court system willing to enforce these unlawful edicts.

Hate Laws - Hate Speech--- Making Criminals of Christians Full documentary

VIDEO BACK-UP, DOWNLOAD IF POSSIBLE AND SHARE AROUND

Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians on Vimeo

Ted Pike - Hate Laws Making Criminals Of Christians (2001) : Ted Pike : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

46. Hate Crime Laws Making Criminals of Christians Part 1 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

47. Hate Crime Laws Making Criminals of Christians Part 2 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

H.A.T.E. LAWS MAKING CRIMINALS OF CHRISTIANS | TED AND ALYNN PIKE | (2001)

Ted Pike Hate Laws Making Criminals of Christians (Parts 1 and 2)

hate laws: making criminals of Christians (BITCHUTE)

JEWS DON’T BELIEVE IN FREEDOM OF SPEECH

By John Kaminski (Check his website out)

Their twisted version of history keeps creating tyranny and wars

I can make any Jew tell a lie in three seconds. Just ask, Tell me about the history of Israel. You won't hear the real answer from a Jew.

The real answer is Israel is a criminal entity subject to no laws but its own, and it basically has none. It was created by terrorists who stole the land from its original owners. Every crime is permissible by a Jew against a non-Jew. That is the core of its teaching in both the Talmud and the Torah. Non-Jews are cattle, the Talmud says. Take a look at the world, and see how those cattle are now being slaughtered, especially in the neighborhood of Israel.

Israeli soldiers specialize in shooting Palestinian children in the head, you know. Most Jews in America are very proud of that, though they don't usually let the newspapers they own in America write about that stuff, except through vicious racism against others, especially Muslims, but also blacks and whites, of which they are neither.

My local TV station told me local Jews were celebrating and supporting Israel's slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza and its invasion of Lebanon, where many children were slaughtered by Jewish bombs while riding in a schoolbus. Such is life in braindead America these days. Zionized. A mental yarmulke on the heads of everyone.

Remember Rachel Corrie, the young girl crushed by the bulldozer? Multiply that by a number too large to contemplate and you have an accurate picture of life in Palestine under the heartless heel of the Jewish/Zionist/Israeli monster, which kills for no reason and smiles at the sight of the blood it spills.

This is the most important social question now facing the human species.

What kind of religion is this Judaism?! It is not like the others Christians, Muslims. Buddhists and Hindus, who advertise salvation to anyone who wants it. Judaism is only for the Jews, not for anybody else. In fact, In Judaism, everybody else is fair game for murder and robbery with no penalty. Witness the Israeli squadron captain who recently was acquitted on a minor manslaughter charge after pumping 13 bullets into the lifeless body of a ten-year-old Palestinian girl.

The greatest scam ever perpetrated on the human race was the notion of anti-Semitism, where a transparent persecution complex created a permanent, self-inflicted injury by which the greatest group of crooks in human history made themselves sacred, and hoodwinked the rest of its species into believing they were The Chosen. The cash registers have been ringing ever since. And there's something about spilled blood these people like.

Five thousand years later, after the magical machinations of Daniel and his magi friends in Babylon invented money and religion at the very same time, the two remain inextricably intertwined. The tribe of Dan, the Danae who populated Greece, the Tuatha de Danaan who are the fairyfolk of Ireland, spread around the world, carrying their ethics with them in the mind memes of the Old Testament. Kill for any reason, and call it holy, as long as it is profitable.

Today our freedom of speech and our freedom of thought is manacled as surely as William Blake recorded the harlot's curse in long-ago London. "Blights with plagues the marriage hearse."

Only today, all is permissible within the new streamlined, alluring and utterly soulless American media spectrum, except for one subject.

The Holocaust. The most untouchable of topics. We may not discuss it. In many countries most of Europe, in fact they'll throw you in jail and throw away the keys in a pile of trivialities, and you'll never see your home again. Just ask Ernst Zundel, or any of his other thought comrades jailed in Germany after being renditioned from elsewhere for simply reporting the unbiased, empirical facts of World War II.

The unbiased empirical facts are that the Germans didn't gas anybody during World War II, that there was no final solution planned other than deportation to Palestine, and that the great shame of Jewish leaders forever throughout history and why they were probably banned by God in the Bible  is that the worldwide Jewish organizations were complicit with Hitler in the herding of Jews and their deaths were largely caused by the Allied bombing of 1945, after which typhus and starvation raged. The founders of Israel wanted those people dead, because they didn't want them in Israel. No valid evidence of gas chambers exists. Plenty of people died; war is like that. AP reported 875,000 Jews total in a 1947 report. And the religion of the Six Million marches on, demolishing whole societies in its ugly path.

And here's another in the endless examples of why Jews don't believe in freedom of speech.

As we speak, Professor Robert Faurisson of France faces years in jail for simply saying show me evidence of gas chambers on Iran's Sahar TV (my favorite station, as a matter of fact). I have spoken of these matters on this same show nine times and said far worse than Faurisson. Maybe I should go to France, eh?

All we are actually asking is for Jews to prove their hysterical interpretations of history are true, but they can't do that, so they bribe people and make laws prohibiting discussion of the subject, because they know they will lose any neutrally judged debate.

This is the Jewish war on freedom of speech. You will believe this false, twisted history, or you will go to jail. If you want to forever erase any notion you may still entertain that Germans mass-gassed Jews, read Paul Grubach's magnificent recap of the debate:

Ironically, it is, I believe, a very favorable sign for the future of Holocaust revisionism that most of the Western power elites refuse to debate the Holocaust revisionists, but only resort to name calling, threats of career destruction and jail sentences. It suggests to the world that Holocaust revisionism cannot be defeated with evidence and reason. The opponents of revisionism are intellectually impotent, and they cannot defeat revisionism with facts, evidence and logic. The "Holocaust" is a weak and flimsy ideology that needs special laws, threats of career destruction and jail sentences to protect it.

http://www.rense.com/general69/gasccm.htm

Freedom of speech? Forget about it. Jews don't believe in freedom of speech. Jews control the Congress, the media, the banks, the movie theaters, the product distribution centers, the big stores, your local governments, the medical and legal professions, your schools. Jews control your lives, in thousands of ways you don't even realize. They speak, and you listen, just like Pavlov taught.

On the surface, they pretend to be slightly above average citizens, excelling in schools tailored for them and arriving in the job spectrum on a high level, guaranteeing their dominance over others. The new mafia is definitely Jewish, and running the government, as well.

This is how it works in Congress, too. No one gets even to run without the approval of the Jews, and its monster organizations, AIPAC and the ADL. The precious few who get past the initial filters usually are crushed in general elections either by an avalanche of Jewish money and negative Jewish media coverage, or, worse, bought off to twist their message in a certain slight way to favor a certain slight group.

For those of you who would bluster and fume that this is anti-Semitism, I say it is evidence of crimes, committed down through history against everyone by one single group which today has much of the world in flames because of its insane avarice.

The real crime is that they are allowed to continue to do what they do. Continued ignorance of this insidious social poison is now in the process of destroying much of the world.

No Matter Who You Vote for, You Get Jonathan Greenblatt (Mary Phagan Edition)

by K.A. Strom and Valdis Bell

I BELIEVE IT was the great writer Daniel Concannon who first said that in America, no matter who you vote for you always get Jonathan Greenblatt.

Greenblatt looks like a particularly filthy gunsel from a 1940s gangster movie. He makes Peter Lorre look handsome. He’s the head of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (or ADL), which is perhaps the foremost anti-Gentile hate operation in America today. It is the ADL who decides what you get to hear or see in the media, and what you are allowed to say in public and on social media. It would be better named the Defamation League, as one of their main activities is defaming and deplatforming and smearing and financially and personally ruining anyone who exposes Jewish crimes or the genocidal nature of the Jewish agenda.

As proof that the ADL gets what it wants, and what it wants is to silence anyone who inhibits the Jewish agenda of a brown America, look at what happened to populist Tucker Carlson last year. The most highly-rated talk show host on the dinosaur media, so well-liked that a recent poll puts his popularity higher than that of the entire Fox News Network where he appeared, Carlson was fired by mega-Zionist and possibly crypto- or part-Jew Rupert Murdoch without reason being given. Jonathan Greenblatt has been pushing for Carlson to be fired for at least two years. Take a look at this softball CNN interview with Greenblatt from 12 April 2021. CNN is owned and run by Jews.

This interview took place in April 2021. Last year, Jonathan Greenblatt finally got exactly what he wanted..

Greenblatt gets all worked up emotionally when he tells Brian Stelter, “Tucker Carlson has got to go!” calling for him to be deplatformed, and literally a few seconds later screeches “This is not cancel culture.” Right. Greenblatt and the ADL goddamned invented cancel culture, for the gods’ sake. It’s the very basis of their existence. Apparently Tucker had mentioned the increasingly obvious fact that there a media agenda to replace the heritage population of the US and Europe and other Western nations. (It’s okay for the controlled media to mention this, they often do, so long as they frame it as a good and inevitable thing. But Tucker hadn’t made the obligatory ritual incantations, and that might stir up the peasants and get them thinking maybe, just maybe, someone is trying to hurt them — something that Greenblatt and his ilk cannot tolerate.)

Now, I’m not a hod carrier for Tucker Carlson. He articulates many of the problems we face well. He informs us about a few parts of the media’s agenda that the rest of the Jewish-controlled media try to downplay or keep hidden. But, like Lucy Van Pelt and her football with Charlie Brown, at the last moment he always pulls away and leaves us without knowing who is behind these things and why they do what they do. In some cases he out-and-out misdirects our people into thinking that Democrats are the real problem — not Jewish power — and that Republicans, some of them anyway, are the real solution. He scrupulously and cleverly and rather disgustingly dances around the issue of Jewish/Zionist power. Sometimes he tells us that it’s some shadowy “woke” conspiracy or airheaded “groupthink” trendiness that’s “behind it all.” (Truth be told, we as people need “groupthink.” All peoples need groupthink — that is, thinking of themselves as a group and committing themselves to their group’s survival — in order to even exist at all. Tucker Carlson says that’s a bad thing, promoting some vaguely libertarian strain of populism — or maybe it’s a populist strain of libertarianism; it doesn’t really matter, either one is death for us. So I am not a big fan of Tucker Carlson.

But Carlson went too far for Jonathan Greenblatt and the ADL. And he was hugely popular. So he had to go. And, going against — insanely against, I might add — their own economic interests, the Murdochs fired him. Pleasing Jews is more important, apparently, than billions in revenue.

And it is this same Greenblatt and same ADL that is allowed to give “training courses” to police officers nationwide, telling the officers just who it is who is “dangerous” and who should get especially intense law enforcement scrutiny. It is this same ADL that meets with social media executives — including Elon Musk — and tells them who it is who should have a voice and who should be stifled or silenced. It is this same ADL that tells our national and state and local legislators what laws should be passed and what speech should be banned.

Speaking of pleasing Jews, witness the shocking behavior of Florida governor Ron DeSantis. For the second time in history — and DeSantis did it the first time, too — an American governor has signed a bill into law while in a foreign country. It was a bill supported by the ADL and specifically crafted to make distribution of fliers criticizing Jews into a felony. And guess which country DeSantis was in when he signed it? If you guessed Israel, you’re right. DeSantis, who, like Tucker Carlson, makes a lot of noise in apparent opposition to certain of the most outrageous parts of the Jewish agenda, knows who he has to please. Don’t fool yourself; DeSantis still has ambitions to be a major elite political player. His signing of this flagrantly immoral and illegal restriction on our speech while in Israel is deeply significant: a symbolic bowing to his masters, in a place sacred to his masters, signaling he wants their approval for a “move up” in status, something that only they really decide.

I’ll embed the tweet from neocon Jew Rep. Andy Fine, who said: “made a secret trip to JERUSALEM (!!!) to deliver @GovRonDeSantis HB 269, the strongest antisemitism bill in the United States. To Florida’s Nazi thugs, I have news: attack Jews on their property and you’re going to prison. Never again means never again.” All of this surmounts a picture of DeSantis signing the sacred bill, with two smirking Jews looking on. Do I have to tell you that the bill has nothing to do with “attacking” Jews, but only with distributing literature that criticizes them or exposes their activities?

Some of you may be wondering what all this has to do with Mary Phagan. And who is she, anyway? Well, you need to understand the murder of Mary Phagan in order to understand how we got from the Land of the Free to the point where a greasy, sleazy item like Greenblatt gets to decide what our laws should be and what you can say without getting fired or going to prison.

It all began when 19th-century Americans, woefully unaware of reality when it came to Jews, mistakenly thought that Jews were just another kind of European and let them stream into our country in huge numbers. Jews, knowing they were a separate race and with fanatical racial loyalty, immediately began to organize and acquire power for themselves, especially power over the press and eventually all mass media as they emerged.

Initially, Jews in the southern US adapted themselves to the reality of Jim Crow and positioned themselves publicly as “White” and supportive of White institutions.

But all that changed at high noon on 26 April, 1913, in Atlanta, Georgia.

It happened on the second floor of the National Pencil Company building on Forsyth Street. It was a sweatshop where child laborers, mostly White girls, spent their youth making pencils for the company’s Jewish owners for 60 hours a week and more, earning only pennies an hour.

13-year-old Mary Phagan was one such girl. She came that day to the office to collect her pathetically meager $1.20 pay. There she met the sweatshop’s Jewish boss and stockholder, Leo Frank, in his office on the second floor. Leo Frank was also the president of the Atlanta chapter of the B’nai B’rith, a Jewish organization that would spawn the ADL later that same year.

It was a holiday and no one else was on that entire floor. Frank paid her, and then took her into the factory’s “metal room,” in the rear part of the second floor, as far as possible from the stairway and elevator, and from prying eyes and ears, on the pretext of checking to see if the metal supplies she needed for her work had come in. He closed the doors behind them as they walked.

Near the rear wall, standing in front of a metal lathe next to the toilet entrance, Leo Frank did to Mary Phagan what he, according to numerous witnesses, had often done with his teenage girl employees: He attempted to take sexual liberties with her. She resisted. Frank knocked her down forcibly, hitting her in the eye and striking her head against the unyielding metal lathe, opening a bloody gash that he may or may not have seen at first. While she was stunned, he pulled her garments up above her waist and raped her right on the red-stained floor in front of the toilet, lying in her own flowing blood.

When he was “done,” seeing the blood and doubtlessly realizing his predicament should Mary tell others of his actions, he found a piece of the twine used to pack supplies in his factory, wound it tightly around Mary’s neck, and strangled her to death. He then tore off a piece of her lace underwear, placed it around her neck as if it were a lace necklet and so it covered the marks of the strangling.

He then summoned the factory’s Black sweeper, Jim Conley, to enlist his aid in the moving and, he hoped, the burning of Mary Phagan’s body. Conley knew that Frank liked to “chat” in private with the prettier of his young White employees, as he had kept watch for Frank on several occasions while such “chatting” took place. And, in fact, he was keeping watch for him near the factory’s first-floor entrance at that very moment. Frank told Conley that he had struck the girl and accidentally killed her. The lace “necklet” might have served to conceal the strangling — at least conceal it from Conley. It could never fool police investigators. But, if Conley had burned the body for Frank as planned (as it turned out, he never did), there might never be any police investigators. Conley and Frank moved Mary’s body to the basement.

Frank and his legal team tried to frame the Black night watchman, Newt Lee, for the murder. Among other things, they forged his time card, and planted a fake bloody shirt at his residence. When that framing attempt failed, they tried to frame Jim Conley — and, 111 years later, they’re still trying to frame him. They planted a fake “bloody club” and pay envelope near the place where Conley kept watch for Frank that day. But that fake was exposed, too. The true evidence kept building up, and the proof was overwhelming that Frank was the killer. He was convicted and sentenced to death.

But Frank had something that ordinary defendants, Black or White, never have. He was not an “ordinary citizen.” He was a Jew, a member of the supposedly “chosen people.” He was also an actual official of the Jewish power structure — the head of Atlanta’s division of the B’nai B’rith. He had the already massive power, money, media ownership, and political influence of the organized Jewish community nationwide behind him. They refused to let the verdict stand. They funded a multimillion-dollar legal and PR campaign to get him a new trial, to make millions of gullible people believe he was innocent and a saintlike “victim of anti-Semitism,” and to get his sentence commuted. They were only partially successful. All his numerous and expensive appeals, which went all the way up to the US Supreme Court, failed. And the death sentence was carried out by an outraged citizenry after a corrupt governor commuted it. The Jews did fool a great number of Americans about Frank, however.

And the Frank case galvanized Jews to see heritage Americans as their enemies. The Leo Frank case was not only the first time the Jewish power structure flexed its muscles so openly to change public opinion and to get what it wanted from the political and legal systems. It was also when they decided that their alliance with White people was at an end. From that day forward, and intensifying greatly after World War 2, the Jews have been ramping up a (slighty) covert war on White people at the very same time that they made overt war on Arabs and others in the Middle East.

Everything else flows from that day. What that Jew pervert did to Mary Phagan on the metal room floor that day 111 years ago this week led directly to Jonathan Greenblatt telling you what you can and cannot say today — led directly, in fact, to the founding of the ADL just a few months after Mary Phagan breathed her last.

And now, as Paul Harvey used to say, you know the rest of the story.

ADL and Cult Awareness Network both Jewish terrorist organizations!

CULT AWARENESS NETWORK BRAINWASHERS URGED ATTACK ON WACO

"The tragedy in Waco, Texas between officers of the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, FBI agents and the Davidian religious sect resulting in the deaths and wounding of officers and sect members is the direct responsibility of the very experts that are now reaping admiration for their involvement," stated Dr. George Robertson, a well-known U.S. expert on religious freedom issues and anti-cult groups.

As the events have unfolded, Robertson says, it is becoming more and more apparent that the major questions concerning who was behind the massive raid on the Branch Davidian church, have real answers that point directly to the Cult Awareness Network (CAN). Questions like, How did the ATF agents come to believe that storming the compound was the only answer? and What was the source of all the allegations which brought the charges in the first place? The cult hysteria surrounding the Texas sect began a little more than a year ago when Rick Ross, deprogrammer from CAN began targeting the Davidian Sect for potential kidnappings and deprogramming paid for by relatives of members in the group. One of those victims, who reportedly had been successfully transformed as an enemy of the sect during a deprogramming at the home of CANs national spokesperson, Priscilla Coates in Southern California, began reporting alleged accusations against the Davidians. The charges included illegal weapons stockpiling, child abuse, immorality, and authoritative control over the group by its leader, David Koresh. The charges were not unlike those that are systematically levelled at every group by former members who have experienced the brainwashing of a CAN deprogramming session.

Whether the charges are true or false, Robertson said, remains to be seen. The group had illegal weapons charges brought previously against them and they were dismissed. The charges of child abuse are apparently false since the Texas Department of Social Services have examined the children which were released and found to be perfectly normal, happy and very well educated children. It would appear from those who have left the compound during the siege that people there are free to leave at any time they desire to do so. The allegations do not appear to have merit and if they are found to be true, there are legal remedies for handling the situation. According to Dr. Isaac Brooks, Director of the Deprogramming Survivors Network in Washington, D.C., the tactics of the deprogramming network mechanism is to stir a paranoia, fear, and publicity in efforts to get relatives and brainwash them into leaving the group or belief system they have adopted.

The deprogramming process, Dr. Brooks maintains, is nothing more than old fashioned brainwashing used on prisoners of war. They kidnap the victim or deceive them into going with them and then hold them against their will in total isolation, while they bombard the victim for hours or even days on end with hate literature, video tapes, and propaganda against the group they had joined. The ordeal that the victims must endure is not unlike that experienced by Patricia Hearst during her SLA kidnapping some years ago and which resulted in her joining forces with her kidnappers. Psychologists have reported that it is not uncommon for a victim in such situations to develop an identity with their captors and often become their most ardent supporters.

Ross reported on U.S. Televisions Up To The Minute programme that he had consulted with ATF agents on the Waco sect and told them about the guns in the compound. His information had come from a former member which he had deprogrammed from the group, he said. In contrast, former McLennan County District Attorney, Victor Feazell, called the ATF storm troopers and warned prior to the massacre that the Feds are preparing to kill them and bury their own mistakes. If theyd called and talked to them, the Davidians wouldve given them what they wanted, Feazell told Associated Press. Feazell reported in a Houston newspaper that he had handled similar charges against the group earlier and the members were acquitted on all charges. We treated them like human beings, instead of storming the place. They were extremely polite people, Feazell said.

According to various media reports the central deprogramming adviser to the ATF and FBI on the Branch Davidians was, in fact, the self-same Rick Ross. Ross is a convicted jewel thief.

Renowned investigative journalist Alexander Cockburn wrote a revealing column in the Los Angeles Times shortly after the Waco holocaust entitled From Salem to Waco, By Way of the Nazis. The subtitle was:

The Davidians were a cult and thus exempt from justice and normal rules of evidence.

Cockburn began by noting:

It now seems likely that the M-60 tank knocked over kerosene for the compounds lamps... and almost everyone burned alive. This appalling event took place on April 19, 1993, the 50th anniversary of the Nazi assault on the Jewish ghetto in Warsaw. The Nazis too regarded cults as ripe candidates for persecution. On June 20, 1937, the SS Reichsfuehrer Reinhard Heydrich ordered the banning and persecution of...the Seventh-day Adventists from which the Branch Davidians sprang.

Cockburn also exposed the role of the Cult Awareness Network and Rick Ross. The role in Waco of the Cult Awareness Network, whose members are respectfully cited in the press as experts, may well have been crucial. The networks president, Patricia Ryan, was quoted in the Houston Post on April 9 as saying that the FBI should use any means necessary to arrest Koresh, including lethal force. Soon after the initial February 28 raid, another deprogrammer named Rick Ross, long associated with the network, said on television that he consulted with the ATF before the raid. The networks former executive director, Priscilla Coates, raised allegations of child abuse....

Dr. James Lewis of the Institute for the Study of American Religion stated that: Whatever Ross may have communicated to the ATF, it is certain he promoted the worst stereotypes of alternative religions...scholars have time, and time again rejected this stereotype as simply unfounded. Ross' advice to the ATF helped create an adversarial position between the ATF and FBI, and the Davidians. In an interview with the Waco Tribune Herald, he described the Davidians as a very dangerous group and issued dire warnings of their potential violence. Ross was publicly described by CAN Executive Director Cynthia Kisser as among the half-dozen best deprogrammers in the country. Ross is a member of two national committees for the Union of American Hebrew Congregations and an outspoken critic of Christian fundamentalist groups. Ross has boasted of more than 200 deprogrammings.

The Waco mass murder did not satiate the deprogramming zeal of the Cult Awareness Network. For as Alexander Cockburn wrote in his article: And as a final horrible irony in this saga of Nazi-like affront to religious tolerance, the deprogrammers are demanding that they be allowed to exercise their dark arts on the burned Davidian survivors so that they testify correctly and desist from maintaining - as they have that no mass suicide was under way.

What is CAN?

A review of CANs origins shows that the Cult Awareness Network actually began as the Citizens Freedom Foundation (CFF) in 1974. Convicted felon Ted Patrick was instrumental in the group's formation. According to founding member Henrietta Crampton, as reported in The New York Times on September 2, 1974, Mr. Patrick had been the prime force in organizing the group.

At every CAN convention, Patrick has been an honored guest. He only missed the 1990 CAN convention because he was involved with an unsuccessful deprogramming attempt on an Amish woman and her daughter. Patrick, who has faced numerous legal actions, arrests and convictions for his crimes, describes deprogramming in his 1976 book Let Our Children Go:

Deprogramming is the term, and it may be said to involve kidnapping at the very least, quite often assault and battery, almost invariably conspiracy to commit a crime, and illegal restraint.

In his book, Patrick explained his methods of removing persons from religious groups, including his account of the kidnapping of a born-again Christian who was resisting abduction by bracing himself against the getaway car. As he describes it in Let Our Children Go, Patrick forced his victim into the car by squeezing the man's genitals until he let out a howl. His victim then doubled up, releasing his hold on the car roof.

Then I hit, Patrick wrote, shoving him headfirst into the back seat of the car and piling in on top of him. Another one of Patrick's attacks was an unsuccessful deprogramming attempt in 1975 on a Catholic woman from Canada, which resulted in an official government prohibition against Patrick entering Canada. Ted Patrick, like his CAN associates, has no preference in who he deprograms, as long as the money is good. Since its founding, CFF changed to CAN, obtained more prominent sponsors and broadened its affiliations; but it has always remained the same - a clearinghouse and referral service for people who, for a fee, will do whatever it takes to break a targeted individual from his or her beliefs.

Bucknell University religion professor Larry Shin told the Philadelphia Inquirer in 1992 that deprogramming is the most destructive of the legacies of the great American cult scare.... CAN is much closer to a destructive cult than most of the groups they attack. From the mid-1980s onward, CAN has functioned as the most active of a throng of so-called anti-cult organizations which sprang from the ravages of the counterculture. Such groups as the Jewish Community Relations Councils (JCRC) Task Force on Missionaries and Cults, the American Family Foundation, the International Cult Education Project and the Interfaith Coalition of Concern about Cults, all share interlocking boards of directors and funding. Through these associations, CAN has enjoyed the support and protection of powerful elements of the U.S. eastern liberal financial establishment.

The former President of CAN, Michael Rokos, abruptly resigned his position amid a flurry of publicity exposing that he had been found guilty on charges of soliciting sex with a Baltimore vice squad officer posing as a minor. According to an affidavit from arresting officer Joseph G. Wyatt, Rokos solicited him, saying, I want you to tie me up, put clothespins on my nipples, and make me suck your d*ck.

CANs MK-Ultra Hired Guns

In addition to its criminal connections, CAN relies upon and draws support from a small band of psychiatrists and psychologists known for anti-religious stands, bigotry, and involvement in violent psychiatric practices. Also, many of the CIAs pioneer experimenters from the MK-Ultra project [see New Dawn No. 15] are today board members and advisers to the Cult Awareness Network and the American Family Foundation. For example, psychiatrist Louis Jolyon West, who has long been active in the American Psychiatric Association, has been instrumental in advising and setting the direction of the Cult Awareness Network. In 1977, Dr. West was exposed on the front page of the New York Times as being funded by the CIA to perform experiments in mind destruction using LSD, as part of the MK-Ultra project. In John Marks book The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, West was exposed as a pioneer of LSD and mind control experiments funded by the CIA. While there has been much discussion of the catastrophic drug culture of the 1960s, almost no attention has been given to the role CIA-linked psychiatrists like Dr. West played in creating this chaotic era. West is also notorious for promoting racism under the guise of treatment. In a 1972 proposal for a centre to study violence, West unveiled an Orwellian plan including electronic mind-control implants, chemical castration and psychosurgery to make troublesome minorities more tractable. In a 1983 speech to the Citizens Freedom Foundation, psychiatrist West proposed his plan for eradicating religion. Using a medical model, West claimed that certain religions should be treated just as one would treat cancerous cells: destruction. In the 1960s, as mentioned above, in one of his mind-control experiments, done at the Oklahoma City Zoo, West killed an elephant with a massive overdose of LSD. West had himself taken LSD the day before. West, who serves on the advisory board of the Cult Awareness Network and on the advisory board of another anti-religious group, the American Family Foundation, has been a keynote speaker at CAN conferences and a mentor for such groups for more than 15 years. During his career, he has not only been associated with drug experiments, but also with brutal psychiatric practices such as psychosurgery (lobotomy) and electric shock.

Who's Who Among Brainwashers

Another CAN favorite and frequent speaker at CAN conventions is psychiatrist Robert Lifton, a close associate of West. Lifton is also linked to the Anti-Defamation League and is often cited as an authority on mind control. However, scholars have rejected Liftons attempt to extend his studies of American prisoners of war - men subjected to extreme coercion and duress at the hands of Chinese forces during the Korean War - to such activities as child rearing, Catholic orders and other religious movements. Indeed, authorities have characterized his comparisons as far-fetched, absurd and cannot be taken seriously. Making no attempt to hide where his sympathies lie, Lifton was a prominent speaker at a conference on youth religions in Germany in 1978 sponsored by the German Union of Child Psychiatry. During his talk, he expressed his anti-religious views to a group whose members included former Nazi psychiatrists who had been active in formulating and propagating Nazi ideas on eugenics. Lifton worked with Dr. Margaret Singer and others at the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre on Chinese Communist thought reform, the assault upon identity and belief. His book, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, is the bible for those who believe in brainwashing. Deprogramming victims frequently are forced to read Liftons writings during their ordeal. What Lifton describes in his book as thought reform, is remarkably similar to what CAN calls deprogramming.

Another figure depended upon heavily by the Cult Awareness Network to lend an aura of credibility to its activities and to give some justification to its hate crimes is psychologist Margaret Singer. Singers unsubstantiated theories have provided expert justifications for deprogrammings - as well as her means of making a living. She has been a frequent speaker or participant at CAN events, and both CFF and CAN have promoted her in their newsletters. Singer, who is also an advisory board member of the American Family Foundation, got her start as an Army psychiatrist, studying Korean War veterans and prisoners of war. She worked in projects with Drs. Edgar Schein and Albert Biderman, both exposed in Marks The Search for the Manchurian Candidate as running the parallel military MK-Ultra programs. Singers writings are also cited by the CIA front, the Society for the Study of Human Ecology, Inc. Rabbi Maurice Davis is a member of the CAN advisory board who works closely with Dr. John G. Clark of Harvard in arranging deprogrammings. Davis worked in the MK-Ultra program at the U.S. Public Health Services prison in Lexington, Kentucky with Dr. Harris Isbell, who was administering psychotropic drugs to inmates. One subject was kept on LSD for 77 days. Herbert Rosedale, president of the American Family Foundation, is a partner in the New York law firm Parker, Flatau, Chapin and Klimpl, chief representative of Israeli-owned Bank Leumi and Bank Hapoalim. After Galen Kellys indictment for conspiracy to kidnap Lewis du Pont Smith, Rosedale wrote to the court a glowing character-reference letter praising CAN-linked kidnapper Kelly. Rosedale shares with Galen Kelly an inveterate animus towards members of new religious movements. In a 1982 article he went so far as to state that members of a religious faith with which he disagreed were diseased and responsible for infecting the community. Rosedales associate on the Advisory Board of the American Family Foundation (AFF) is Dr. Louis J. West, who has been quoted in the press describing the purposes and activities of AFF and CAN as [to] kidnap and deprogram cult members. Rabbi Arnold James Rudin and his wife Marcia Rudin are leaders of the interreligious group within the Cult Awareness Network and the American Family Foundation and frequent spokesmen for the American Jewish Committee. Marcia Rudin is head of the International Cult Education Project, a spinoff of the Bnai Brith.

CAN - ADL Link

Of special significance to the Waco tragedy is the close relationship between the Cult Awareness Network and the Anti-Defamation League of Bnai Brith. Not only do the two networks have over-lapping members but they also share intelligence on targeted groups. Herb Brin, a leading backer of the ADL and publisher of the Los Angeles Heritage newspaper revealed the ADLs involvement in the Branch Davidian affair. In a signed headline story which appeared in the April 16 edition of his newspaper, Brin inadvertently exposed the role that the ADL played in helping engineer the FBI/BATF slaughter at the Branch Davidian church complex in Waco. In an article hailing the ADLs now-infamous [see New Dawn No.19] spy network, Brin stated:

U.S. and Texas authorities have precise documentation (from ADL, of course) on the Branch Davidian cult in Waco and how it operated in the past. Brins revelation comes as no surprise once we understand the ADLs intimate relationship with CAN. It now seems clear that both the Anti-Defamation League and the Cult Awareness Network did not want the Branch Davidians to come out alive. Had David Koresh and the Branch Davidians gone to trial (which is very much what they desired in order to tell their side of the story), the course of legal discovery would have revealed the way the ADL and CAN had been prodding the FBI and BATF to action. The funding for the Cult Awareness Network and the American Family Foundation comes from families who hire their deprogrammers, and from donations from establishment foundations. Many of the latter are connected to the Anti-Defamation League. The American Family Foundation (AFF) has been funded, for the most part, by a handful of top Wall Street family foundations. Among them are the Scaife Family Foundation, the J.M. Foundation, and the Pew Foundation. In recent years, the San Francisco-based Swig Foundation has provided crucial support. Foundation trustee Melvin Swig is a national commission member of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and a national executive board member of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The single largest financial promoters of the AFF for the past decade have been the Bodman Foundation and the Achellis Foundation. The Bodman and Achellis foundations combined to grant over a half-million dollars to the AFF during the first decade of its existence. The two separate foundations have overlapping trustees and officers and are both housed in the New York City law offices of Morris and McVeigh, which also acts as general counsel for both foundations. Both the Bodman and Achellis foundations and the Morris and McVeigh law firm are chock-full of New York-based intelligence and banking families, who generally avoid the political limelight, preferring to shape national, political and cultural policy through private foundation grants.

Australia's CAN

A new religious vilification (or anti-cult) group is currently setting up a network around Australia. Calling itself CultAware this Australian version of CAN is headed by Sydney-based Tony and Joan McClelland and is associated with Melbourne counsellor and Lubavitch Rabbi Raphael Aron of Gateway Counselling, and self-proclaimed Christian cult experts Jan Groenveld of Brisbane and Rev. Adrian Van Leen of Perths Concerned Christian Growth Ministries. How any genuine, self-respecting Jew or Christian could be associated with the likes of the Cult Awareness Network or the American Family Foundation is truly amazing. Yet, in his book Combating Cult Mind Control, CAN-linked deprogrammer Steven Hassan references both Concerned Christian Growth Ministries of Perth and Raphael Aron, former director of Melbourne's Jewish Centre.

Only days after the Waco tragedy Larry Tye wrote a hate-mongering piece titled Waco Reborn? which appeared in most of Australia's major daily newspapers. The writer opens by warning his readers, If you think the tragic debacle at Waco, Texas, was bad, consider who could be next. Are there other cults with similar destructive potential? You bet there are. A few columns later Tye quotes notorious CAN advisor Dr. Louis J. West, a professor of psychiatry at UCLA and respected authority on cults: There are many Jonestowns and Wacos potentially sitting out there. Then betraying the anti-religion, totalitarian agenda, Tye informs us that: What really made him mad, Dr. West added, was that law enforcement officials and community leaders were so obsessed with safeguarding freedoms of religion and speech that they didn't respond to cults until it was too late.

Yes, unfortunately, as long as religion haters and thought police of the ilk of West and CAN are permitted to influence law enforcement agencies, the media and government departments, the possibility of another Waco type mass murder cannot be ruled out. Are there other cults with similar destructive potential? Yes, there most certainly are, the most dangerous and criminal being the Cult Awareness Network!

                                                                                                                                         "FREE SPEECH"

CAN MEAN PRISON TIME OR WORSE

At his trial in Germany, Ernst was not allowed to present evidence that would have proven his innocence. The Judge sternly told him that, “Truth is not a defense.”

When his lawyer, Sylvia Stolz, objected, explaining she could not prove her client’s innocence without presenting evidence, the Judge was infuriated. Stolz was also found guilty and sent to prison. Her crime—attempting to defend Ernst.

Hundreds of men and women have done time in prison in Germany, Austria, France, Belgium, Australia, New Zealand, and elsewhere. Many were accused of denying the holocaust of World War II. None were permitted to enter truth in evidence.

Bribed and Bullied by the Jews

Jewish organizations have been very busy since the turn of the twentieth century. They have money and are powerful and have bullied and bribed dozens of nations to pass so-called “Anti-Semitism” laws. These laws make it a crime in many cases to criticize Israel’s foreign policy or to speak negatively of the Jews. Usually, they are worded so as to condemn “hate speech.”

What is “hate speech?” Why, that’s whatever the Jews say it is. In 1917, the very first piece of legislation approved by the new communist regime of Lenin and Trotsky was something called the “Anti-Semitism Act.” Just telling a Jewish joke was enough to have the joke teller carted off to Siberia, if not promptly hung on a thick rope.

Lenin, of course, was a Jew, as were almost all the communists in power in Soviet Russia. But it was against the law to say, or to tell others, that Lenin was a Jew. Only after Gorbachev came to power were the rules relaxed. Now, almost everyone in Russia knows that Lenin was a Jew. The curator of the Lenin Museum, in Red Square, Moscow, even says so.

Shhh! Don’t Tell Americans Lenin Was a Jew

But strangely, even today the fact of Lenin’s Jewish genetics cannot be told publicly in the United States. Doubt that? Well go to your library and research 30 or 40 fine history books about Lenin, his life, and the rise of communism. None speak of Lenin’s Jewish heritage.

Stubbornly, however, I utter the unmentionable. You see, I am a “dangerous” truthteller, widely recognized for my audacity and brashness in revealing such secrets. But the powers that be will not let me speak of this on the major TV networks, nor in the top newspapers and magazines. Shhh! They whisper. That”s forbidden!

Lenin hid the fact he and his government were Jewish because he was very busy killing the goyim (Gentiles), mostly Christian, a crime that was covered up by the world’s mostly Jewish-owned press. He and his cohorts murdered some 66 million, according to renowned Russian historian, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.

Solzhenitsyn himself spent ten years in Siberia, in a cold, roach-infested gulag prison camp. He was sentenced when censors read his mail and claim to have discovered a comment in which Solzhenitsyn mildly criticized red leader, Stalin. That was good for what the communists’ courts called a “tenner” (ten years prison).

Why Should Freedom of Speech be Allowed?

Al Neuharth, publisher and founder of USA Today newspaper (March 29, 1998), wrote of his visit to Pravda, in Moscow during the late communist era:

“Twenty years ago when we visited Pravda, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party and of the government, editors proudly pointed out these words by Lenin, chiseled into the newsroom wall: ‘Why should freedom of speech and freedom of the press be allowed? Why should a government which is doing what it believes right allow itself to be criticized? It would not allow opposition by lethal weapons, and ideas are more fatal than guns.’”

President George W. Bush apparently agreed. In speaking at the United Nations, the American President solemnly stated:

“Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories regarding the attacks of 9/11...”

I suspect that the President, liar and warmonger who sent hundreds of thousands of soldiers, marines, and airmen into harms way, in a war based on White House lies and fabrications, would have loved to see you and me put behind bars. We deserved it, he would say, for believing the truth and for reading about it.

Seems there is only a fine and gossamer line today keeping us from prison. There is that thing, for example, called The First Amendment, which Bush said was, “no better than a piece of used toilet paper.”

Actually, that thin line of Free Speech is steadily being crossed today in America, and the Jews, their liberal judges, and the government bureaucrats are working hard to eradicate it entirely.

Things You Can’t Say in America

Just this week, the CEO of Gallup, the polling organization, told CNBC-TV that the Obama Administration’s jobs numbers are a total “lie.” He stated that the Department of Labor’s statistics are fictitious and that twice as many as reported are out of work. Then, he told the reporter he was afraid to tell the truth because he might just “disappear” forever.

I see also that the IRS is still at it, harassing and intimidating. Some Tea Party groups are still being muzzled by the government five years after applying for 501(c)(3) status. So Free Speech continues to be stifled and punished.

Jews Hate the Truth

The Jews are the ones behind most proposed hate crime legislation. They hate the truth and want to prevent the truth from being told. Recently, the Conference of European Rabbis passed a resolution demanding that journalists and others be severely punished for “hate speech against the Jews.”

Now notice that the Jews did not object to “hate speech” against Christians and Moslems, as frequently practiced by Jewish criminals in Europe, the U.S., and around the globe.

These rabbis despise only those few who might, for instance, be so daring as to mention the ongoing ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinians by Israel (oops, I just committed an anti-Semitic hate crime by mentioning that!).

In Canada recently, a brave man named Arthur Topham wrote truth about the Jews. Topham is awaiting trial in a Canadian court for his “horrible” crimes, and truth is not a defense! And, in Britain, Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, a noted historian of science with a degree from Cambridge, lost his position at University College in London, after his newest book was released. It’s title: Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust—Myth and Reality. Meanwhile, in France, a celebrated comedian, M’Bala M’Bala, has been arrested, also for questioning the “accepted” historical facts about the holocaust. History, like truth is exactly what the Jews say it is, no more, no less.

Communists or Jews?... or Both?

Sounds to me like the communists are back! Indeed, have they ever left? Which reminds me of what a famous rabbi stated in a rousing and acclaimed speech he gave at a major conference of Jews. Defending the works of communism, Rabbi Stephen Wise trumpeted, “Some may call it Communism, but I call it what it is: Judaism!” 

(NOTE: RABBI STEPHEN WISE WAS AMERICA'S TOP RABBIS IN THE 40S AND 50 AND A CLOSE PERSONAL FRIEND OF PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT)

"Free Speech" Can Mean Prison Time...or Worse

RICK ROSS: THE CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATHIC JEWISH CULT "EXPERT"

Rick Ross is a self-described expert on cults, he got his start in the Cult Awareness Network and now operates the Cult Education organization based in Trenton, New Jersey.  Ross was very popular in the 80s and 90s and is frequently brought on the media to discuss religious cults. Ross blatantly admits on his website that he has committed more than a dozen involuntary deprogrammings (kidnappings) of adult individuals, mainly Christians, and at least that many more on minors. A review of Ross’ educational background shows that quite apart from being anti-Christian (he refers to Christians as “Bible bangers”), he has no educational credentials in religion. To the contrary, his only formal degree is a high school diploma. Self-aggrandizement and personal financial reward seem to be Ross’ primary motives for his attacks on Christians. Rick Ross is also a convicted criminal, namely a jewel thief and has been the subject of at least three arrests, including an attempted burglary, embezzlement of $100,000 worth of jewelry, and kidnapping.

In the 1980s, Ross became involved in a new scheme to make money. He became involved with a network of criminal deprogrammers called the Cult Awareness Network. In a letter from Rick Ross to the Cult Awareness Network executive director, Priscilla Coates, dated July 30, 1987, Ross complained about not getting deprogramming referrals from CAN and that
"some parents are so cheap they prefer to let their kids 'bang the bible' than pay." This letter clearly shows that Ross was using CAN to get more business for his personal profit, it also shows his demeaning contempt for Christians.
In another letter from Ross to Coates, dated April 28, 1988, Ross describes his strategy to manipulate the media to promote his business as a deprogrammer. He told Coates about his idea to get on television as someone that:
"had deprogrammed fundamentalist Christians" in order to "stimulate some [deprogramming] cases in California."

On January 18, 1991. Jason Scott, an 18-year-old member of a Pentecostal Church, arrived at his family home in Bellevue, Washington, and was jumped by three men hired by Ross. They wrestled him to the ground and dragged him inside. The three men were Mark Workman, Chuck Simpson, and Clark Rotroff.

Jason's mother, Kathy Tonkin, who was also in the house, came outside and told witnesses watching the incident that Jason was going to be okay and that he was going to be taken out of a cult.

Chuck Simpson placed handcuffs on Jason's wrists, and the men dragged him down the stairs on his back, into the downstairs living room and into a van. The men, including Rick Ross, climbed into the van, where Jason was pinned face down by the 300-pound Clark's knee on his back and tied a nylon rope tied around his ankles. Clark, who told Jason to "stop praying and shut up", gagged him with duct tape from ear to ear. Jason was not allowed to look out of the van windows to see where he was being taken.

The kidnappers informed Jason that his church was a cult. Jason asked them if they were going to force him to not go back to his church by making him change his mind. Rick Ross answered "yes." The kidnappers proceeded to ridicule Jason's religious beliefs. The next morning, the kidnapper's brainwashing procedure began again. Ross ignored Jason's request to have his rights read to him by the police, saying that if Jason did not cooperate, he would be handcuffed to the bed frame.

On January 23, Jason observed his mother on the phone scheduling plane tickets for Jason to go to Wellspring "Rehabilitation Center" in Ohio and for the kidnappers to return to Phoenix. Wellspring has been called "a concentration camp for Christians." It is run by psychologist Paul Martin who receives individuals and keeps them there until their faith is "broken."

On January 23, the kidnappers took Jason to eat at the Home Port Restaurant to celebrate Jason's "deprogramming" from the Pentecostal Church. Jason fled across the street and called the police. A policeman arrived, took Jason's story, and put him in the back of his jeep. This is described in detail in the police report made by Jason Scott and in a separate report written by Jason about the incident, entitled, "Testimony of Jason Scott".

Mark Workman and Chuck Simpson were arrested that day. Rick Ross once again evaded criminal charges but he was the recipient of a civil suit for the attempted deprogramming.
In 1994, Scott filed a civil lawsuit against Ross (and including the Cult Awareness Network) for the "involuntary deprogramming" for Conspiracy to violate his civil rights as well as Outrage and Negligence.
A jury found Ross and the other defendants liable for civil rights violations and negligence. The victim, Jason Scott, was awarded $875,000 in compensatory damages and $4 million in punitive damages. An additional award of $1 million in punitive damages was levied against the Cult Awareness Network. CAN lost their appeals and later filed bankruptcy and closed down its operation.
Instead of honoring the court judgments resulting from his criminal behavior in the Jason Scott case, Ross filed for bankruptcy. This even included disposing of a $17,500 debt to his own elderly mother.
Ross appears to be without remorse for his acts of kidnapping and involuntary imprisonment, which are crimes as well as human rights violation. In his own words, Ross admits to the illegal kidnapping at least 12 adults since the "wrongdoing" he engaged in in his twenties.
In an August 2003 news article, Ross answered allegations of his lack of credibility due to his previous convictions, including conspiracy to commit grand theft for embezzlement of property from a jewelry company, by stating:
"I regret what I did in my youth. I admitted my wrongdoing and restored everything to those who lost something. "Ross omitted mention of the Jason Scott kidnapping and two dozen other kidnappings for which charges or suits were not filed.

Rick Ross’ Pro-Jewish, Anti-Christian Religious Paranoia: “The Missionary Threat”

We have mentioned Rick Ross’ Jewish heritage before, but it is telling that his efforts to stand against “destructive cults” carries a potent anti-Christian charge.

In Ross,’ The Missionary Threat, a treatise published by the Institute for First Amendment Studies in 1995 (now defunct), the first sentence reveals the that the incident involving his grandmother being targeted for “conversion” in 1982 has never been far from his mind.

“Jews around the world are now faced by the greatest missionary threat in history.”[2]

Further into this shrill and alarmist screed, Ross lays out his starting point for becoming an anti-cult crusader. “Missionaries associated with a “Hebrew-Christian” group called the “Jewish Voice” once infiltrated the Jewish nursing home where my grandmother was a resident. As a direct result, I became an activist and helped to stop this unwanted intrusion.”

This reveals that at the heart of Ross’ “cult-busting” crusade is the expression of religious paranoia that Jews are being forcibly indoctrinated into Christianity against their will. Ross further claims that, “…there are many Jews swimming in troubled waters. Some may become captured within the drift nets of fundamentalist and evangelical missionaries. Predatory sharks proselytizing as “messianic Jews or “Hebrew-Christians” may stalk others. How many Jews with the potential to make a meaningful contribution to Jewry have been, or will be, lost because no “rescuers” were there for them?” [3]

Thus the impetus of Ross’ crusade against cults, besides  the economic point, is his religious hatred and intolerance of bible-based Christianity, which he blames for destabilizing Judaism through deceptive missionary means. Yet we wonder how many of Ross’ faithful followers know of his anti-Christian program?

 “Everything we need to know and believe in is already here on earth: from homosexuality to Judaism, as I practice it, the truth is already here. Nobody is going to add one jot or tittle to it… and those who try – are trying to brainwash innocent people and create cults and that’s a fact…”– Rick Ross (Is Rick Ross confessing himself to be a Homosexual?)

Sources used:

Rick Ross (Warning: Some websites exposing Reprobate Rick Ross are sadly Satanic Scientologists cultists, just realize sometimes Satan's children fight each other)

Rick Ross: Religious Expert? False Expert? Psychopath? — Science of the Spirit — Sott.net

Waco Siege – Process: 2018

How ADL Wants to Outlaw Christians

Mary Phagan Was Raped and Murdered by Leo Frank of B’nai B’rith on April 26, 1913 Renegade tribune article link

Leo Max Frank – born April 17, 1884, was a violent Jewish serial child molester, pedophile-rapist, adulterous whoremonger and vicious strangler known for the 1913 ritual murder of 13 year-old Mary Phagan.

Born to a jewish-American family in Texas, Frank was raised in New York and earned a degree in mechanical engineering from Cornell University before moving to Atlanta in 1908. Marrying in 1910, he involved himself with the city’s jewish community and was elected president of the Atlanta chapter of the B’nai B’rith, a jewish fraternal organization, in 1912. Modern B’nai B’rith members have exhibited an ongoing, current and  troubling history of pedophilia, including harboring child pornography, and Leo Frank would be part of that child-sex legacy, revealing the historical pedophile tendencies of the B’nai B’rith past.

Frank worked as a high profile General Superintendent at The jewish-owned National Pencil Company in the heart of Atlanta, Georgia. He was hired on by his uncle Moses Frank, an investor and stock owner in the company. More than 19 factory employees in 1913 would disclose that Leo Frank was an aggressive sexual predator and child molester, one who often made inappropriate sexual innuendos and propositioned numerous pre-teen and teenage child laborers for sexual favors.

Rabbi Donaldstein Trumpberg is NOT your friend!

With Trump's second term, the mask has completely dropped. The US government is now using its police forces and intelligence services to crack down on free speech to protect Elon Musk and Israel.

Christians will be targets of the Noahide Laws!

Are the Noahide Laws found in the Bible? No, not as a definitive list, and they are certainly not associated with either Noah or Adam.... The Talmud calls for capital punishment for Gentiles who violate the Noahide Laws, and this has led to some debate as to whether or not Christians (who worship Jesus Christ) are guilty of violating the first Noahide law and therefore deserving of the death penalty. 

October 16, 1946 - The Martyrdom of Julius Streicher

• Streicher died on the gallows at Nuremberg solely for publishing a paper critical of the Jews.
• Streicher was not part of the German government during the war.
• Streicher had no role in the German war effort or in the concentration camps.

Julius Streicher -- martyred Crusader For Truth: Julius Streicher is the most famous writer and authority on the Jewish problem in all of history. He has been greatly maligned by the forces of organized Jewry. Of the eleven German martyrs who went to their deaths on the gallows at Nuremberg on October 16, 1946, Streicher alone died solely for his speeches and writings. 

Streicher had absolutely nothing to do with the German planning or conduct of World War II. In fact, during the war, he was not even in the government. He was lynched at Nuremberg for absolutely no other reason than because he was highly effective in exposing the many hidden facts about Jews. His world-famous weekly newspaper, Der Sturmer, frankly discussed the Jewish Problem, including their founding of Communism, conspiring against Christianity, and using their great financial resources to subvert governments and the formation of monopolies to wipe out Christian owned small businesses. Streicher especially exposed the Jewish proclivity for unfairly gaining financial advantages over Gentiles. 

A Lifelong Battle for Truth: Julius Streicher was born on February 12, 1885, near the Bavarian town of Augsburg. He was the ninth child of the village schoolmaster. He worshiped his mother, who he later called, "the fortress of my childhood."  

His first remembrance of Jews began at age five, when his mother cried after she had ordered fabric from a Jewish shop which turned out to be of inferior quality. She told him, "This is just like a Jew." Streicher, whose family was devoutly Catholic, would later say that the village priest once told the congregation that the Jews had fought Christ bitterly, finally crucifying him. Streicher added: "that was my first inkling that the nature of the Jews was peculiar." 

At the age of 13, he entered a training institute to become a teacher. After a five- year course, Streicher began a teaching career in January 1904. By 1912, he joined the Democratic Party and addressed their meetings in Nuremberg. He was a gifted orator and quickly became very popular, receiving war applause wherever he spoke. 

However, there was one group which did not approve of his nationalist views. A bank employee warned Streicher to avoid offending the Jews, with these words:  

"Streicher, let me give you some advice. I work in a Jewish bank. I have learned to be silent at times when my German heart gladly would have spoken. The Jews are few in number but great in the economic and political power they have achieved, and their power is dangerous. You, my dear Streicher, are still young and cocky, and don't mince words. But never forget what I am telling you: the Jews have great power, and that power is dangerous, very dangerous." World War One Hero: In 1913, Streicher married Kunigunde Roth. Lothar, their first son, was born in 1915. He would later write for Der Sturmer. A second son, Elmar followed in 1918. 

World War One broke out in 1914 and Streicher enlisted in the infantry. He saw heavy front-line fighting in France. Streicher sought out dangerous missions and carried a crucial message though heavy enemy fire which prevented an encirclement. For this, he became the first man in his company to win the Iron Cross. He then was selected as a member of the elite Mountain Machine Gun Detachment and was later accepted as an officer candidate. This was unusual because at the time, only men from aristocratic families were allowed to become officers. As a First Lieutenant, he fought bravely on the Romanian and Italian fronts. 

At the time of the Armistice in November 1918, Streicher was back serving again on the French front, winning the coveted Iron Cross First Class. This is described as a medal of merit for "genuine distinction to an excellent combat leader who demonstrates courage and consistency under fire."  

Streicher Discovers the Cause of Germany's Humiliation: Allied soldiers occupied Nuremberg in 1918 and continued the "starvation blockade" of Germany to compel acceptance of the Versailles Treaty. This "Treaty of Shame" decreed that the German Army be composed of no more than 100,000 men, that her fleet be scuttled, billions paid in war reparations and most humiliatingly (and falsely), agree that Germany was the sole cause of the War. 

The catastrophic inflation of the Weimar Republic began at this time. The savings of every German were wiped out. Jews were then able to buy up newspapers, industries, thousands of city blocks of apartments and thousands of small businesses for a fraction of their value. Civil war raged in the streets of German cities, incited by the same Jewish Bolsheviks whose coreligionists were pillaging Russia. 

Streicher was fortunate to have his old teaching position, as millions were thrown into unemployment. 

At this time, Streicher was given his first copy of The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion. The Protocols were brought to Germany from Russia, then in revolutionary turmoil, by a young college student, Alred Rosenberg. He was destined to join Streicher on the martyr's scaffold at Nuremberg. 

The Protocols were (are) the secret minutes of the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland in 1897. This congress was presided over by Jewish leader Theodore Herzl, credited with founding the Zionist movement. The Protocols detail a plan for Jewish domination over Gentiles by controlling money and using it to subvert Christian governments. Corrupt, Clinton-like politicians are hired to rule over Gentiles by the Jews. The ultimate goal of such scheming is the establishment of a Jewish-controlled Marxist state. Some say that the Protocols are the blueprint for today's New World Order.  

"JULIUS STREICHER SPEAKS" A typical poster advertising a Streicher meeting

Streicher began speaking on these new revelations about Jewish political activity. He addressed many thousands of people at hundreds of rallies stressing the fact that the Jews are a separate race who are not Germans at all but constitute an alien and dangerous "State within the State." 

Crusading Newspaper Launched: Deutscher Volkswille was a newspaper launched by Streicher in 1921. It became the voice of the German Working Community organization, of which Streicher was a principal leader. In an article criticizing some of the wealthiest Jewish businessmen in Germany, Streicher wrote: 

"Do you really think the Rothschilds, Mendelsohns, Bleichroders, Warburgs, and Cohns worry about your poverty? As long as these blood brothers are our leaders, and as long as your party officials are Jewish lackeys, you will be no threat to the big money men. As long as you yourself do not lead the way, and as long as the black shadow of foreign blood is behind you, you will be betrayed and deceived. The black shadow cares for itself, not for you." Streicher often quoted what Jewish leaders themselves had written as proof of a Jewish conspiracy to dominate Gentiles. England's only Jewish Prime Minister was Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881), who in his book, Lord George Bentick, wrote on page 357: "An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property...by the secret societies which form Provisional Governments, and men of the Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them. The people of God (Jews) cooperate with atheists; most skillful accumulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the peculiar and chosen race touch the hand of all the scum and low casts of Europe; and all this because they wish to destroy that ungrateful Christendom." The Nuremberg Trials Jewish Vengeance on Patriots Who Fought to Free Europe from Their Domination Fought Against Mongrelization of White Race: In 1923, Streicher condemned interracial breeding in an article he wrote blasting the vindictive French practice of stationing Negro occupation troops in the Rhineland: "When a Negro soldier on the Rhine misuses a German girl, she is lost to the race." Further, he condemned interracial breeding because "a racially pure people, conscious of its blood, can never be enslaved by the Jews. It (Jewry) will only be the master of the mixed races." Streicher said that people were very careful about the breeding of their thoroughbred horses, cattle and dogs and should likewise ensure that their offspring mate with superior stock. He held that there is a Jewish conspiracy to poison the blood of the superior races with inferior stock. This is also why the Jews favor abortion because it reduces the White population. (Bear in mind that he said this in the 1930s). 

Revolt Fails - But Streicher Elected to Parliament: With Streicher having some 2,000 members in Nuremberg, Hitler sought a merger with him to expand his base in Munich. Streicher held at least one mass meeting per week, while publishing a newspaper and still teaching school. 

Streicher was a key player in Hitler's abortive attempt to seize power from the corrupt Bavarian government during the Munich Putsch of November 9, 1923. Streicher was made "Director of Propaganda" and drove around Munich, speaking to street corner crowds, announcing the revolution. Streicher marched with Hitler, Himmler and General Erich Ludendorff through Munich to the Feldherrnhalle monument, when police opened fire. Sixteen marchers were killed, dozens, including Hermann Goering, were seriously wounded and the rest scattered. The "Beer Hall Putsch" had been quashed. 

After a sensational trial, where even the judges praised the defendants for their patriotism, Hitler was imprisoned at Landsberg for 14 months. Streicher was luckier, receiving one month in jail. Streicher lost his teaching job but due to his good record, was granted a pension at the age of 39. 

Streicher then joined the Deutscher Arbeiter Pareti (DAP) and was promptly elected to parliament on April 6, 1924. While average DAP speakers drew crowds of a few hundred, Streicher averaged 2,000 - all of whom paid for the privilege of hearing him. In the fall of 1924, he ran for the Nuremberg City Council and won. He held two elected positions simultaneously. 

Streicher Launches der Sturmer: On April 14, 1923, Streicher launched his most famous effort, the weekly newspaper, Der Sturmer (The Storm). The sub-head of the paper read: "A German Weekly in The Struggle for Truth."  

Streicher began an incessant, running battle with the Establishment, extending through the Third Reich era. Editions of his paper were banned or seized thirty times between 1923 and 1933 and in one eleven-day period, he was hit with five lawsuits. He served a total of eight months in prison for defying court orders to cease distribution of banned issues of Der Sturmer. 

In 1927 circulation was only 14,00 copies. By 1933 it rose to 25,000 in 1934, 113,800 and jumped to two million by 1940. By then, some 300 people worked for Der Sturmer including one Jew named Jonas Wolk. The Goring report noted that Wolk was paid a "good salary" and wrote some of the paper's most anti-Jewish articles. It was now a publication of international prominence and one most feared by the Jews. By 1941 Der Sturmer had opened branch offices in Vienna, Prague and Strasbourg and in Denmark an edition was launched. 

When free, Streicher managed to give an average of one speech per week. He was named a National Speaker for the NSDAP and was one of their most requested orators. His meetings were spectacular affairs which included bands, marching men, colorful decorations and when he strode to the podium, a standing ovation erupted much like a modern rock concert. Streicher's oratory was lively, entertaining and forceful. 

Streicher would give an annual Christmas party for the various miscreants imprisoned at Dachau. At one dinner, he offered freedom and a one-way railway ticket to Russia to any Communist detainee wanting to move to the "worker's paradise." None volunteered. 

In 1923, Streicher was elected to the Reichstag but his days of influence in the NSDAP were over. 

The Teachings of Julius Streicher 

1. 1. Jews concentrate in certain occupations such as doctors, lawyers, money-lenders, merchants, entertainers, etc. Thus, they gain a disproportionate share of the wealth. They control the large monopoly department stores thus putting the independent Gentiles out of business.
   2. Jews pay low wages often forcing poor workers into crime and some women into part-time prostitution.
   3. Jews are not true creators of wealth. They avoid physical labor and are rarely farmers, masons, factory workers, etc. Their religion teaches that it is shameful.
   4. Jews hate Jesus Christ but have turned His birthday int a source of great profits. As Rabbi Jacob Wise said: "It is better to have Christmas than smallpox. Besides, if the crucified one had a brother born in the summertime it would have given us two such profitable holidays."
   5. Jews exploit sex for financial gain through their control of the theater and publications.
   6. Jews are parasites who secretly gain wealth by exploiting the unwary host people.
   7. Jews gain power by first pleading for "tolerance and brotherhood." They coddle political leaders of a nation by making themselves useful - ingratiating themselves until they become the power behind the throne.
   8. Jews give to charities in order to gain respectability.
   9. Even if a Jew undergoes Christian Baptism, he remains a Jew because they are a race.
   10. Jews concentrate themselves in the large cities where they promote socialism and decadence.

Julius Streicher's favorite saying:  

"He who knows the truth and does not speak it is a miserable coward."

Nazi Leaders Persecute Streicher: The National Socialist government's treatment of Streicher is further refutation of the charge that Germany's leaders attempted a "holocaust" of Jews. Goring, Himmler, Hess and others sought to have Der Sturmer banned as being "too anti-Semitic and an embarrassment." 

Despite the efforts of these ingrates, Hitler usually sided with his old party comrade Streicher. He once defended Streicher saying, "If I let Streicher fall and banned the Sturmer, world Jewry would howl with glee. I will not give them the pleasure." Hitler insisted upon receiving a copy of every issue of Der Sturmer as soon as it was printed. 

Streicher's paper was now reaching millions of people weekly. His enemies now included Nuremberg Mayor Willi Liebel and police chief Benno Martin. In 1939, they charged that Streicher had said that Goring was impotent and could not have fathered his daughter. They accused him of illegally taking shares in a business and the wrongful disposition of Jewish property. All chargers were later proven false. Nevertheless, Goring named a top-secret commission to investigate Streicher and decreed him "guilty." They then demanded that Hitler ban Der Sturmer. It should be recalled that Goring was never anti-Jewish and when some wanted half-Jewish, Luftwaffe General Milch removed, Goring declared, "I will decide who is and who is not a Jew." 

It must be noted that your editor sent this newspaper to Mrs. Rudolf Hess in Germany in 1964 and received a reply stating: "Take my name off your list, my husband was never anti-Jewish and did all that he could to close down Der Sturmer."  

Even Himmler wanted Der Sturmer put out of business. With all of these pro- Jewish elements in the German government, any planned holocaust of Jews would have been impossible. In truth, not a single Jew was ever gassed and to this very day no workable "gas chamber" has ever been located in the camps. 

Hitler was forced to act against Streicher. He forbade him from speaking at meetings. Goring pressed for a harsher punishment, stating that to get Hitler to act against Streicher was, "a really tough job." Streicher appeared before the Goring Commission and defended himself, calling his accusers "liars." Martin drew his pistol and threatened to shoot Streicher. Later Goring would comment, "he should have done it." 

Goring, Hess and the others demanded that Hitler take firmer action to silence Streicher. Hitler ordered him to "retire" to his country estate outside Nuremberg. He was virtually under house arrest. He was not allowed to go to his office. Other members of the government were forbidden from even visiting Streicher. However, Hitler felt that the work of Der Sturmer was so important that he ordered that a courier be provided between Streicher's home and office so that he could continue to run the paper, Hitler said:  

"This Streicher affair is a tragedy...Streicher is irreplaceable...There's no question of his coming back but I must do him justice. If one day I write my memoirs, I shall have to recognize that this man fought like a buffalo in our cause...I can't help thinking that, in comparison with so many services, the reasons for Streicher's dismissal are really very slender." Streicher Arrested and Tortured by Jews: Streicher's wife died in 1943. Several weeks before the war's end, he married his life-long secretary Adele. They then fled their home before the advancing U.S. Army. On May 23, 1945, a Jewish U.S. Army Major Plitt recognized Streicher and took him into custody. He was hailed as a hero and flown back to New York City where an official "Major Plaid Day" was declared. Jews celebrated in the streets, cheering the arrest of the man they called, "The World's No. 1 Jew Baiter." 

Streicher passed a note to his lawyer, Dr. Hans Marx, describing how Jews and Negroes had tortured him in his cell. A photograph backed up his charges, showing him standing naked with black and blue marks and a sign around his neck proclaiming, "Julius Streicher, King of the Jews." 

The note read:  

"Two niggers undressed me and tore my shirt in two. I kept only my pants. Being handcuffed, I could not pull them up when they fell down. So now I was naked. Four days! On the fourth day, I was so cold that my body was numb. I couldn't hear anything. Every 2 - 4 hours (even in the night!) Niggers came along under command of a White man and hammered at me. Cigarette burns on the nipples. Fingers gouged into eye-sockets. Eyebrows and chest hair pulled out. Genitals beaten with an ox whip. Testicles very swollen. Spat at. "Mouth open" and was spat into. When I refused to open, my jaws were pried apart with a stick and my mouth spat into. Beaten with a whip - swollen, dark-blue whelps all over the body... Photographed naked! Jeered at wearing an old army greatcoat which they hung round me." When Her Marx protested the mistreatment of Streicher to the court, the inquisitors erupted with outrage. They immediately ordered that the motion be struck from the trial record as "highly improper." Streicher twice brought up his being tortured and rather than ask for an investigation, the judges ordered his statements deleted from the record. They held him in contempt of court for even revealing the matter. 

Witchcraft Trial At Nuremberg: A century from now, historians will probably rate the actions of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg as one of the most shameful moments in American history, worse even than the 12-year Reconstruction reign of terror in the American South after the Civil War. Basically, the defendants were tried for having lost the war, in an example of "victor's justice" at its worst. 

The Jew Samuel Rosenman was a New York legislator who wrote that state's socialistic rent control laws. In 1932, he was appointed to the New York Supreme Court by another Jew, Gov. Herbert Lehman. He became one of Franklin Roosevelt's left-wing "Brain Trusters" and was called "the power behind the throne. After Roosevelt's death, Harry Truman sent him to the U.N. founding conference in San Francisco on May 5, 1945. His mission was to establish the International Military Tribunal (IMT) to try Germany's leaders for "war crimes." Rosenman was an official of the American Jewish Committee. 

Julius Streicher was charged with only two of the four counts that most of his co- defendants faced. Even this grotesque tribunal could not charge him with "conspiring to wage aggressive war" or "war crimes," for he had been out of government in Germany since 1940. The inquisitors settled for charging him with "crimes against humanity," (Count 4), by "inciting racial hatred" through his writings. 

Had Streicher been under the protection of American law, he could not have been prosecuted as his comments could have been defended as freedom of speech. 

Trumped Up "War Crimes" Indictment: Shortly before his death, Roosevelt sent his chief legal advisor, the Jewish Judge Samuel Roseman, to Europe to organize a Soviet style "war crimes" tribunal. Such a move of "victors trying the vanquished" was unprecedented and illegal. Roseman continued his work under Truman. 

This Kangaroo court began its shameful proceedings on November 30, 1945, with an indictment of fall Germany's leaders with "conspiracy to wage aggressive war, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity." 

None of these accusations fit Streicher. He was out of the government, under house arrest and had nothing whatsoever to do with the war. Thus, they concocted the ludicrous charge of "conspiracy to commit genocide" through his anti-Jewish writings. In the eyes of the Jews, the same charge could easily be made against this editor and others in the right-wing patriotic movement. 

Holocaust Denied Before Nuremberg Court: Streicher lawyer Hans Marx told the court that his client had no knowledge of any "holocaust" and indeed, opposed violence against the Jews. Streicher boldly took the stand to deny that any so-called holocaust ever took place. In fact, he was the first to expose this outrageous fraud and repeatedly stated:  

"I did not know (of any developing holocaust) and again I would not have believed it. To this day, I do not believe that five million were killed. I consider it technically impossible that could have happened. I do not believe it. I have not received proof of that up until now." It should be noted that Streicher was considered a respectful and sincere witness. Wartime psychologist Douglas Kelly, who examined Streicher, said that he was convinced that Streicher firmly believed in the truth of his views on the Jews. Soviet Show Trial Begins Soviet-Style Kangaroo Court: Ohio Republican Senator Robert Taft objected to the judicial mockery of the Nuremberg war crimes trial with these prophetic words: "It is a miscarriage of justice the American people will long regret." Senator Taft new that the precedents set at Nuremberg would be used against American servicemen in a future conflict with the Communists. Americans faced "war crimes trials" by communist "people's courts" in both Korea and Vietnam. How many were executed remains a secret from the American people. 

Julius Streicher was charged with Count One of the indictments, "conspiring to wage aggressive war." Since Streicher was under house arrest during the war, this easily disproven charge was dropped. This left him facing Count Four, "crimes against humanity by stirring up hatred against the Jews." 

To this day, Jews in American are trying to create such a crime here through passage of "anti-hate laws." This is a brazen attack upon the constitutionally- guaranteed First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech. Therefore, Streicher could never have been accused of any crime under U.S. law. 

Experts Questioned Validity of Streicher Case: Telford Taylor, a member of the U.S. prosecution staff at the trials, published his the anatomy of The Nuremberg Trials in 1992. In this 700-page book, he writes that many among the prosecution staff questioned the legality of trying Streicher because he was  

"a publisher of a privately owned newspaper not connected with the government. Streicher had nothing to do with military decisions and had been a political nonentity since 1940. He had been an important force in sowing the seeds of anti-Semitism but was that an international crime?" British prosecutor Sir. Hartley Shawcross is quoted by Taylor as stating:  "I and many others thought Streicher's case was the most debatable." Taylor further stated that the Streicher case presented the court with their most serious problem because "there was no accusation that Streicher himself had participated in any violence against Jews." During Streicher's two-day cross- examination, he was questioned only about articles and cartoons from Der Sturmer! 

My Mission in Life: Repeatedly, Streicher stated that "My life's mission is to unmask the Jews." He told the court, 

"The Jews are a race and not a religion. My goal was not to persecute the Jews but to enlighten Gentiles to put them on guard." The May 1934 issue of Der Sturmer was entered into evidence as the "worst act of anti-Semitism" committed by Streicher. This entire issue was a feature of the centuries-old accusation that secret sects of extremist orthodox Jews would crucify a Christian child during Passover, using the blood in a ritual ceremony. This accusation is known among Jews as "Blood Libel." 

Considering the number of weird and murderous cults afflicting the United States since World War II, Streicher's charges have great credibility. 

Not Allowed to Answer Inquisitors: Streicher thoroughly researched this subject, citing many sources with footnotes. His defense attorney asked him to reply to the prosection's charge that he had no documentary proof that such crimes were once practiced by certain Jews. Streicher answered:  

"The sources were given in that issue. There was reference made to a book written in Greek by a former Rabbi who had been converted to Christianity. There was reference to a publication of a high clergyman of Milan. Not even did Jews raise objections to that book. 

Ritual murder is referred to in court files which are located in Rome. There are pictures in it which show that in 23 cases, the Church itself has dealt with the question. The Church (Catholic) has canonized 23 non-Jews killed by ritual murder. 

Pictures of sculptures, that is, of stone monuments were shown as illustrations. Everywhere (in Der Sturmer) the source was pointed out...But in this connection I should like to say, we never wanted to assert that all Jewry was ready now to commit ritual murders. But it is a fact that within Jewry there exists a sect which engaged in these murders. I have asked my council to submit to the Court a file from Pisek in Czechoslovakia, very recent proceedings. A court of appeal has confirmed a case of ritual murder. Thus, in conclusion I must say..."

At this point Streicher's testimony is cut off by Judge Jackson, who stated, "I object to this statement...He ought to be returned to his cell and any further statements that he wishes to make transmitted through his counsel to this court; he should be held in contempt of court." Taylor states:  "Der Sturmer was not a government agency, it was a private newspaper, owned and edited by Julius Streicher. The charges were brought against a private newspaper owner and journalist, punish him for publishing statements which he believed to be true." The publicity-seeking "court" was composed of four "judges" and four alternates. (Two each, from the U.S., England, France and the Soviet Union). Taylor writes that only one was qualified to judge such a case. Two of the eight judges were Jews, Robert Falco of France, and Lt. Col. A.F. Volchkov, (real name Berkman), of the Soviet Union. The General Prosecutor for the "High Court" was the Jew, Dr. Jakob Meistner. 

Defendants Denied Soviet Hoax: Every time the alleged extermination of Jews (they had not "coined" the term "holocaust" yet) was brought up, Streicher stated that he did not believe it. He added that it was technically impossible for such mass killings to have ever occurred, a fact proven decades later by scientists and scholars. Goring also testified that there was never any organized extermination program for the Jews. Today, informed people know that the "holocaust" is a propaganda hoax fabricated by Soviet NKVD head Lavrenti P. Beria through the "Jewish anti-Fascist Committee," headquartered in his office. 

Streicher's Fate A Foregone Conclusion: After eight months, the trial ended on August 31, 1946. During the judges' deliberations, there were long debates on some of defendant's cases but not Streicher's. Despite a memo by legal advisor U.S. Maj. Robert Stewart that the Streicher case should be given "careful consideration," he was found guilty and sentenced to hang without any dissent. 

Telford Taylor admitted: "The tribunal's hasty, callous and unthinking treatment of the Streicher case was not an episode to be proud of." he added that the prosecution neither offered nor submitted any evidence to support their charges against Streicher and "I was left in a quandary about the legal basis of the charges against him." 

Fighter To the End: On September 30, Julius Streicher was informed in court that he had been sentenced to hang. He angrily stomped out of the room. Taylor wrote in his book: "I could hardly blame him for this show of temper, for I thought the Tribunals opinion had been superficial." We would call it cold-blooded ritual murder! 

Despite their client's refusal to appeal their convictions, lawyers for Streicher, Goring and Frank did so anyway. Dr. Marx argued that the evidence "never connected Streicher to aggressive war." Streicher spent his remaining days writing his Last Political Testament on the Jews. We hope to have it translated into English for your study very soon. 

The victims held wrenching last meetings with relatives. They were not informed of the exact date of their hanging. The Jew S.N. Binder was put in charge of the condemned men in the period between sentence and execution. He cruelly banned most privileges. Only one-half hour a day was allowed for "exercise" in which they wee manacled. 

Hermann Goring denied his enemies the pleasure of watching him die by biting into a carefully hidden vial of cyanide on the eve of the hangings. How it was obtained has never been covered. 

Hangings Deliberately Bungled: Sgt. John C. Woods, the U.S. Army's official executioner, was given the "honor" of hanging the eleven martyrs. He had been the Army's chief executioner for 15 years and was reputedly the expert in his grisly profession. 

In the prison's gymnasium, three gallows were erected because the deaths were intended to be slow and torturous, perhaps in keeping with the Talmud-mandated fate of all real and imagined enemies of the Jews. 

Stag Magazine, (Vol. 3, No. 1, December 1946), reported that Woods was a Jew. He used a short rope that prevented instantaneous death from a broken neck, instead insuring a slow death by strangulation. He built the trap door too small so that their facial features would be mutilated during the fall. Woods would later boast to the U.S. Army's Stars and Stripes newspaper that he enjoyed the task, saying that "hanging those Nazis was the best thing I ever did." 

Purim Feast, October 16, 1946: Early that morning, the condemned were told to change into their court suits for execution. Streicher refused and guards forcibly dressed him. On the upper floors, Hess heard the commotion and shouted, "Bravo, Streicher!" 

Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop was brought out first with hands bound behind him to make his drop more cumbersome. At 1:14 a.m., Woods pulled the lever and Ribbentrop dropped and 18 minutes passed before the doctors finally pronounced him dead. 

Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel went to the second gallows as Ribbentrop was still strangling on the first. It took the brave Keitel 24 minutes to die. 

SS General Ernst Kaltenbrunner was directed to the third gallows, as the two previous victims were still strangling. It took 13 minutes for his excruciating death. 

Minister Afred Rosenberg followed, taking 10 minutes to die. Hans Frank was next, dying after 10.5 torturous minutes. Wilhelm Frick strangled at the end of the rope for 12 minutes. 

A Final Warning to the Gentiles: Streicher is said to have entered the room in "blazing defiance." When asked his name, he refused to answer. While climbing the stairs, he was the only martyr to shout "Heil Hitler!" 

Upon reaching the platform, he spat in Woods face and said, "The Bolsheviks will hang you one day." He was the only one not given time for a final statement - they wanted to begin the slow strangulation of Streicher as quickly as possible. He shouted, "Purim festival, 1946!" a reference to the Jewish celebration of their slaughter of 70,000 Gentiles in the Book of Esther. As Woods pulled the hood over his head, Streicher's last earthly words were "I am now by God my father! Adele, my dear wife." Streicher died after a long 14-minute strangulation. 

Fritz Sauchel followed, protesting "I die innocently. The verdict was wrong, God protect Germany and make Germany great again. Let Germany live and God protect my family." it took him 14 minutes to strangle. General Alfred Jodl, whose fate disturbed American Army offices, said simply, "I salute you, my Germany." It took him 16 long minutes to die. 

Arthur von Seyss-Inquart was the last to hang at 2:57 a.m., after two long hours of listening to the horror of the slow deaths which began with the hanging of Ribbentrop. 

No medical certificate of death was ever issued by a doctor, which in a properly- conducted hanging would list the cause of death as a broken neck. 

The vindictiveness of the Allied "victors" was evident even after the men's deaths. Gruesome photos were made and widely published of the eleven dead men. They did not even allow the families to claim the bodies of their loved ones. They were cremated and their ashes emptied in the river Isar. 

Trojan Horse Trump? Sinister Project Esther will empower Trump and Elon to persecute anyone who questions Israel! | Stew Peters Network

LINK TO THE STEW PETERS BROADCAST

Summary

➡ The Stew Peters Network talks about The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank, has released a plan called Project Esther to combat antisemitism with the potential backing of Donald Trump if he returns to the White House. The plan, named after a Jewish historical figure who saved Jews from genocide in Iran, suggests that criticism of Jews or Israel could be silenced. The plan’s authors include the America First Policy Institute, often referred to as a ‘White House in waiting’, suggesting that the plan could become federal policy if Trump wins the next election. The plan has sparked controversy and fears of increased control and potential conflict with Iran.

➡ The text discusses concerns about media influence, political power, and potential misuse of military force within the United States. It suggests that Israel has significant influence over U.S. politics and media, and expresses worry about potential future conflicts. The text also criticizes both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, suggesting they are controlled by external forces. Lastly, it warns about the potential for the U.S. military to be used against American citizens under certain laws.

➡ The text discusses the influence of certain groups and individuals on American politics, suggesting they have a significant impact behind the scenes. It implies that these entities, including AIPAC and the ADL, have a covert authority that isn’t obvious to the average American. The text also criticizes the perception of Israel in American politics and media, and questions why the masses don’t see or understand this influence. It ends with a call for more people to become aware of these issues.

➡ This text discusses the importance of understanding the Holocaust and its impact on history. It introduces the Holocaust Encyclopedia, a comprehensive resource that critically analyzes the Holocaust narrative. The text also highlights the need for financial support to keep their network running, offering benefits to those who contribute. Lastly, it promotes Curable, a company offering CBD products, as their spotlight sponsor for the month.

Excerpts from "The ADL is leading the attack against free speech on Palestine" link here

"Despite being widely understood as a mainstream civil rights organization, the ADL has a long history of surveilling and infiltrating social justice and human rights organizations, silencing advocacy for Palestine, and particularly working to silence any and all criticism of Israel."

"These talking points have culminated in calls from the ADL for law enforcement to surveil, investigate, and possibly prosecute student activists. In a public letter released on October 25, the ADL and Brandeis call on university administrators to investigate and potentially criminalize Students for Justice in Palestine on baseless charges of “material support” for terrorism, a call echoed and aggrandized by ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt in his November 15 call for the FBI and the IRS to investigate these student groups.

In addition, the ADL recently described Jewish Voice for Peace – a group long devoted to dismantling antisemitism – as a “hate group.” The impetus for the claim was the October 27 sit-in in Grand Central Station, which called for a ceasefire in Gaza. Repeating the mantra that anti-Zionist groups are the “photo inverse of white supremacists,” the ADLs weaponization of antisemitism effectively censors critics of Israel. "

The late Milton William Cooper's 3 part series exposing the ADL

Politically Correct Evolves to New Definition

Under the current administration, the definition of antisemitism is being expanded and politically redefined. This new interpretation threatens to label anyone or any organization that defends human rights and justice as antisemitic. Is this a strategy to silence opposition and suppress free speech? This video reveals the implications of this evolving definition and its impact on global discourse.

The Deep State’s War on Truth—Waged with Doublespeak, Delusion and Propaganda

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” — George Orwell

The Deep State’s war on truth is being waged with doubletalk, delusion and propaganda.

Through deliberate manipulation of language—what George Orwell called “doublespeak”—Donald Trump has provided cover for the Deep State’s continued grip on power.

While promising to drain the swamp, his administration has instead relied on contradictory policies, misinformation, and propaganda to further entrench the very system he claims to oppose. Although the Trump administration is merely the latest frontman for the Deep State’s efforts to maintain its stranglehold on power, we are approaching a tipping point beyond which there may be no turning back to freedom as we have known it.

This is how “we the people” remain on the losing end of this devil’s bargain that is life in the American police state.

What we desperately need is a reality check, and that starts by disconnecting from the Deep State’s propaganda-riddled, manipulated alternative reality about the state of our nation.

While President Trump, well versed in the “art of the deal,” appears to be saying all the right things about peace, corruption, graft, wasteful spending, free speech, equality, bloated bureaucracy, national security, etc., his administration’s actions tell a far different story about his priorities and his loyalties, which remain self-serving, imperial, flagrantly unconstitutional and intended to keep the Deep State in power.

As always, actions speak louder than words.

When the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are still missing from the White House’s website, that oversight—or deliberate omission—speaks volumes.

Any government that can’t be bothered to include the Constitution among its priorities, or include it anywhere on its administration’s website, is not a government that can be trusted to abide by the Constitution.

Then again, trust has little to do with it.

The Constitution is a contract between the people and the government. What we have been experiencing over the course of both Republican and Democratic presidencies, is a breach of contract. Where the Trump administration differs from those that have come before it is in its willingness to go rogue in defiance of Congress, the courts and the rule of law.

You don’t wage a “common sense” revolution by discarding the Constitution. That way lies dictatorship.

Remember, how you do something is just as important as why you do it.

So, what’s really going on?

As a populace, we have become so desensitized to political lies, especially Trump’s barrage of lies, that we shrug them off and move on. But in doing so, we act as enablers for what hides beneath those lies.

Make no mistake: the Deep State—the real Deep State, not the decoy version of it that Trump trots out to justify dismantling our constitutional republic—hides behind that rhetoric.

As journalist Shawn McCreesh explains, “In order to remake the government, President Trump and his administration are remaking the language used to describe the government. An entire lexicon of progressive terminology nurtured by the last administration has been squelched. In its place is a new vocabulary, honed by the president and echoed by his many imitators in the capital. It is a vocabulary containing many curious uses of doublespeak.”

Doublespeak, as media scholar Edward S. Herman defines it, is characterized by “the ability to lie, whether knowingly or unconsciously, and to get away with it; and the ability to use lies and choose and shape facts selectively, blocking out those that don’t fit an agenda or program.”

The term is derived from George Orwell’s 1984, in which “doublethink” and “Newspeak” are used to manipulate the masses into going along with the government’s agenda.

In true Orwellian fashion, Trump has mastered the art of doublespeak.

For example, McCreesh points to “one presidential order titled ‘Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government’ [that] calls for weaponizing the federal government against itself. Another titled ‘Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling’ demands that ‘patriotic education’ be taught to children… Even as the president signed an executive order titled ‘Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship,’ he signed other orders policing language.”

Consider some of Trump’s other uses of alternative facts, misdirection and misnomers to advance the Deep State’s agenda.

In true doublespeak fashion, Trump’s path to peace leads to more war. At the same time that he’s threatening to halt military aid to Ukraine in the name of securing peace with Russia, Trump’s administration is sending $4 billion in weapons and ammunition to Israel so it can continue to wage war on Gaza.

Trump’s path to nationalism by way of isolationism is in fact empire building. At the same time that Trump is declaring himself a nationalist, breaking ranks with America’s allies, withdrawing from international accords, and ceding ground to authoritarian regimes such as Russia, he is also declaring his intent to lay claim to foreign lands such as Gaza, Greenland and Canada as part of a global power grab.

Trump’s path to saving money is spending money. At the same time that Trump claims to be shining a spotlight on wasteful spending in the hopes of balancing the budget, he is also as guilty of spending—and wasting—taxpayer dollars at an alarming rate. At the same that he’s empowering Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency to drastically reduce the federal workforce in a bid to save money, he is pushing tax cuts that would add $5-10 trillion to the 10-year deficit. As Reuters reports, DOGE’s savings claims are thus far “unverifiable and its calculations have been riddled with errors and corrections.”

Trump’s path to law and order is allowing the police to act lawlessly. At the same time that the Trump administration is advocating for impose harsher penalties and increased prison sentences, even for nonviolent crimes, Trump is dismantling government policies aimed at holding police accountable for official misconduct.

Trump’s path to efficiency is giving rise to even greater inefficiency. Likening DOGE to a chainsaw hacking away at a bloated bureaucracy, Musk has been wiping out whole segments of the federal workforce, agency by agency, with little thought to what programs might suffer as a result or how to keep the government functioning. As CNN reports, “There have been a lot of reports of federal workers being fired then quickly rehired once agencies realized people with critical skills had been let go…for example: Those managing the US nuclear arsenal, and those working at USDA on the response to the bird flu outbreak.”

Trump’s path to economic triumph is spelling economic disaster. Trump continues to forge ahead with his imposition of tariffs on America’s major trading partners despite warnings from economists and the business sector alike that tariffs will hurt, rather than help, the economy and could lead to a recession and a spike in inflation.

Trump’s path to draining the swamp is letting the swamp run the show. Building on the same patterns he exhibited during his first term, when Trump populated his administration with individuals engaged in a pattern of wasteful and extravagant spending on themselves at the taxpayers’ expense, Trump is once again prioritizing personal profit over the American people.

Trump’s path to free speech is censorship. At the same time that Trump claims to be liberating conservative speech from the muzzling power of political correctness, he is embarking on a massive crackdown on lawful First Amendment activities that would criminalize protest activities and punish individuals and groups advocating for policies that contradict White House executive orders.

Trump’s path to transparency is replacing watchdogs with yes-men and loyalists. At the same time that Trump claims to be bringing transparency back to government, his administration is methodically dismantling all of the systemic checks intended to protect whistleblowers and serve as bulwarks against government corruption.

Trump’s path to ending cancel culture is more cancel culture. At the same time that Trump has declared war against left-leaning, politically correct “wokeness,” he is replacing it with a right-leaning cancel culture that aims to do exactly what the left was accused of doing: renaming public spaces, erasing offensive parts of history, and silencing the opposition.  

When you set aside the mountain of contradictory policies and propaganda that have become hallmarks of Trump’s time in office, a grim picture emerges: Trump’s efforts to make America great again are really just a variation on one theme, which is keeping the Deep State in power at the expense of our freedoms.

Indeed, George Orwell’s fictional 1984 could increasingly be mistaken for the Trump Administration’s instruction manual on how to remake the government in the dystopian image of Oceania, the authoritarian regime run by Big Brother.

While America’s founders envisioned a separation of powers held in check by three coequal branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) as the means of thwarting abuse by any one branch, Orwell’s Oceania has four branches of government (the Ministry of Truth, the Ministry of Peace, the Ministry of Love, and the Ministry of Plenty) that work together to maintain Big Brother’s chokehold on power.

As Orwell explains, “The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.”

According to Orwell, “Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”

Thus, the Ministry of Peace is tasked with waging perpetual war in order to keep the government in power. The Ministry of Love is tasked with meting out torture and punishment in order to brainwash the populace into loving Big Brother. The Ministry of Plenty is tasked with maintaining a state of perpetual poverty, scarcity and financial shortages, the rationale being that an impoverished populace is easier to control. And the Ministry of Truth is tasked with disseminating propaganda and rewriting history and language in order to keep the citizens compliant.

The key to this last undertaking, maintaining a chokehold on power, is what Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels referred to as the “big lie.”

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it,” stated Goebbels. “The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Hannah Arendt, writing in The Origins of Totalitarianism, came to the same conclusion:

“In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true… The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.”

This is how that slippery slope to authoritarianism begins, with lies that masquerade as truths and a populace disinclined to think for themselves.

Which brings us back to the tactics being deployed by the Trump administration.

Conformity, compliance and group think are necessary ingredients for tyrants to succeed.

Yet as historian Anne Applebaum writes in The Atlantic, “We are not a theocracy or a monarchy that accepts the word of the leader or the priesthood as law. We are a democracy that debates facts, seeks to understand problems, and then legislates solutions, all in accordance with a set of rules.”

The answer, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, is that we must re-learn what it means to think for ourselves.

Pay attention. Question everything. Dare to be different. Don’t follow the mob. Don’t let yourself become numb to the world around you. Be compassionate. Be humane. Most of all, don’t allow yourselves to become so desensitized to Trump’s brand of politics that you tolerate behavior in government officials that you would never tolerate from your own children (lying, bullying, name-calling, greed, etc.).

When all is said and done, Trump’s path to putting America First is really about putting Trump first and leaving Americans in bondage to the Deep State.

In Orwell’s world, the state maintained power through deception.

In Trump’s America, doublespeak remains the Deep State’s most powerful weapon—one that thrives as long as the public fails to recognize it for what it is—and Trump is proving to be its most effective mouthpiece.

WC: 2180

Take from the following article:

The Rutherford Institute :: The Deep State’s War on Truth | By John & Nisha Whitehead |

SATANIC JEWS WANT TO BAN PROCLAIMING CHRIST AS KING!

JESUS CHRIST IS THE CIVIL KING OF ALL NATIONS!

HAIL CHRIST! HAIL VICTORY!

CHRIST IS KING!

CHRIST IS THE ISSUE!

by Gerald L. K. Smith

The same satanic forces which brought about the sentencing of our Lord to Calvary's cross are active in the world today. These forces are determined that our Lord shall be crucified anew and that the civilization and cultural environment which have grown out of His life and His teachings shall be mutilated, subdued and destroyed.

The enemies of Christ operate on every front. Their chief underwriter is the organized Jew who is determined that Christ as the Son of God shall not be the determining factor in the destiny of our society whether it involves the individual, or the world, or the factors which lie between individual influence and world-wide influence.

THE ATTACK ON THE INDIVIDUAL.

An increasing number of children are being brought into an environment which not only belittles the deity and saving power of Jesus Christ, but ridicules the idea as a fundamental factor in life. The enemies of Christ have infiltrated the Church itself and literally thousands of so-called preachers of the Gospel are representing our Lord merely as a gentle prophet, minus the uniqueness of Divinity. Some of these latter day betrayers of Christian faith would represent the Divine Saviour as an erstwhile Gandhi. Once the individual relationship between a man and his Saviour is lost or forfeited, he becomes easy prey for regimentation and negative influence.

THE ATTACK ON THE HOME.

America was built by families who respected the divine presence of Jesus Christ in the home. They looked upon Him as the final authority involving morals, social conduct and daily behavior. In a high percentage of the homes which constituted the early fabric of American life the family altar was a fixture. In these homes the Bible was accepted as the inspired word of God and Jesus Christ as His only Begotten Son. The father and the mother were able to determine the environment of their children by the power of consent and veto. Today this authority has been defied and a Jew-controlled secularism invades the home every day and every night via radio and television. Influences and portrayals which would have been outlawed a generation ago now become the daily diet of the American family. Bawdy house entertainment which characterized only houses of prostitution in other generations is now brought into the American home even on Sunday night.

THE ATTACK ON THE COMMUNITY.

During the formative period of our national life, Christ was glorified in every community enterprise. Today the mention of the name of Christ in a school room is considered a violation of law offensive to the atheists and the Jews. The Jewish Anti-Defamation League has a nationwide campaign to forbid even the saying of grace over school lunches on the grounds that to honor the name of Christ is to offend the Jews.

THE ATTACK ON THE STATE.

Under Jewish pressure certain states have outlawed the Nativity Scene glorifying the birth of Christ. This forbids the erection of the nativity scene in front of city halls, schoolhouses, court houses and public squares.

A Nation which has been blessed because of its high tribute to the Name of Jesus Christ is being asked to make of this Holy Name forbidden fruit. Public officials are being coerced, school teachers have been intimidated, "Jingle Bells" is being substituted for "Silent Night, Holy Night." Communities which forbid the mention of the Name of Christ in prayer or song now advocate that the students be enlightened on Communism. Cynical professors and atheistic instructors do not hesitate to tear down Christian faith in school rooms where the teaching of Christian faith is forbidden.

THE ATTACK ON THE NATION.

Shrewd politicians have been made to realize that the name of Christ must never be introduced in speeches or campaign talks having to do with the Nation's welfare. Subtle forces have arranged for a Jew of wealth and substance to give financial support to every prospective winning candidate, regardless of his party, so that this supporter can serve as a veto instrument against the risk of the candidate embracing CHRISTIAN statesmanship. Mature observers believe that one reason for the purging of the fearless General Edwin Walker was the fact that he is a militant Christian. (See the Walker statement elsewhere in this magazine.) In his great address shortly after returning from Europe, this dynamic hero and courageous patriot closed his address with the words, "I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ for it is the power of God ..." I am one who believes that the Jew-manipulated smear sheet which launched the campaign to purge Walker was offended because of General Walker's militant Christianity.

THE ATTACK ON THE WORLD.

The conspirators against Christian tradition and national sovereignty were behind the formation of the United Nations and its propaganda arm UNESCO. Imagine the United States being part of a potential World Government machine whose first Secretary General, Alger Hiss, was a traitor and in which any mention of the name of Christ is forbidden and in which a Christian prayer is outlawed. It is my earnest conviction that if we submit permanently to this Christless, anti-Christ, atheistic, traitor-produced monstrosity - if we submit to this Babylonian tyranny, God will curse us for our disobedience and our official blasphemy.

Alleged patriots who become pretenders in their so-called patriotic campaigns on the deliberate basis that Jesus Christ is not the issue are merely Pied Pipers and blind leaders of the blind. It is fairly safe to fight Communism or any form of subversion if Christ is not made the issue; but if one dares to make Christ the issue, he will be immediately honored by smear, abuse and misrepresentation. The Jew-controlled press and information media will dub the militant Christian patriot as a bigot, hatemonger and a lunatic. The sputum of scorn, misrepresentation and abuse should not surprise the Christian crusader. The same treatment was meted out to our Lord, Whose name we defend.

The twins of the anti-Christ are determined that the name of Christ shall be blotted out as a divine figure in our political and social life. These twins are Zionism and Communism. Their activities alternate between collusion and parallel movement, but the net result is to crucify our Lord anew.

CHRIST IS THE ISSUE!

Christ Is the Issue - The Cross and Flag

Defeated In Congress, ADL Attacks Religious Right

JEWS HYPOCRITICALLY USE FREE SPEECH TO PROMOTE PORN AND FILTH TO CORRUPT THE MINDS OF WHITE CHRISTIAN YOUTH!

Oppression by Orgasm?

Oppression by Orgasm?, by Kenneth Vinther - The Unz Review

The Porn Industry as Jewish Anti-Fascist Activism & Cultural Terrorism

Kenneth Vinther • February 26, 2021 

Following a series of instances in which porn websites were discovered to be hosting videos depicting the rapes of underage girls (in some cases the platforms refused to take the videos down), some 2 million have since signed a petition to take down a variety of porn sites and prosecute their executives for human trafficking (this scandal recently culminated in a boycott of Pornhub by Mastercard and Visa). In response to increasing anti-pornography sentiment, gaslighting mainstream media publications and academic journals have launched a campaign to smear the anti-pornography movement for encouraging “antisemitism” and “antisemitic conspiracy theories.”

In an article exposing the “the Far-Right Roots of #NoNutNovember,” Rolling Stone describes a large segment of the anti-pornography movement as “a creepy little smorgasbord of insecurity-driven hate with anti-Semitism, misogyny, and homophobia all rolled up in one,” fuelled by the “conspiracy theory that Jews dominate the porn industry and use pornography as a way to control white men.” The article also claims that “anti-masturbation ideology has historically been used as a tool by fascist figures to gain social control” by manipulating sexually repressed men through social shame. The New York Times has also brought attention to this dangerous “conspiracy theory,” which they believe is contributing to “the recent surge in hate crimes.” Antisemitism watchdogs and Jewish newspapers like the Jerusalem Post went apoplectic when an Al-Jazeera affiliate claimed that Jews created and control the porn industry because they “hate Christ.”

Kristoff Kerl summarizes the issue in the Studies in American Jewish Literature journal. According to Kerl, the ludicrous “fantasy” of a Jewish conspiracy behind pornography, which is irrationally promoted by far-right hate groups, is as follows: Jews use porn to “erode the allegedly ‘natural’ order of white supremacy,” to “subvert. . . Christian sexuality,” to engineer a “porn-caused change in sexual orientation. . . [and cause a] crisis of reproduction for the ‘white race,’” to promote miscegenation and “increase the sexual lusts of men of color or Jewish males for white women,” and finally, as “a technique of psychological warfare” to tranquilize and pacify white men.[1]

Doth the lady protest too much?

The answer is yes, despite the protestations of the above articles to the contrary. All these antisemitic “fantasies” can be proven. Even more, all these claims can be proven, straight from the horse’s mouth, by citing gloating Jewish pornographers. Many of these claims originated with Jews themselves, not anti-Semites. Many Jewish pornographers and scholars openly admit that Jews engage in the production and dissemination of pornography to subvert and destroy gentile culture. First, let us establish the enormous Jewish presence within the porn industry so that any claims to the contrary can be dismissed from the get-go.

Porn as a Jewish Industry

Kerl acknowledges in his article that the most notorious pornographers in American history — Ruben Sturman and Steven Hirsch — are Jewish. Known respectively as the “Walt Disney of Porn” and the “Donald Trump of porno,” the two have both possessed the title of being the top distributor of pornography in America. Sturman built his porn empire while evading the FBI, and after dying as the stereotypical greedy Jewish mobster in federal prison, he passed the family business onto his son, David. Hirsch is still alive. He owns Vivid Entertainment, the largest porn network in the world today.

Seth Warshavsky, a Polish-American Jew known for pioneering internet pornography, is called “the public face of online porn.” David F. Friedman founded the Adult Film Association of America. William Margold was a porn director, activist, and director of the Free Speech Coalition, a trade-association for advocating on behalf of the adult film industry. Paul Fishbein, Irv Slifkin, and Barry Rosenblatt own AVN Media, and Mark Spiegler owns Spiegler Girls (Spiegler also allegedly owns the domain for the pedophile website NAMBLA, according to leaks from the now-defunct Porn Wikileaks). More notable Jewish studio owners and adult industry magnates are Seymore Butts, John Stagliano, Phil Harvey, Joe Francis, Winston Wolf, Gary Cremin, Bruce J. Friedman, Cable Rosenberg, Mike Kulich, and Greg Lansky (Mark Collett has a summary here).

Luke Ford presents another comprehensive list (archive of Ford’s essays can be found here): Ron Braverman, John Bone, Wesley Emerson, Herbert Feinberg, Hank Weinstein, Lenny Friedlander, Bobby Hollander, Rubin Gottesman, Fred Hirsch (Steven Hirsch’s father), Paul Apstein, Steve Orenstein, Jack Richmond, Theodore Rothstein, Ron Sullivan, Jerome Tanner, Armand Weston, and Sam and Mitch Weston. Additionally, Jews were also “most of the leading male performers of the 1970s and ’80s. . . include[ing] Buck Adams, Bobby Astyr, (Bobby Charles) R. Bolla (Robert Kerman), Jerry Butler (Paul Siderman), Seymore Butts (Adam Glasser), Roger Caine (Al Levitsky), David Christopher (Bernie Cohen), Steve Drake, Jesse Eastern, Jamie Gillis (Jamie Gurman), Ron Jeremy (Hyatt), Michael Knight, William Margold, Ashley Moore (Steve Tucker), David Morris, George Payne, Ed Powers (Mark Arnold aka Mark Krinski), Harry Reems (Herbert Streicher), Dave Ruby, Herschel Savage (Harvey Cowen), Carter Stevens (Mal Warub), Marc Stevens, Paul Thomas (Phil Tobias), Marc Wallice (Marc Goldberg), Randy West (Andy Abrams) and Jack Wrangler.”[2]

Corroborating this, the Jewish pornographer Michael Kulich stated in a 2015 interview that “the adult industry was pretty much founded by the Jews,” and that today “all the business owners are pretty much Jewish or have Jewish ties or at some point worked for a Jew.”

What about Playboy? While Hugh Hefner was not Jewish, Nat Lehrman — one of Playboy’s senior editors -– admits that the whole “the whole staff, practically, was Jewish.”[3] Gloria Leonard, who describes herself as “a nice Jewish girl from the Bronx,” invented telephone sex lines and founded the hardcore porn magazine High Society. [4] Another interesting example can be found in the recent Netflix documentary Circus of Books, which celebrates the life of a “nice Jewish couple” that secretly supplied all of the gay pornography in Los Angeles from a secret backroom in their bookstore during the 80s.[5]

The “nice Jewish porn star” Ron Jeremy (who went to a Hebrew school) explained that one reason for the overwhelming Jewish presence in the porn industry is because “Jewish families tend to be more liberal than Christian ones.”[6] If you ask Jewish porn producer Seymore Butts, another large reason is Jewish nepotism (which is also how Jeremy got launched in his career): “if four people compete for a job, and three of them are goyim [gentiles], the Jew, all things being equal, will get the job. That’s the way I work. If I’ve got three actors going for a part, and one of them is Jewish, and they’re all in the same ballpark. . . Sue me.”[7]

The following is an excerpt from an interview with an anonymous pornographer:

D: . . . If you’re welcomed into the porn scene, it’s unbelievable. It’s an extended family.

N: Yeah, it’s a big family.

D: In fact, she almost feels like she’s going to an X-rated country club. So many Jewish people involved with it. She’s just having a ball. [Laugh.] You run into each other on the sets, and you haven’t seen each other in a couple of months, and it’s like old, long-lost relatives and family reunion.[8]

The porn industry is one big Jewish family. Jews feel at home in the adult industry, and hence Jewish publications celebrate the members of their community who have “made it big in porn.” The porn director James Deen, who has done many interviews with the Jewish publication Haaretz and the Jewish Daily Forward, even said that his Jewish identity influences his work:

I never really bought into the faith-God type of situation, but what I did enjoy was the Zionist movement, the culture behind it, the community. . . I identify with Judaism as a culture, and the culture encouraged me to learn, ask questions and strive for knowledge. I know how to shoot and light and edit, because I’m always trying to strive for knowledge at work. I don’t think I would have this type of mentality if I didn’t have my Jewish upbringing.

In the same interview, when asked whether he as any Jewish role models in the industry, he replied:

I don’t go into a place and think I’m Jewish, who else is Jewish, I need to work with them. Respect goes universally across all races, creeds, colors, religions, everything. The Jews know we’re better than everyone else — that’s all that matters. It’s true we’re the chosen people; it’s a fact.[9]

The aforementioned Rolling Stones article tries to wave away the apparent connection between Jews and pornography by pointing out that the CEO of MindGeek, “Feras Antoon, does not appear to be Jewish.” MindGeek is the enormous umbrella multinational that owns the major pornography hosting sites, like Pornhub. It emerged during the early 2000s from Montreal’s “Silicon Valley North,” alongside other tech monopolies like Facebook, Google, and YouTube. While Antoon is not identifiably Jewish, the Rolling Stone article neglects to mention that the COO, David Marmorstein, is. Additionally, the MindGeek monopoly is owed largely to a connection that the previous owner had to the Wall Street firm Colbeck Capital Management — run by former Goldman Sachs executives — which gave the company a $362 million loan in 2011. If Colbeck Management’s senior executives, Jason Colodne and Jason Beckman, are not Jewish, they have serious Jewish connections, as they co-signed Ryan Kavanaugh’s (the President of Warner Bros. Pictures) ketubah, i.e. Jewish marriage document, for one of his marriages.

Jewish pornographers and Jewish organizations were also pivotal in the legalization of pornography in the United States. For instance, the Jewish plaintiff Samuel Roth (who wrote Jews Must Live, which describes the Jewish hatred of gentiles and gentile culture) is credited with stretching the legal definition of what constitutes obscenity in the Roth v. United States (1957) case by arguing that obscene material should be protected under the First Amendment. While the court ruled against Roth, it was provoked to redefine obscenity as “material which deals with sex in a manner appealing to prurient interest.”[10] This definition would later become the basis for the Miller test, which became the Supreme Court’s test for defining obscene material following the case against the Jewish plaintiff Marvin Miller in Miller v. California (1973).

Notable Jewish pornographers, like Al Goldstein, would later beat obscenity prosecutions by exploiting the wording of the Miller test. For instance, Goldstein brags in his autobiography about defeating obscenity prosecutors by “put[ting them] in the position of having to admit to a boner on the stand” to prove whether his material “appealed to prurient interest” or not.[11] Alongside two other high-profile obscenity cases against the pornographer Larry Flynt and the Jewish actor Harry Reems, the precedents obtained by Goldstein effectively precluded the ability to make obscenity convictions and paved the way for the normalization of hardcore pornography. Goldstein later bragged: “What makes Al Goldstein? Al Goldstein’s a fucking legend. How many people legalized pornography? I mean fucking Fishbein is coasting, and Ron Jeremy is coasting. I changed the law.”

Regarding Larry Flynt, while Flynt is not Jewish, he was a notable donor to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). While the ADL is one of the chief organizations spearheading the censorship of hate speech on social media platforms and at the level of the federal government, the ADL also has a history of supporting freedom of expression for pornographers. The ADL does not believe that the First Amendment should protect speech that criticizes Jews, but it does believe that the First Amendment should protect pornographers. The ADL also awarded Hugh Hefner “their American Freedom Award at a fashionable black-tie dinner-dance” in 1980, praising Hefner because “the empire he founded has had a far-reaching impact, not only on the publishing industry, but on the mores of American society as well.”[12] [emphasis added] Additionally, Abe Foxman — former National Director of the ADL — praised Jews in the pornography industry as paradigmatic Americans: “Those Jews who enter the pornography industry have done so as individuals pursuing the American dream.”[13]

Luke Ford says that “Publishers Weekly took me to task for that ‘offensive generalization’ about Jews but it’s true. The big machers [in the pornography] industry are Jewish.”[14] Professor Nathan Abrams laments “that the 350th anniversary of the arrival of the Jews in the United States did not include any celebrations of Jewish innovation in this field. . . why are we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it is about time it was written about seriously.”[15]

Jews comprise roughly 2% of the American population, but they are overwhelmingly overrepresented in the porn industry. The porn industry could be reasonably characterized as a uniquely Jewish industry — ironic, given that pornography was banned in Israel because it causes “great harm to children.” As Benjamin Garland writes, “saying the pornography industry is Jewish is like saying the sky is blue.”

So, the question is not whether the porn industry is Jewish or not. The question is why. And one reason is unquestionably to subvert and destroy white, Western culture and civilization.

As mentioned before, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that Jews see and use pornography as a weapon. One piece of very unambiguous evidence was given by the IDF in 2002. After occupying the West Bank town of Ramallah, the Israeli occupation forces seized the local television stations and began broadcasting hardcore pornography to “psychological[ly] shock” and demoralize the residents. The distribution of hardcore pornography can be shown to achieve a similar end in America and Western Europe as well.

Jewish scholars like Professor Abrams have described the porn industry as an extension of the sexual revolutionary attack on Western culture led by Jewish Marxists like Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse, who inspired many of the Jewish pornographers at the vanguard of pornography legalization during the 70s. One such Jewish pornographer remembers going to porn studios with “my hair down to my ass, a copy of Wilhelm Reich’s Sexual Revolution under my arm, and yelling about work, ‘love and sex.’”[16] Within the literature of these influential Jewish Marxist intellectuals and activists, there is an unmistakable, consistent, and vicious streak of hostility towards religion, conventional sexual morality, and strong gentile families. The Jewish identity of these intellectuals and their anti-family attitudes are not coincidental: these Jewish figures consciously identified as Jewish and saw the annihilation of conservative social institutions to be in the interest of the Jewish community at large, because they believed that doing so would make society resistant to antisemitism. These movements illustrate why Jews see the promotion of sexual decadence as beneficial for the Jewish community, and how the Jewish community sees pornography as a cultural weapon. For our discussion, the notables in this movement reach back at least to the beginning of the 20th century, beginning with the Marxist philosopher György Lukács.

Revolutionary antecedents

Georg Bernard Baron Lukács von Szegedin — shortened György Lukács — was the son of a wealthy Jewish investment banker, a baron by inheritance in the former Austro-Hungarian Empire, and one of the most influential Marxist intellectuals of the early 20th century. In May of 1919, following the Hungarian Bolshevik Revolution and the establishment of Béla Kun’s (also the son of a wealthy Jewish family) Hungarian Soviet Republic, Lukács was appointed as the People’s Commissar for Education and Culture. Lukács had become disillusioned with the Christian working classes, who — as Cécile Tormay records in her famous An Outlaw’s Diary — refused to embrace international communism and remained faithful to God and country. For this reason, Lukács identified Western Christian culture as an obstacle to communist social emancipation and argued that the Marxist “worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the ‘annihilation of the old values’ and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.”[17] As People’s Commissar of Education and Culture, Lukács aimed to “annihilate these old values” through state education, including comprehensive sex-education programs for schoolchildren and the promotion of feminism. A play on the “Red Terror” label used to describe the Bolshevik mass killings of 1918 (the perpetrators of which were also overwhelmingly Jewish), this sex education program came to be known as “cultural terrorism” by his opponents.[18] Under Lukács,

Special lectures were organized in schools and literature printed and distributed to “instruct” children about free love, about the nature of sexual intercourse, about the archaic nature of the bourgeois family codes, about the outdatedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasure. . . This call to rebellion addressed to children was matched by a call to rebellion addressed to Hungarian women. . . [One document published by Lukács’ Commissariat] calls upon women the world over to unite and overthrow the chains imposed upon them by exploitative bourgeois-spirited males.[19]

Lukács’ program was short-lived, as the Hungarian Soviet Republic was defeated and dissolved by Romania in August of 1919, and Lukács was forced to flee to Vienna. However, the idea of sexualizing children to combat reactionary sentiments would recur among prominent Jewish communists, such as Wilhelm Reich.

Born to a Jewish family in the Austro-Hungarian province of Galicia, Reich records his adolescence in his autobiography titled Passion of Youth (1988), where he fondly recalls raping his family’s maids, engaging in bestiality with the farm animals, masturbating to thoughts of his mother, and lusting after his friends’ sister because he was obsessed with “her glorious, long, blond hair.”[20] After studying medicine at the University of Vienna in the early 1920s, Reich pursued his career as a psychoanalyst, and is known for synthesizing the works of Sigmund Freud and Marx. After joining the Communist Party of Germany in 1930, Reich produced two highly influential books: The Sexual Revolution (1936), which provided the name for the sexual liberation movement of the 60s and 70s, and The Mass Psychology of Fascism (1933), which attacked authoritarian Right-wing movements in Europe. In the Soviet Union, the word psikhushka was used to describe the psychiatric hospitals where political dissidents were interned after being diagnosed as mentally ill by the state. In a similar application of politicized psychiatry, Reich claimed to have diagnosed fascist persuasions as a personality disorder caused by the repression of one’s sexuality during childhood. According to Reich,

Suppression of the natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, “good” and “adjusted” in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. At first, the child has to adjust to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family; this makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and sexual anxiety.[21]

Reich’s verdict on curing the fascist personality disorder? “Give the children true sexual knowledge [i.e. encourage adolescent sexual exploration, such as masturbation], [to] free them from sexual confusion. . . Once children and adolescents are reached on a mass basis through their sexual interests, there will be a powerful counterweight against the reactionary forces.”[22]

Reich became a pariah for his endorsement of child abuse. The Danish Communist Party consequently blacklisted him, and after fleeing to America from the NSDAP in Germany, the American government also burned his research and imprisoned him for conduct related to his Orgonomic Infant Research Center, where child sexual abuse was reportedly rampant.[23] Despite the apparent failure of Lukács and Reich, however, their theories about dismantling Christian civilization through sexual liberation found philosophical maturity in the critical theory of the Frankfurt School.

The innocuously named Institute for Social Research was founded and funded by Felix Weil — the son of a wealthy Jewish-Argentinian merchant — in Frankfurt, Germany, 1923. It gathered a coterie of almost exclusively Jewish Marxist intellectuals, such as Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse, to develop Marxism by synthesizing Marxist social liberation with Freudian psychoanalysis, and with the works of luminaries such as Lukács. Two of the principal aims of the Institute were to address the “crisis of Marxism” (referring to the failure of communism to take hold amongst the working classes of Europe), and to confront the problem of rising antisemitism (no doubt a reaction to the cultural terrorism of Jewish Marxists like Lukács and Wilhelm Reich, to the mass persecutions of Christians by the Soviet Cheka, and to the revolutions instigated in Russia, Hungary, and Germany by Jewish revolutionary terrorists like Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht and Kurt Eisner). The school fled Germany in 1933 and eventually found their way to America, where it continued its project with renewed intensity.

Marx famously stated that the point of philosophy is not to interpret, but to change the world. The Frankfurt School was similarly concerned with developing strategies for altering society, “but they were [also] aware of the many obstacles to radical change” — some of these obstacles being Christianity, the traditional family, and conventional sexual morals, as identified earlier by Lukács and Reich.[24] Marx vaguely stated that “an era of social revolution” would commence following the establishment of communism.[25] The Frankfurt School rearranged priorities, arguing instead that social revolution must come first.

In this regard, one of the Frankfurt School’s greatest contributions was the highly influential Authoritarian Personality study. The study, funded by the American Jewish Committee, attempted to identify authoritarianism and anti-Semitism as a personality disorder attributed to the following childhood values: the “conventional idealization of parent(s); submission to parental authority and values; [a] sense of obligation-and-duty to parents; [and the] “ingroup orientation to . . . [the] homogeneous-totalitarian family.”[26]

The study did not apply rigorous and empirical testing procedures to either verify or disprove the hypothesis, because it was intended by its authors to provide an empirical basis for the Frankfurt School’s a priori philosophical and political theory of antisemitism. In the words of Horkheimer, the study was an opportunity for social scientific research “to transform itself directly into propaganda.”[27] Hence, like Reich, the study pathologized healthy and “close family relationships. . . [as] an indication of psychiatric disorder. . . in an attempt to make [Western societies] resistant to Anti-Semitism.”[28]
 While the study was essentially antifascist political activism masquerading as scientific research, it was heavily promoted and became massively influential in American social sciences — “no volume published since the war in the field of social psychology has had a greater impact on the direction of the actual empirical work being carried on in the universities today.”[29]

The most impactful contribution of the Frankfurt School is critical theory, which is a modernized Marxist analytical framework based on the synthesis of Marx and Sigmund Freud that identifies oppression as a social and cultural rather than political-economic phenomena. In the words of Horkheimer, the purpose of critical theory is “the abolition of social injustice. . . [and] the abolition of social relationships which presently hinder development. . . [to help] man to emancipate himself from coercion by nature and from those forms of social life and of the juridical, political, and cultural orders which have become a straitjacket for him.”[30] In other words, critical theory is a revolution against all the major social institutions of white Western civilization — Christianity, the traditional patriarchal family, chastity, and social convention — which critical theory identifies as irredeemable systems of social oppression.

Critical theory laid the foundations for the massively influential New Left movement, which championed civil rights, feminism, abortion rights, and gay rights. Just like Bolshevism, this movement was overwhelmingly Jewish. During the 60s there was “a political mass-migration of Jews from orthodox Marxism into the New Left” who had become disillusioned with communism following Stalin’s anti-Jewish campaign. Additionally, essentially all the New Left’s key figures were Jewish radicals like Alan Ginsberg, Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, and Daniel Cohn-Bendit.

Cohn-Bendit — who was a member of the European Parliament and still chairs parliament groups today — fought fascism in the style of Reich by molesting 5-year-olds in an anarchist “anti-authoritarian kindergarten” in the 60s. He describes these “sexual encounters” in his book The Great Bazaar (1975).[31]

The “father of the New Left” was the Jewish Frankfurt school theorist Herbert Marcuse, who — in the words of Matt Taibbi — “gave us everything from ‘Silence Equals Violence’ to ‘Too Much Democracy’ to the ‘Crisis of Misinformation’ to In Defense of Looting to the 1619 Project and Antiracist Baby.” Further, his work Eros and Civilization complemented the works of Wilhelm Reich in providing a theoretical framework for the sexual revolution. Marcuse also translated critical theory into the New Left’s revolutionary praxis by identifying strategies and key demographics for achieving social and political change. Marcuse argued that Orthodox Marxists had misplaced their faith in the proletariat, though while “the working class is not a revolutionary class. . . where the resistance of the poor has succumbed, students lead the fight against the soldateska and the police. . . [and] black militants pay with their lives.”[32] Marcuse urged the Left to embrace middle-class student radicals and minority coalitions as a new revolutionary vanguard, and to embrace strategies such as the long march through the institutions rather than the violent overthrow of bourgeois society. Marcuse worked to engage and mobilize “the college student as a revolutionary subject” throughout the 60s, and his works were among the central inspirations of the student uprisings of the decade, where student protesters and Jewish anarchists rioted in major cities and threw copies of Wilhelm Reich’s Mass Psychology of Fascism at the police.[33]

Sexual Revolution as a Jewish Defense Against Anti-Semitism

A brief examination of the intellectual origins of the sexual revolution reveals a discernible trend of prominent Jewish radicals exhibiting a relentless and visceral hostility towards the central institutions of white European civilization and culture: religion, sexual responsibility, and cohesive traditional families. This is because they explicitly identify these institutions as seedbeds of antisemitism, i.e., sources of gentile social capital, and therefore as threats to the Jewish community. These two things are not unrelated. As Dr. MacDonald shows, these “Jewish intellectuals and political activists strongly identified as Jews and saw their work as furthering specific Jewish agendas.”[34] This attack on strong, patriarchal gentile family structures and conventional sexual morality, and the replacement of the old Christian values with the egocentric narcissism of the 68ers, was motivated by the desire to break down the social capital and cohesion of America and thereby manufacture a new society that would be heavily insulated against manifestations of anti-Semitism.

One notorious example that is not treated above is Sigmund Freud. Freud laid the intellectual groundwork for the theories of Wilhelm Reich and the Frankfurt School by launching his own assault on conventional Christian sexual attitudes and behaviors. And just like the Frankfurt School, Freud also saw his theories “as a mechanism for ending anti-Semitism.”[35]
 In his own writings, Freud fantasized of himself as “Hannibal, the Semitic leader of Carthage. . . in a war on gentile culture. . . [and against] Rome and its daughter institution, the Catholic Church,” which he identified as irredeemably evil, repressive and antisemitic.[36]

The notable Jewish sexual revolutionaries of the 20th century were motivated by the same goals. Reich called the family “the authoritarian miniature state” because it produces people who are “afraid of authority,” “good,” “adjusted,” and “obedient” — people who are conscious of themselves as committed members of a political body. By attacking high-investment parenting and conventional sexual morality, the mortar that binds every cohesive political community together, Jewish sexual revolutionaries sought to inaugurate a new social order incapable of cohering as an exclusive political body, because such a society would be incapable of discriminating against Jews.

Free love, critical race theory, and gender studies (all derivatives of critical theory) are the dominant ideologies of the West today. And now that these ideologies are firmly in power, you can find plenty of books and articles in which the Jewish community happily takes credit for pushing the cultural envelope, and for its role as a vanguard of the sexual liberation movement. Jews call their mission to fight against all forms of discrimination and prejudice tikkun olam (Hebrew for the Jewish obligation to “heal the world”).

An article from the Times of Israel reads: “How ‘tikkun olam’ inspired world’s first openly gay politician Harvey Milk.”

An article from Tablet Magazine reads: “Broadway’s First Lesbian Kiss Was Originally in Yiddish.”

An article from Haaretz reads: “Brilliant actors like Larry David and Sarah Silverman are challenging America’s powerful religious, family-friendly culture and asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.”

While praising Jews at a Jewish American Heritage Month event, Joe Biden stated: “I bet you 85 percent of those changes [referring to the public acceptance of gay marriage], whether it’s in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.” Professor Abrams agrees: “Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish.”

The works of Freud, Reich, and the Frankfurt School were tremendously influential in the social sciences and the academy, though these are not the only avenues through which Jews “heal the world.”

Jews also “heal the world” by producing and distributing violent and degrading hardcore pornography.

Pornography as a Jewish Weapon to “Subvert Christian Sexuality”

According to Nathan Abrams, a Jewish professor at the University of Aberdeen, many Jewish pornographers identified as sexual revolutionary activists and were inspired by the antifascist praxis of Reich and Marcuse. And while students and Jewish anarchists were throwing Molotov cocktails at the police “to resist the fascism of whiteness” in the 1960s, Jewish activists also sought to liberate women from what Betty Friedan called the “‘comfortable concentration camp’ of the household” by enlisting them as actresses in hardcore porn films.[37] To Abrams, the overwhelming overrepresentation of Jews in the porn industry is clearly “a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channeled into sexual rather than Leftist politics.”[38] To drive this point home, the Jewish porn actress Nina Hartley described “herself as ‘the blonde Jew’ porn star from ‘a long line of radical Jews,’ who ‘wants everyone to have a piece — a piece of sex, a piece of the means of production, a piece of a warm communist community’ and ‘a piece of the promised Messianic Age.’”[39]

Another example is Greg Lansky. A self-obsessed Jewish porn mogul from France who revels in media attention, he illustrates that pornography isn’t just about the money. In an interview with Haaretz, Lansky describes how he “routinely suffered from anti-Semitism” as a child in France, below a photo featuring Lansky as a young boy beside the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. In a pattern remarkably similar to the motivations of other Jewish pornographers, Lansky says he’s “taken on this effort [the adult film industry] because I feel like I belong in this fight for acceptance.”[40]

Abrams elaborates on what this “fight for acceptance” means to Jewish pornographers:

Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their “joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast.” Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having “to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an ‘up yours’ to these people. . .” Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Porn is no longer of the “what the Butler saw” voyeuristic type; instead, it is driven to new extremes of portrayal that stretch the boundaries of the porn aesthetic. As new sexual positions are portrayed, the desire to shock (as well as entertain) seems clear.

In this same vein, the aforementioned Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein stated in an interview with Luke Ford: “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.”[41] “Even when Jews live in a society that welcomes them instead of harassing them, many Jews hate the majority culture.”[42]

In his autobiography, Goldstein shares a fantasy in which he equivocates his porn publishing with heroic antifascist resistance, and refers to himself as “the Hebrew Pit Bull.”[43] Goldstein, who also describes himself as “an insecure, self-loathing Jew,” frequently mentions having suffered antisemitic abuses for his work and wishes that he had been killed by a critic so that he “could have died a martyr like Lenny Bruce.”[44]
 Goldstein also states: “I am probably the epitome of everything the Nazis hated: the Jew pornographer who besmirches the pure morals of the white Aryan world,” and “the ultimate product of Germany’s defeat.”[45]

Pornography is a crucial weapon in the Jewish struggle for “acceptance” against antisemitism and authoritarianism — i.e., healthy families and responsible heteronormative sexual morality. This is why the ADL, which exists to “fight antisemitism” and violate the First Amendment rights of anybody who criticizes the Jewish people, fights for pornographers. As E. Michael Jones describes, porn is one vehicle through which Jews promote a secular humanist vision of society, which they see as important for guaranteeing “individual Jews a civic equality and equality of opportunity dreamed of by previous Jewish generations.”

A society that is tolerant towards every form of sexual deviancy is a society that is tolerant towards Jews.

Do Jews use pornography to “subvert Christian sexuality?”

Verdict: guilty.

To “Cause Changes in Sexual Orientation” and “Create a Crisis of Reproduction for the White Race”

Once pornography is contextualized as a Jewish phenomenon, and particularly as one expression of the Jewish revolution against the traditional family, its role in “creating a crisis of reproduction for the white race” becomes immediately apparent, especially when associated with other Jewish “accomplishments” and agendas.

Birthrates have plummeted in the Western world. Below replacement birth rates have been used by governing parties of America and Western Europe to justify mass replacement migration from the third world (also note that major refugee and immigration organizations are overwhelmingly Jewish). Why have birth rates collapsed?

One reason is the widespread accessibility of contraceptives and abortions. For instance, the abortion rate (ratio of live births to abortions) typically hovers around 20%, meaning 1 in 5 pregnancies in the United States are terminated. As mentioned earlier, Jews were the vanguard of the feminist movement. The Jewish Daily Forward corroborates: “Jewish women were overrepresented in reproductive rights everywhere in the US,” and they were inspired with an urgency to fight for “reproductive autonomy” because of the “immediacy. . . of Nazism.” The notables included Betty Friedan, Susan Brownmiller, Ellen Willis, and Gloria Steinem (notwithstanding crucial icons like RBG). Today, 83% of the Jewish community in America believes that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, whereas in Israel, abortions need to be approved by a “termination committee.” Abortion aside, Jewish figures were also prominent pioneers of contraception, such as the Jewish chemist Carl Djerassi, who is known as “the father of the pill” (oral contraceptives).

The influence of contraception and abortion is likely overemphasized, however, and cultural factors are the most significant contributor to the collapse of reproductivity in the Western world.

Note that Hollywood, like the porn industry, is overwhelmingly Jewish. In the words of Rabbi Dresner, Hollywood is the principal institution laying siege on “the traditional family” in America and throughout the world with its cultural products that promote “‘rebellion, self-fulfillment, and promiscuity’ and a ‘debased view of the human body and spirit.’” Because of Hollywood, “the avant-garde has become the man on the street. Bohemia is Broadway. The filthy jokes formerly restricted to burlesque houses and certain nightclubs’ are now available on ‘films and TV for the millions. Las Vegas is no longer a city but a condition.’”[46] Combine the influence of Hollywood with that of hardcore internet pornography, and it is no wonder that people are less willing to start and raise a family. As discussed earlier, the assault on Christian sexual morality is deliberate. There is even some evidence suggesting that its impact on reproductivity is deliberate as well.

Dr. Andrew Joyce brings attention to the enormous mass-media campaign led by Jewish entertainment and media executives during the middle of the 20th century to “fight fascism” and to “make white Americans find their own ethnocentrism abhorrent.” One key individual in this regard is the Jewish mass-communications researcher Bernard Berelson. In 1969, he corresponded with the Jewish president of Planned Parenthood Frederick S. Jaffe about how to reduce the population of America. Their infamous correspondence is known as the Jaffe Memo. Among the proposals were compulsory abortion and sterilization, a line reading “chronic depression” (assuming to be induced amongst the population?), and the line “encourage increased homosexuality.” Here we have an explicit link between the promotion of hedonistic alternative lifestyles as a strategy suggested by powerful Jewish figures to curb the population growth of the (then predominantly white) American population.

In this regard, hardcore pornography has unquestionably normalized sodomy and created the perception of sexuality as primarily recreational, divorcing it from its procreative function entirely. Further, studies even suggest there may be a correlation between pornography consumption and the rise of alternative sexual orientations. Of course, this suggestion isn’t new; the President’s Commission on Obscenity and Pornography in the 1970s recommended against restricting access to pornography after concluding that frequent exposure could make people “have more tolerant or liberal sexual attitudes.”[47] Similarly, the supporters of pornography praise it not only for its purported health benefits, pointing to studies that suggest that frequent ejaculation minutely reduces the risks of prostate cancer, but also to claims that pornography makes men “more egalitarian. . . less accepting of gender-based discrimination. . . more accepting of sexual diversity. . . less stigmatizing towards homosexuality. . . [and] less religious.”

While feminism, contraception, and Hollywood seem to have killed procreative sex, pornography seems to be killing sex in general. The widespread accessibility of internet pornography is a central factor in the present sex recession (the phenomenon wherein young people appear to be having less sex than ever before) and the drastic decline in marriage rates. Jewish cultural revolutions (the New Left) and related products like pornography, all explicitly designed to break down culture and social cohesion, have produced a generation of young people incapable of forming fruitful and fertile relationships. Jews assure us that this is a good thing. As Eva Wiseman (a Jewish novelist who is very concerned about antisemitism) explains, pornography has made men more docile and less interested in physical intercourse by “deadening male libido in relation to real women.”

This is why she thinks that “disaffected young men need more pornography.”[48]

Organized Jewry engages in an enormous amount of abhorrent and destructive behavior to ensure that white society remains debased, disorganized, and therefore incapable of discriminating against Jews. As mentioned before, Jewish feminists, abortion activists, gay rights activists, and pornographers were and are principally motivated by the goal of making society safe for Jews. This is also why Jews promote multiculturalism and mass immigration (see especially David Cole’s quote, here), and even pedophilia (see here). In his recent book The Transgender Industrial Complex, Scott Howard shows that the massive movement to normalize and glorify transsexuality is manufactured by rich and overwhelmingly Jewish philanthropists who promote transgenderism because they believe it will make society resistant to fascism. Another recent example is Richard Doblin. According to the Jewish Telegraph Agency, the Jewish founder and executive director of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies dedicates “his life to promoting psychedelics as . . . an insurance policy against another Holocaust.” In many cases, this Jewish activism — alongside other Jewish influences in society — has been absolutely devastating to white civilization.

Jewish international financiers and vulture capitalists have globalized and destroyed the economy, making having families unaffordable for young people; Jewish pharmaceutical companies have drugged the heartland with opioids; Jewish immigration and refugee organizations have flooded white countries with hostile, non-white invaders. Add the normalization of obscenity and the distribution of hardcore pornography to the list of ways that organized Jewish activity has rendered white society unfit for reproduction.

Have Jews created “a crisis of reproduction for the white race” by mainstreaming pornography?

Verdict: guilty.

To “Promote Miscegenation” and “Increase the Sexual Lusts of Men of Color or Jewish Males for White Women”

According to Abrams, because “‘the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools,’ the standard porn scenario became as a result a Jewish fantasy of schtupping the Catholic shiksa.”

Repeating what he was told by Ron Jeremy, Kulich corroborates that Jews are in porn “to fuck Roman Catholic chicks” and “fulfill like every fantasy that every Jewish boy has ever had.”

Harvey Cohen has also allegedly stated: “As you’re aware, it’s a Jewish fantasy to screw gentile women. . . Besides, why would Jewish pornographers care about gentile fantasy?”

Shiksa is a Yiddish pejorative amounting to “gentile whore.” Unclean Lips: Jews, Obscenity and American Culture goes further, defining it as “‘unclean creature,’ reptile; abomination, detestation, uncleanliness.”

This attitude can be extrapolated to the broader Jewish entertainment industry, notwithstanding the enormous amount of sexual predation by Jews in other fields, such as the infamous Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking operation and its constellation of complicit Jewish modeling agents. This is doubtless one reason why Stanley Kubrick, who made esoteric Jewish elite sexual abuse cults a central topic in his films, said that “Hitler was right about almost everything.”

The Jewish Washington Football Team (formerly Redskins) owner Dan Snyder has been accused of making lewd videos of his cheerleaders and pimping them out to friends, which is one instance in a discernible trend of Jewish entertainment executives preying on “shiksa” actresses and gentile-employee cattle. Snyder allegedly told a cheerleading coach: “You better keep them skinny with big tits or I’ll fucking kill you.” Turning to Hollywood, Larry David commented on SNL about the “very disturbing pattern” of Jewish sexual harassers in the film industry. The Tablet Mag article “The Specifically Jewy Perviness of Harvey Weinstein” explains why this is, by describing Weinstein as “a character straight out of Philip Roth, playing out his revenge fantasies on the Goyim.”

But the shikses, ah, the shikses are something else again [. . .] I am so awed that I am in a state of desire beyond a hard-on. My circumcised little dong is simply shriveled up with veneration. Maybe it’s dread. How do they get so gorgeous, so healthy, so blonde? My contempt for what they believe in is more than neutralized by my adoration of the way they look, the way they move and laugh and speak.

— Philip Roth, Portnoy’s Complaint

This trend extends to Jewish pornographers as well. For instance, Ron Jeremy — whom the Jewish Daily Forward describes as “your goofy Jewish uncle” — was recently charged with 28 counts of sexual violence, following a flurry of allegations in which Jeremy is accused of violent rape and of “sexually assault[ing] a 15-year-old girl at a party in Santa Clarita.”

The porn industry is notorious for sex trafficking and for taking advantage of vulnerable people; in his essays, Luke Ford has likened the porn industry to the “white slave trade.”

Last year there was a series of cases where the rapes of kidnapped, underage girls were uploaded to and featured on major Jewish porn sites which often refused to take the videos down. Additionally, last year the owners of a porn production company, Michael Pratt and Mathew Wolfe (not confirmed to be Jewish, though the former is a common Jewish surname), were charged with multiple counts of sexual trafficking. Pratt is still at large (perhaps hiding in Israel). Several years ago, Jean-François Gariépy brought attention to a similar scandal by conducting an interview with a young white girl who was lured into hardcore porn through modeling gigs and forced into acting in interracial abuse videos. Gariépy’s interview makes it horrifically clear that the girl is being viciously exploited, as she is evidently not all there and appears to have the cognitive faculties of a child, probably due to brain damage sustained from a traumatic car accident during her childhood.

On this topic, note that Jews like Seymore Butts and Mike Kulich have specialized in the “interracial abuse” porn genre, which glorifies degrading black male on white female sexual violence. The reluctance of white female actresses to star in these films has frustrated Jewish pornographers like James Deen, who says it is “irritating and disgusting and annoying. . . It’s racist and it’s belittling and it’s keeping me from making a good product.” While this kind of “product” is less profitable, Jewish pornographers have nevertheless taken it upon themselves to normalize and promote the genre as part of a “Crusade for Racial Equality.”

In this regard, the story of Greg Lansky is also extremely telling. Greg Lansky is known as the “Steven Spielberg of porn” for his work of turning porn into what Rolling Stone describes as “high art.” Lansky has also been working to “mainstream” porn by advertising to the widest audience possible: “Adult companies need to learn to have a digestible social media presence — one that is safe for work, safe for the audience that wants to enjoy the brand. If they want to cross that border for graphic 18+ content they can click a link.” Lansky is talking about advertising his product on social media platforms, where it will reach impressionable young children. For this reason, Ad Age calls Lansky “a master of SFW marketing.”

As pointed out in a French article written by Jacky Goldberg, Lansky’s “art” is more than porn; it is a “political gesture.” What genre is the focus of Lansky’s “artistic” pornography? According to Rolling Stone, it is “interracial sex and. . . portrayals of white women being sexually dominated by well-endowed black men.” To promote this genre, Lansky has also associated himself with a variety of highly influential rappers, including Kanye West. In one publicity stunt, Lansky offered Kanye a contract to direct an interracial porn film for his brand. Lansky is “congratulated by the African-American community” for his interracial pornography, and Kanye West has publicly promoted Lansky’s pornography, which West praises as his favorite genre.

As Lansky himself stated several paragraphs above, he sees his work in the porn industry as a fight against discrimination, so his “artistic” interracial porn brand is very obviously intended to glamourize interracial sexual relationships, specifically between black men and white women (this should be contextualized alongside the massive push for interracial couples, largely black men and white women again, by Jewish advertising agencies). Of course, Lansky’s product is also frequently posted alongside anti-white hate screeds and calls to “rape white bitches” on social media platforms (more on this — graphic — here). Jack Sen also argues that the distribution of interracial abuse pornography “has encouraged a rise in violent rape perpetrated by black men against non-black women.” As shown above with the Kanye debacle, this sort of pornography is specifically marketed towards black and non-white men. How many of the African and Middle Eastern rapists that have sexually assaulted and murdered scores of white women and schoolchildren throughout America, Western Europe, and South Africa were consumers of pornographic material depicting small and very young-looking white women in schoolgirl costumes being violently sodomized by Africans? Note that earlier this year, an 18-year-old white French girl named Victorine Dartois was raped and murdered by a non-white man. The accused was found to be uploading drawings of his interracial sex fantasies on YouTube.

Do Jewish pornographers indulge their lust for white women with pornography, and use it to “promote miscegenation” and “increase the sexual lusts of men of color for white women?”

Verdict: guilty as sin.

The Aftermath

Discussing hardcore pornography is distasteful, but necessary, because of the absolutely profound influence internet pornography has on the collective consciousness of the modern world.

Today, roughly 89% of young men and 31% of young women admit to viewing hardcore internet pornography, and the average age of exposure is estimated to be 11 years old. Google Analytics shows that porn traffic increases 4,700% after school hours when kids get home from school. Pornography is so ubiquitous that exposure to hardcore pornography, including the depiction of particularly deviant and extreme fetish activity, has been identified by studies as a “normative” childhood experience. Understanding the full sociological ramifications of pornography is undoubtedly difficult considering the near impossibility of finding a control group that has not been exposed to hardcore pornography. However, it is very reasonable to assume that the porn industry is a profound influence, if not the central influence, on the formation of young people’s sexuality and their attitudes towards members of the opposite sex. And, as discussed above, the industry producing this material deliberately produces increasingly graphic, deviant, and hateful anti-white material designed to push the boundaries of the acceptable and to shock and desensitize viewers.

For instance, a still from an interracial abuse porn video featuring an actress with braces, pigtails, and a flat chest — i.e., made to look like a 13-year-old — surrounded by African men has become a viral meme that has been shared and adapted millions of times online. The meme is so ubiquitous that high school students imitate it. High school students as young as 16 have been following porn trends and uploading videos online depicting “them[selves] crushing small creatures to death while performing sexual acts” in Cape Town, South Africa.

These are just a few examples illustrating the reach and the consequences of “porn culture” on the youth. Hardcore internet pornography has been absolutely devastating to our cultural psyche. It has corrupted, defiled, and demoralized an entire generation. And the simple fact is that our Jewish friends are largely responsible for legalizing, creating, and distributing this toxic filth. They did not accomplish this by militarily occupying America, seizing the television stations, and broadcasting demoralizing pornography to the occupied civilians, just as they did in Ramallah two decades ago. They achieved this through betraying the trust of the country that rescued them from persecution in Europe and welcomed them as refugees, by manipulating its laws, and engaging in cultural warfare within a market defended by no barriers against Jewish entry. What the IDF did to demoralize the residents of Ramallah, and black operations do to demoralize Jihadi fundamentalists, has been done to the West through its entertainment industry.

Pornography — just like abortion, feminism, gay rights, and the normalization of pedophilia — is promoted by the wealthiest and most tightly organized ethnic group on the planet as a form of ethnic political activism. Jews see pornography as a tool for fighting “fascism” and social discrimination, and for making society safe for Jews. The porn industry is one branch of a large Jewish Cultural-Marxist project to deconstruct the values of white, Western civilization, to gut Western ways of constructing meaning, and to render our culture disordered and meaningless. Pornography is a weapon, a form of Jewish “cultural terrorism,” and Jews candidly admit it. Do not take my words for it. Addressing the Jewish community, Rabbi Daniel Lapin writes:

Instead of focusing on imagined enemies, we should ask whether dogmatic commitment to a secular-liberal vision is encouraging dislike for the Jewish community. Without such honest self-appraisal, Jews will become more and more disliked — not by crazed individuals but by decent Americans distressed over their rapidly deteriorating culture and the role of Jews in that agenda. It cannot escape the notice of ordinary Americans coping with the challenge of raising responsible children in a hostile world that many Jewish names and groups lead the fight for policies these Americans see as causing the country’s decline.[49]

It’s true. Decent white men everywhere are finding out.

And we are sick and tired of it.

Notes

[1] Kristoff Kerl, “Oppression by Orgasm: Pornography and Antisemitism in Far-Right Discourses in the United States Since the 1970s,” Studies in American Jewish Literature, 2020, pp. 130, 123, 124, 125, 129.

[2] Luke Ford, “Jews in Porn.”

[3] Josh Lambert, “My Son, the Pornographer,” Tablet Magazine, 2010.

[4] An anonymous user compiled a list of old newspaper articles, archived here.

[5] Alix Wall, “In ‘Circus of Books,’ A Nice Jewish Couple Finds Success in Gay Porn,” Jewish Daily Forward, 2020.

[6] Naomi Pfefferman, “A Nice Jewish Porn Star,” Jewish Journal, 2001.

[7] Ford.

[8] Robert J. Stoller, Porn: Myths for the Twentieth Century (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991), p. 153.

[9] Emily Shire, “The Jewish Porn Star Next Door,” Jewish Daily Forward, 2013.

[10] Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).

[11] Al Goldstein, I, Goldstein: My Screwed Life (New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press, 2006), p. 229.

[12] E. Michael Jones, “Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos,” Culture Wars, May 2003.

[13] Nathan Abrams, “Triple-Exthnics: Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American Porn Industry,” Jewish Quarterly, 2004.

[14] Ford.

[15] Abrams.

[16] Cited in Abrams.

[17] Michael Loewy, Georg Lukács from Romanticism to Bolshevism (London: NLB, 1979), p. 130.

[18] Patrick J. Buchanan, The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2002), p. 75.

[19] Loewy, 151-152.

[20] Wilhelm Reich, Passion of Youth: An Autobiography, 1897-1922 (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1988), pp. 6, 22, 102, 44.

[21] Wilhelm Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism (New York: Orgone Institute Press, 1946), pp. 24-25.

[22] Ibid., 168-169.

[23] Philip W. Bennett, “The persecution of Dr. Wilhelm Reich by the government of the United States,” International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 2010, p. 52.

[24] David Held, Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), 15.

[25] Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1859), p. 4.

[26] Else Frenkel-Brunswik, “The Authoritarian Personality, Studies in Prejudice Series, Volume 1” (American Jewish Committee, 1950), pp. 339-340.

[27] Cited in Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-century Intellectual and Political Movements (Bloomington: AuthorHouse, 2002), p. 158.

[28] Ibid., 162.

[29] Nathan Glazer, “New light on The Authoritarian Personality: A survey of recent research and criticism,” Commentary, 1954.

[30] Max Horkheimer, Critical Theory: Selected Essays (New York: Continuum, 2002), pp. 242, 248, 230.

[31] Kate Connolly, “Sixties hero revealed as kindergarten sex author,” The Guardian, 2001.

[32] Herbert Marcuse, Counterrevolution and Revolt (Boston: Beacon Press), pp. 93, 1.

[33] Joseph Cunningham, “Praxis Exiled: Herbert Marcuse and the One Dimensional University, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2013, p. 539.

[34] MacDonald, xxxiv.

[35] Ibid., 112.

[36] Ibid., 115.

[37] Abrams.

[38] Abrams.

[39] Jones.

[40] Tzach Yoked, “Artful Porn and anti-Semitic Threats: The Man Behind the ‘HBO of Adult Films’ Bares All,” Haaretz, 2019.

[41] Abrams.

[42] Jones.

[43] Goldstein, 2.

[44] Ibid., 196, 265.

[45] Ibid., 219.

[46] Jones.

[47] The Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1970).

[48] Eva Wiseman, “Why disaffected young men need more pornography,” GQ, 2018.

[49] Daniel Lapin, America’s Real War (New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2012).

(Republished from Counter-Currents Publishing by permission of author or representative)

Mahmoud Khalil arrest: Can the US deport a green card holder?

Experts say Khalil’s arrest is a ‘clear effort’ to silence pro-Palestinian speech in violation of First Amendment freedoms.

The contentious arrest of Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil, who played a key role in organising the pro-Palestine protests at the Ivy League campus last year, has sparked outrage and raised concerns about free speech protections in the United States.

Khalil, a 29-year-old Palestinian student, was arrested from his university residence in New York’s upper Manhattan over the weekend by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, who said they would revoke his permanent residency – popularly known as a green card – at the behest of the Department of State. Though no federal charges have been pressed against Khalil.

“This is the first arrest of many to come,” President Donald Trump wrote on Monday on his Truth Social platform, describing Khalil as “a radical foreign pro-Hamas student”.

In his first week into the presidency, Trump had pledged to deport students who joined protests against Israel’s war on Gaza that swept US university campuses last year. Students demanded universities divest from companies linked to Israel and a ceasefire to end the war that has killed more than 61,000 people, according to the Government Media Office in the Gaza Strip.

Trump has also threatened to halt federal funding for schools, colleges, and universities if they allow what he called “illegal protests”. Days before Khalil’s arrest, Trump axed $400m in federal funding to Columbia University.

So, can a green card be revoked? What kind of protections do its holders have? And how does this fit into the broader context of student protests in the US and free speech?

Who is Mahmoud Khalil?

Khalil served as the lead negotiator for the pro-Palestinian student protesters at Columbia – a role that required him to speak to university officials and the media. Before his arrest on Saturday, Khalil told the Reuters news agency that he was concerned about being targeted by the government for speaking to the press.

“Clearly, Trump is using the protesters as a scapegoat for his wider agenda [of] fighting and attacking higher education and the Ivy League education system,” he told Reuters.

Khalil’s lawyer Amy Greer told the Time magazine her client was being targeted for his political activism and opposition to Israeli policies. She added that Khalil had not committed any crime or violated the terms of his residency.

In media interviews, Khalil has said his activism has no place for anti-Semitism.

“As a Palestinian student, I believe that the liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand-by-hand, and you cannot achieve one without the other,” he told CNN last year.

“I always say that we are the lucky ones that made it here to speak for our people who are under oppression in Palestine and across the refugee camps and the Palestinian cities,” he said.

Khalil completed his master’s degree from Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs in December 2024.

He was granted a green card last year. His wife, who is a US citizen, is eight months pregnant.

The Palestinian student was born and raised in Syria, where his grandparents moved after fleeing Tiberias, now in present-day Israel. More than 750,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed by Jewish militias in the lead-up to the birth of Israel in 1948. The Palestinians remember their expulsion from their homeland as Nakba, the catastrophe.

He attended Lebanese American University, earning his bachelor’s degree in computer science, according to his LinkedIn profile.

Khalil previously worked at the British embassy in Beirut from 2018 to 2022, according to the Middle East Eye site. He was the local manager for the Syria Chevening Scholarship, a prestigious United Kingdom government scheme.

Can the US deport Khalil?

Yes, but it would face legal challenges. Despite being referred to as permanent residents and having similar rights to US citizens, green card holders are not entirely immune from deportation, and their status can be revoked for certain limited conditions, according to experts Al Jazeera spoke to.

These conditions include committing crimes, engaging in fraud, or being deemed a national security threat – and even then, the person may challenge the deportation orders in court.

However, political speech is not a valid reason for revocation, Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), said.

“Green card holders are entitled to the same First Amendment protections as US citizens,” she said. Whitson said Khalil’s arrest is a “clear effort to silence all speech in support of Palestinian rights”.

In Khalil’s case, the burden of proof rests with the government to prove that he violated US immigration laws and that he posed a national security threat.

Zaha Hassan, a human rights lawyer, said it appears that Khalil is being “singled out because of the views he holds”.

“That would violate his right to free speech,” Hassan told Al Jazeera.

Hassan said the Trump administration appears to be arguing that Khalil’s involvement in the protests and his calls for a ceasefire in Gaza amounts to support for Hamas, which is designated as a terrorist organization by the US government.

“A court will have to decide if speech that supports Palestinian freedom and human rights is the same thing as support for terrorism under the respective immigration statutes,” she said.

A federal court has temporarily blocked Khalil’s deportation. The next hearing is scheduled for Wednesday.

Jenin Younes, a civil liberties and free speech lawyer, said the government appears to be claiming that Khalil constitutes a threat to national security “on rather nebulous grounds: that the government has a policy of combating anti-Semitism around the world, and the protests at Columbia that Khalil helped organize fostered an anti-Semitic environment”.

Trump’s executive orders were designed to target alleged anti-Semitism on university campuses and even created a task force devoted to combating alleged anti-Semitic speech, which campaigners say has been used to target critics of Israel.

This speech includes “various types of criticism of the state of Israel”, Younes explained.

Khalil has not publicly said anything that would support such charges being levelled against him.

Since Khalil has not been charged with, let alone convicted of, a crime, that “cannot serve as the grounds for deporting him,” Younes said.

What protections do green card holders and foreign students have?

While green card holders have more rights than visa holders, they are not as protected as US citizens.

They can work and live permanently in the US, but certain legal infractions or government determinations can lead to deportation proceedings.

“The Trump administration seems to be testing the waters to see how far they can go in abridging civil liberties,” Hassan said. “Immigrants and vulnerable groups that have been the subject of discrimination and prejudice are easy targets in such cases.”

Foreign students, who typically hold F-1 visas, have fewer protections. They must adhere to strict immigration rules, including limits on political activity.

“There has been reporting that the administration intends to deploy AI technology to scan social media accounts of foreign students,” Hassan said. “That would facilitate the administration’s intention to go after many more individuals.”

What exactly is Khalil being accused of?

We do not know. The exact charges against him remain unclear, but US Homeland Security officials have suggested that his activism may pose a national security concern, though there is no clear evidence.

The Department of Homeland Security said “Khalil led activities aligned with Hamas” but did not charge him with a crime. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Trump administration “will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported”. However, authorities have yet to provide evidence that Khalil was a Hamas supporter.

Khalil is being held at the Central Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Jena, which Younes suggests could be a deliberate move by the government to separate him from his family as a means to “break him down emotionally”.

“I suspect the government transferred him to get before a more conservative [favorable] immigration judge. It also makes him harder to collaborate with his attorneys”, who are in the New York and New Jersey area, she said.

Jena is about 2,187km (1,359 miles) south of New York.

Accusations of anti-Semitism at Columbia

An encampment set up by student protesters on the Columbia campus last year became the epicenter of a nationwide campaign at US universities demanding that Washington stop its unconditional support for Israel, amid the devastating war on Gaza.

The protests resulted in mass arrests and student suspensions, ending in the resignation of the university’s president, Minouche Shafik, several months later.

The protests have faced allegations of anti-Semitism, but rights groups argue these claims are being used to suppress criticism of Israeli policies.

The protests focused on condemning Israel’s military actions in the besieged Gaza Strip and called for divestment from companies linked to illegal Israeli settlements that infringe on Palestinian lands. Students demanded that the university sever financial ties with organizations linked to the Israeli government and its defense industry.

Since Khalil’s arrest, the movement has shifted to include demands for his release. People have staged protests in New York, demanding his release.

More than 2.7 million people have signed a petition demanding Khalil’s release.

Is it an attack on free speech?

Khalil’s detention also raises serious ethical concerns about the limits of free speech and the role of universities when it comes to the protection of their staff and students.

Activists as well as media have been alarmed as they see the crackdown as an attack on the First Amendment protection of free speech.

The outcome of Khalil’s case could set an important precedent for other international students who participate in protests.

If the US government is ultimately successful in its mission to deport Khalil, that is a “harbinger of unprecedented authoritarian crackdowns on political speech”, Younes said.

His arrest has already created a “chilling effect on university campuses”, Whitson said, and has harmed countless students whose rights have been infringed.

“Universities have a duty to ensure free speech, freedom of protest and academic freedom,” she added.

“They should condemn the Trump administration’s sanctions against universities, permit students and academics to speak and protest according to their beliefs, and ban non-campus police from any role in ongoing protests.”

US Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib called for an immediate release of Khalil.

“We must be extremely clear: this is an attempt to criminalize political protest and is a direct assault on the freedom of speech of everyone in this country,” said an open letter signed by 13 lawmakers, including Tlaib.

“Khalil’s arrest is an act of anti-Palestinian racism intended to silence the Palestine solidarity movement in this country, but this lawless abuse of power and political repression is a threat to all Americans.”

Mahmoud Khalil arrest: Can the US deport a green card holder? | Israel-Palestine conflict News | Al Jazeera

⁴ Sanhedrin 69b says sex with a boy of younger than eight is not really sex.

⁵ Sanhedrin 55a says pederasty with a boy younger than nine is morally neutral.

⁶ Kethuboth 11b states underage boys can’t throw guilt on those who sexually assault them.

⁷ The Talmud relates how Moses ascended to heaven and there beheld Rabbi Akiba (still unborn) expounding the Torah “in a wondrous manner” (Menachoth 29b). By majority decision, the most eminent Talmudic rabbis could overturn anything Moses said. If a particular rabbi was acclaimed by his fellow Pharisees as the greatest of that generation, then “he is, by virtue of his position as chief of the courts of justice, invested with the same authority as Moses (Sifra, Deut. 1:53; R. H. 25ab). Even when they decide that left should be right, or right left, when they are mistaken, or misled in their judgment, they must be obeyed (R. H. 25a). Heaven itself kneels to the authority of the earthly court of justice…” (“Authority,” Jewish Encyclopedia, p. 337).

Analysis: The US Supreme Court ruling on Bostock v Clayton County: What you need to know about it – and what we must do now.

Bizarre ruling changes legal meaning of "sex" in Civil Rights law to include LGBT behaviors. Far-reaching effects beyond just employment.

Yes: We need to start actually resisting. This ruling is not law.

“To restate what was once self-evident to everyone, including most homosexuals themselves: men using one another as women constitutes a perversion. To my unreconstructed mind, this is as true as ever; and so far as I am concerned, it would still be true even if gay sex no longer entailed the danger of infection and even if everything about it were legalized by all 50 states and ratified by all nine Justices of the Supreme Court.”
- Norman Podhoretz, Commentary Magazine, November 1996

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in the workplace on the basis of sex, among other things. Yesterday, in Bostock v Clayton County the US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that “sex” also includes homosexuality (“sexual orientation”) and transgenderism (“gender identity”). Thus, all companies must now allow openly homosexual or transgender employees – and can be sued for “discrimination” if the employees don’t receive the treatment they claim is their right. There are no “religious exemptions.”

What does this mean to citizens?

This ruling will create a storm of employment lawsuits. But make no mistake: It will soon go far beyond employment. The absurd legal redefinition of the word “sex” to include LGBT behaviors by the US Supreme Court will soon be used to legally force that horrific agenda into every realm of society (including, of course, transgender athletics, and restrooms).

Ruling took everyone by surprise

This ruling took virtually everyone by surprise. The case seemed like an easy decision about what “sex” means. No one seriously thought the US Supreme Court would go this far. It was similar to the 2003 “gay marriage” ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court – which even the “gays” didn’t expect.

Moreover, on three occasions since 2007, Congress has considered adding “sexual orientation” to federal non-discrimination laws. But no bill has passed both houses. So instead, the Supreme Court, in true activist fashion, has decided to ignore the separation of powers and act on its own.

How did our legal system get to this point?

If we honestly look at this ruling from its logical beginning, it shouldn’t be too surprising that we’ve reached this point. This is only the latest phase in the left-leaning government officials’ re-shaping the Constitution for their own social-justice ends.

Let’s start with the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which is the focus of this ruling. Though well intentioned, it was clearly unconstitutional, as various prominent members of Congress explained at the time. For example, Senator Barry Goldwater was sympathetic to the aim of the bill. He was a founding member of the Arizona NAACP and helped integrate the Phoenix public schools and the Arizona National Guard. But he voted against it.

Goldwater (and others) insisted that according to the Tenth Amendment, the federal government has no legal right to interfere with whom people hired or fired or to whom they sold their products. That “power” lay with the states, and with the people. From a constitutional standpoint he was correct. But the emotional momentum of the time was in the other direction.

Originally, the word “sex” was not even in the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It was added to the bill near the end of debate as a “poison pill” by Southern Dixie Democrats. They hoped that including “discrimination based on sex” would make the bill offensive to most legislators and get it killed. But that didn’t work and it passed anyway. And the Civil Rights Act has opened the door to Congress passing into law whatever other nationwide social agendas it wants, generally ignoring any constitutional restraints in the process.

(Later, Phyllis Schlafly rightly fought against the “Equal Rights Amendment” because she understood how the word “sex” could be twisted in the future. We now see how prescient she was.)

Moreover, in 1964, homosexuality and transgenderism were deemed mental illnesses by every medical organization in the world (as they had been since at least the founding of our Republic). Those standards were not changed through any scientific inquiry, but through brutal campaigns of threats and intimidation starting in 1973 against medical authorities. 

Furthermore, the world’s major religions consider homosexuality and transgenderism as out of moral bounds (as the Bible says, “abominations”). All of America's founders were religious and understood that a Republic could only last if its citizens were God-fearing. (Unfortunately, on the US Supreme Court, only Justices Alito and Thomas appear to be now.)

The Supreme Court's judicial activism

This week’s bizarre US Supreme Court ruling didn’t happen in a vacuum.

The Court was never meant to be a powerful unelected body that creates and shapes laws for the country through its rulings. It was meant to be the least powerful branch that adjudicated between disputing parties. But over the years Americans have allowed it to usurp enormous power (without fighting back) – and we are living with the consequences. The Justices are now ruling without restraints.

Recent prominent examples of this judicial overreach are:

• Roe v Wade (1973) ruled that there was a constitutional right to abortion.
• Lawrence v Texas (2003) declared that sodomy laws across America were unconstitutional.
• Obergefell v Hodges (2015) declared that state marriage laws and even state constitutional amendments that defined marriage as one man and one woman were violations of the US Constitution.

All of these rulings arrogantly pushed a leftist social agenda by distorting the Constitution to a point where it became unrecognizable.

The milquetoast conservative movement

For decades, the mainstream conservative movement has meekly allowed the political and legal establishment to frame “culture war” issues in their own distorted ways. In fact, the conservatives usually participate in it and become part of the problem.

For example, we all recognize that there are males and females, blacks and whites. But in truth, there is no such thing as “gay Americans” or “transgender Americans.” There are Americans with homosexual problems, and Americans with gender-identity psychological dysfunctions. But those “orientations” or “identities” are political inventions of the LGBT movement. However, our side rarely challenges these radical concepts, but instead goes along with the charade. So the legal and political system has an easier time going forward with it.

And it appears that none of the “conservative” lawyers in this case brought up the obvious glaring Constitutional problems with Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and similar legislation. Why not? Conceding that gave up a huge part of the case.

Trump’s so-called “conservative” judges

Was the 2016 election the beginning of the era of a sane US Supreme Court? We all hoped it would be.

But President Trump’s “conservative” Supreme Court judges have been a big disappointment, to say the least.  They were, of course, recommended to him by prominent conservative groups such as the Federalist Society, which is as mushy as mud on pro-family culture-war issues.

Justice Neil Gorsuch not only voted for this ruling; he wrote the majority opinion. Recall that Gorsuch was touted as a conservative Constitutional “originalist” – one who pays close attention to the original intent. Well, not so much. If you read his majority opinion in this ruling, you will see pages and pages of utter nonsense as he vainly tries to weave a convincing legal argument out of illogical mush. It’s not even worthy of a serious analysis.

Of course, Gorsuch actually comes by his prevaricating ways honestly. As many of us observed when he was nominated, he was a member of a far-left pro-LGBT Episcopal church whose female pastor officiated “gay” marriages, according to press reports. (We wonder how Gorsuch will handle it if his daughters have disturbing encounters with "transgender" boys in their locker rooms.)

We were also betrayed by Chief Justice Roberts who voted for the ruling.

And then there’s Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Even though Kavanaugh voted the right way on this, he wrote his own dissent that concluded with this frightening tripe:

Notwithstanding my concern about the Court's transgression of the Constitution's separation of powers, it is appropriate to acknowledge the important victory achieved today by gay and lesbian Americans. Millions of gay and lesbian Americans have worked hard for many decades to achieve equal treatment in fact and in law. They have exhibited extraordinary vision, tenacity, and grit-battling often steep odds in the legislative and judicial arenas, not to mention in their daily lives. They have advanced powerful policy arguments and can take pride in today's result. Under the Constitution's separation of powers, however, I believe that it was Congress's role, not this Court's, to amend Title VII. I therefore must respectfully dissent from the [ruling].

In other words, Kavanaugh fully believes that the false concept of “gay” and “transgender” identities should ultimately be part of our laws. We can see what’s coming down the road in future rulings. And he’s one of the “conservatives.”

The other two voting against the ruling were Alito and Thomas.

Where do we go from here?

As columnist Daniel Horowitz observed today, “The ‘conservative’ legal movement, which has promoted the idea of ‘appointing better judges’ rather than fighting the entire concept of judicial supremacism, has failed miserably. This was its Waterloo.”

It’s time to adopt a completely different response to this crisis. The long string of abuses perpetrated by the Supreme Court – on prayer in the schools, abortion, sodomy laws, “gay marriage,” and now this – must be defied by citizens, their local governments, and by the states.

We must stop agreeing with far too many so-called “conservatives” who insist that Supreme Court rulings constitute “the law of the land.” There is nothing in the Constitution that remotely indicates that. The courts give opinions and rule in specific cases between disputing parties. Only Congress creates the law of the land.

We must constantly confront all judges at all levels who ignore the laws and Constitution, and simply concoct rulings to please their personal “social justice” yearnings. Impeachment, a constitutional remedy, should become part of the solution.

We must confront, in whatever matter we can, unconstitutional laws. The US Constitution was meant to work through every person – each legislator, judge, and citizen – following the laws and Constitution on his own. It was not meant that legislators would pass whatever they wanted, and then leave it up to the courts to decide what was actually constitutional.

Should bad laws and US Supreme Court “rulings” that are clearly and unambiguously unconstitutional be blindly followed? Maybe not.

Here’s the sort of defiance that there must be more of:

We’ve often said that Judge Roy Moore is the greatest pro-family figure since Phyllis Schlafly. After the ridiculous Obergefell ruling, Judge Moore (as Alabama’s Chief Justice) ordered the state’s probate judges to obey the state Constitution and refuse to issue same-sex marriage licenses. He had earlier placed a Ten Commandments monument in his court building, despite phony “separation of church and state” orders by another court.

Because of that, Judge Moore was hated by the Republican establishment, who stood by and watched as he was hideously vilified by the Left when he recently ran for US Senate in Alabama. He would have been their worst nightmare as a US Senator, boldly standing up for the truth in that political cesspool.

Don’t despair. Don’t give up. Begin fighting back.

In our daily lives, as much as possible, we all need to say NO and do what is right – and confront our officials and judges to do what is right. That is the direction MassResistance is taking – especially regarding this latest ruling. We will be discussing more of this in upcoming articles. If enough people get involved, amazing things can happen!

FRR Jan 2019 | The Plot by Gay Psychiatrists to Normalize Homosexuality

Like global warming or evolution, there is a scientific ‘consensus’ today about homosexuality: namely, that homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality. In fact, it is so ‘normal’ that any suggestion to the contrary must be suppressed, ridiculed, attacked, etc. Interestingly, this ‘consensus’ and its virulent reaction against any naysaying point to seemingly contradictory realities: (1) that the ‘truth’ about homosexuality’s ‘benign-ness’ is so solid and well-proven in the eyes of our cultural elite that no further debate or discussion is necessary; and (2) that the actual facts supporting the consensus are so weak that they dare not be challenged lest the emperor’s nakedness be exposed.

For many of our thought leaders, Reality #1 rules the day, to the extent that the history of how we got to this point can be regaled as a necessary triumph of the forces of ‘modern enlightenment’ over the ‘bigots’ of the past. A window on this history was originally broadcast in January 2002 by National Public Radio (NPR), and then re-broadcast recently on December 16, 2018 ¹. Yet while the program documents the change in American psychiatry that took place in the early 1970s leading to the 1973 de-listing of homosexuality as a mental disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) — psychiatry’s scientific ‘bible’ — it actually underscores how the change was not based on science and facts, but rather on a homosexual ‘plot,’ mixed together with quasi-rioting and moral cowardice.

Prior to the ‘Big Change,’ Dr. John P Spiegel — a gay, but closeted, psychiatrist — along with other closeted psychiatrists, made a deliberate effort to take over key positions in the American Psychiatric Association (APA). By 1973, he was President-elect of the APA, setting the stage for what was to come. Family members of Dr. Spiegel, including the NPR science reporter, considered him “a closeted homosexual with a very particular agenda.” He and some of his allies engaged in four years of illegal entry, name-calling, and terrorism at APA conventions. Finally, after an evening with homosexual activists during the 1973 convention, Psychiatrist Robert Spitzer and an official of the Gay Activists Alliance jointly composed the DSM language making homosexuality ‘normal.’

Backdrop

Dr. Spiegel, of course, was not alone. Earlier, in 1957, Dr. Evelyn Hooker also schemed with male homosexuals to ‘normalize’ them. Her study of 30 gays was designed to show that homosexuals and heterosexuals could not be distinguished on standard psychological tests. But for all but one or two of them, their homosexuality was made obvious as they ‘interpreted’ ink blots and pictures. Hooker was forced to score the way they told their stories as showing they were adequately ‘adjusted’ — something never done with such story tests before or since.

The Pill arrived in 1960, and began weakening the social-psychological bonds between sex, babies, and religion. In 1967, Black rioting in Detroit and other cities frightened the ruling class. In 1969, gays taunted police at the Stonewall bar, and New York City’s Mayor responded by refusing to enforce laws against homosexuality. San Francisco activists also saw an opening: could they achieve acceptance even while ‘being themselves?’ The 1970 APA convention in San Francisco provided an opportunity to test the notion. Gay activists stole press passes and with feathers in their hats loudly accused psychiatrists of oppression and sadism for labeling them ‘sick.’ In perhaps the first ‘insider assistance’ by Dr. Spiegel, no one at the convention had them arrested. Instead, their criminality, disruption, and name-calling were rewarded with a speaking slot at the next convention!

Seeding the Juggernaut

Homosexuals accelerated their disruptiveness at the 1971 convention in Washington, DC. They “broke into the auditorium through a stage door during the opening ceremony, and stormed the podium.” Besides name-calling, they also threatened bodily harm. Again, no arrests. Instead, they were rewarded by being permitted to have a gay psychiatrist speak at the 1972 convention. Enter ‘Dr Anonymous,’ who wore a multicolored tux, three sizes too large, a mask, and who used a mike to disguise his voice. He had spent the last few years testifying as an expert witness for gays who ran afoul of the law, so he knew how to pitch gay innocence.

‘Dr. Anonymous’ had also just been fired. As he recounted being told, “If you were gay and not flamboyant, we would keep you. If you were flamboyant and not gay, we would keep you. But since you are both gay and flamboyant, we cannot keep you” ². Meanwhile groups of angry gays followed conservative psychiatrists, yelling and protesting every paper they read. Gays made late night phone calls (including death threats — leading one conservative to carry a gun), and “scratched obscene messages into the paint of psychiatry department bathroom stalls.” Dr. Spiegel’s team apparently made sure the police were not called. Instead, Ron Gold, of the Gay Activists Alliance, got to speak at the 1973 convention.

After Gold spoke, he invited Dr. Spitzer, a member of the APA reference committee, to come to a bar filled with gay psychiatrists, where “once he got there and saw that the head of the Transactional Analysis Association and the guy who handed out all the training money in the United States, and the heads of various prestigious psychiatry departments at various universities were all there, he couldn't believe it…” According to the NPR science reporter: “And that's when it happened.… a young man in full Army uniform walked into the bar. He looked at Robert Spitzer. He looked at Ronald Gold. He looked at the Grand Dragon of the GAYPA. And then burst into tears. He threw himself into Ron’s arms and remained there, sobbing.”

Ron Gold: “Well, I had no idea who he was. It turned out he was a psychiatrist, an Army psychiatrist based in Hawaii, who was so moved by my speech, he told me, that he decided that he had to go to a gay bar for the first time in his life. And somehow or other, he got directed to this particular bar and saw me and all these gay psychiatrists. And it was too much for him. He just cracked up. And it was a very moving event. I mean, this man was awash in tears. And I believe that that was what decided Spitzer right then and there, let’s go. And of course, it was right after that that he said, let’s go write the resolution. And so we went back to Spitzer’s hotel room and wrote the resolution.”

Once the reference committee, headed by Dr. Spiegel, endorsed the change, it was sent to the board of trustees and the president of the APA, Dr. Alfred Freedman. Freedman was “one of the newly elected APA officials whose candidacy for office had been contrived and supported by” those who plotted to make homosexuality normal around Dr. Spiegel’s kitchen table. Dr. Freedman announced the decision to the world on December 15, 1973.

Moral and Professional Failure

The APA was filled with followers of Sigmund Freud, who asserted that his guru-like insights enabled ‘the best’ of interpersonal and social relationships. Yet these followers could not run an orderly convention or, more tellingly, detect the numerous gays scattered throughout their leadership!

Freud asserted his discoveries authorized him to make his clients divorce or marry as per his ‘analysis’ ³. Likewise, his APA followers felt their peculiar ‘mysterious knowledge’ meant they could tell society what to do about homosexuality. And their efforts paid off in tremendous societal change. Consider how very different the U.S. was prior to the 1970s:

1. In 1950, the U.S. Congress had examined homosexuality and concluded it was socially harmful, especially to youth;
2. In 1963, President Eisenhower ordered all “neurotics, alcoholics, and homosexuals” removed from Federal service;
3. In 1973, anti-sodomy laws existed in over 40 states; and
4. In 1973, the comprehensive study by psychiatrist Marcel Sagir and psychologist Eli Robins was released ⁴. It supported the traditional notion that homosexuals were more criminal as well as more ‘disturbed.’ For instance, gay males more frequently 1) had criminal records; 2) received ‘less than honorable’ military discharges; 3) contributed to the delinquency of a minor (15% of gays admitted such arrests vs. none for straights); 4) had been fired; 5) had attempted suicide (7% of gays vs none of straight men); 6) had been involved in prostitution; and 7) had substance abuse problems. Gays also had 8) more sex partners; and 9) more frequent psychiatric disorders.

Yet the pronouncement that homosexuality was no longer a mental disorder by a major scientific organization helped turn the tide. Too bad it was not based on any legitimate scientific evidence. In the NPR broadcast, the participants admit that the ‘normalization’ of homosexuality was part of a multi-year, long-term plot by gays and their allies. “Science” was barely mentioned (and that mention was largely bogus).

Conclusion

The pattern that started with Hooker, and flowered at the APA, appears in ‘gay pride parades’ to this day. Society must accept them as weird, rebellious, and threatening, as they are. The only major change to accommodate conventionality is the current banning of ‘Man/Boy Love’ demonstrators. But it seems probable even that ban will cease in time as homosexuality becomes ever more culturally entrenched.

When it comes to what psychiatry’s ‘bible’ has to say about homosexuality, why it changed has almost nothing to do with science, and everything to do with gay machinations combined with cowardice and emotionality. While the empirical evidence that existed in 1973 was not as damning to the gay cause as what exists today, the findings were generally the same: homosexuality is both a personal and social problem. And that is why Reality #2 — that the ‘facts’ supporting the supposedly benign nature of homosexuality are very thin soup — must be publicized and proclaimed to the maximum degree. The actual facts would expose the scientific fakers for what they really are, driven by ideology and agenda.

References

1. National Public Radio (2018), This American Life, December 16, 2018. ↩
2. Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_E._Fryer. ↩
3. Crews F (2017) Freud: The Making of An Illusion. Metropolitan. ↩
4. Saghir MT & Robins E (1973) Male and Female Homosexuality: A Comprehensive Investigation. Baltimore: Willliams & Wilkins. ↩

FRR Mar 2018 | Pedophilia By Any Other Name is Still Homosexuality

New Revelations of More Government Pressure on Tech Companies to Silence Constitutionally Protected Speech

The House Judiciary Committee recently released an 800+ page report detailing the efforts of the Biden White House to censor constitutionally protected speech and books by pressuring large tech companies. While the report covers some of the same ground as previous reporting, it adds new, damning conversations among high-ranking tech executives, as well as more censorial demands from the White House. 

And while it’s great that we are finding out about these new developments—where reporters and congressional committees can slowly extract bits and pieces of what the government demanded and how companies felt compelled to acquiesce—the American people deserve better. We need radical transparency from the government so that Americans know what the government is saying to private companies and what they are demanding be censored. 

The report, The Censorship-Industrial Complex: How Top Biden White House Officials Coerced Big Tech to Censor Americans, True Information, and Critics of the Biden Administration, shows that multiple tech companies, including Facebook, Amazon, and YouTube changed their policies—primarily around COVID-19—in response to pressure from the Biden White House. 

In emails with his top executives, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg explicitly stated that Meta’s removal of the Lab Leak theory “seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we’ll often regret it later.” Meta executives made clear that they felt compelled to change their policy to remove more COVID “misinformation” because they needed the administration to help them on other business issues, citing the “bigger fish to fry with the Administration—data flows, etc.” And doing nothing “doesn’t’ seem [like] a great place for us to be.” 

When Biden officials reached out to Amazon, its teams worked to change their policy around vaccine-critical books, citing “the impetus for this request is criticism from the Biden administration.” Amazon executives testified that they wanted to “accelerate” this policy change to be completed before a forthcoming call with the White House. Employees wrote that their work streams were “due to criticism from the Biden people.”

One week after contact with the White House, the new policy was in place, in time for the call with the White House. Further pressure from the White House promoted additional policy steps to limit certain types of anti-vax content. 

YouTube also felt pressured to change its COVID-19 misinformation policy with executives noting that assuaging the administration was important because the company, like Meta, wanted “to work closely with the administration on multiple policy fronts.” The White House staffers emphasized that their concerns were “shared at the highest (and I mean highest) levels of the White House.”

YouTube went so far as to give the administration a preview of the policy they were finalizing and requested feedback from the administration. 

These companies clearly and consistently felt the pressure from the administration to change their policies to remove constitutionally protected speech. They felt they needed to comply because they interpreted the administration’s statements and actions as implicit threats—if the companies did not censor content, then other important parts of their business would suffer the wrath of the White House. It almost reads as if the government is implying “It’s a nice business you’ve got there.” 

This approach should be concerning for everyone regardless of their political views. One could swap out the Biden administration actions on COVID-19 for the Trump administration on Black Lives Matter or pro-Palestinian speech. Most people can see the danger in allowing their political opponents to have such power. 

The left would not stand for a Trump White House secretly demanding that Facebook or YouTube remove or suppress certain Palestinian claims because they are “false,” “harmful,” or contributing to violence at campus protests. Imagine such demands being readily understood by executives at these companies as threats to their business that leave them with little choice but to comply.

Alternatively, progressives would rightly be enraged if then-President Trump had pressured Amazon or another bookstore to remove Black Lives Matter or DEI-themed books and then the store sent its new restrictive policy to Trump officials for feedback before launching it. We should apply the same standards to any administration, whether we agree or disagree with their beliefs. 

This is wrong. No matter who is in the White House and no matter what type of speech is being suppressed. 

The Supreme Court is currently reviewing Murthy v. Missouri and Vullo v. NRA, related cases of government censorship by proxy or “jawboning.” There are a variety of practical and legal considerations that can make it difficult to neatly draw the line between lawful government communications with companies and unlawful coercion and compulsion. 

Of course, the government should be able to flag illegal activity on platforms or provide useful context to companies about a given situation or user. And blatant attempts to force companies to take down protected speech are wrong. But there is a grey area in which the government may believe it is only encouraging or suggesting enforcement actions or policy changes. But how do companies perceive such pressure, especially when it is sustained, strident, and coming from multiple parts of the government? These are difficult questions to thread the needle on. Draft a narrow standard for what governments are allowed to say and companies may miss out on truly helpful information from the government. Draft a broad standard and government jawboning can continue unabated. 

Regardless of what the court decides, one of the greatest obstacles is the fact that so much of these communications—the helpful FYIs, the truly non-aggressive requests for information, persuasive conversations, belligerent demands, coded or even explicit threats—happen in secret. It takes a multi-billionaire buying a major social media company or years of investigation by a congressional committee to uncover some of what the government is doing to these companies. 

Americans’ foundational right to express themselves free from government censorship should not hang on what the government does in secret. We need a system of transparency that requires government employees to report any time they request or encourage a private company to silence, suppress, or limit speech. We already demand that government employees report all sorts of other activities ranging from contacts with the media to foreign travel. Certainly, Americans’ expressive rights are worth the minor inconvenience to government employees who will need to fill out a short form whenever they try to have a company suppress American speech. 

Such transparency has multiple benefits. First, the mere fact that government employees need to document their demands will curtail the worst sorts of government pressure. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Second, a fulsome record of government communications with tech companies can inform policymakers and courts about the different ways that government actors communicate with companies, helping them identify potential limits or restrictions that could be placed on executive communications. And third, it means that specific individuals whose speech has been silenced as a result of government communication with tech companies have the evidence they need to defend their rights in the courts. 

Americans of all beliefs, backgrounds, and politics deserve to have their expression protected from government interference. Defending this liberty requires shining a light on government communications with private companies. 

Evangelical Silence Empowers ADL 'Bullying'

Christian newsletter, "Don Bell Reports", December 27, 1991, reported that, on March 20, 1991 President Bush signed into law a Congressional Joint Resolution entitled, "A Joint Resolution To Designate March 26, 1991, As Education Day, USA". This joint resolution became Public Law 102-14. The title seems so innocuous that no one would think twice about it if they happened to just see it; however, this law is very sinister in its implications. It is typical of the New World Order Planners to devise innocent sounding words, phrases, and titles to mask their true intentions.

Public Law 102-14 states emphatically that all civilization from the beginning has been based upon a set of laws entitled "The Seven Noahide Laws". I bet you did not know this, did you? You probably believed that the Holy Bible was the basis upon which civilization was based. What are "The Seven Noahide Laws" and from whence did they come? These seven supposed universal laws, according to the Encyclopedia Americana, p. 737, state that they are "a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently, binding upon all mankind." Don Bell correctly reports that these laws originated from the mystic (and Satanic) Babylonian Talmud, which no Christian has ever accepted as inspired sacred Scripture. In fact, the Talmud is that collection of man-made interpretations of the Pentateuch (Genesis through Deuteronomy) against which Jesus railed so intensely. The Talmud was taught as being equal with God's inspired Word, even though the practical effect of its teachings were so often the exact opposite of what God had intended.

However, the Encyclopedia Americana continues its explanation of the Noahide Laws, "Throughout the ages, scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept of international law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all." This explanation leaves one to believe that both Jews and Gentiles are bound by these seven laws; however, Don Bell reports from Jewish sources that the Jew who lives according to the Torah is exempt from these seven laws. In other words, these seven Noahide Laws were meant for the Gentiles only!! They are meant to be a substitute for the Ten Commandments. At this point, we need to briefly list these seven Noahide Laws.

1. Thou shalt not engage in idol worship.
2. Thou shalt not blaspheme God.
3. Thou shalt not shed innocent blood of a human nor fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live.
4. Thou shalt not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous, or homosexual relations nor commit...rape.
5. Thou shalt not steal.
6. Thou shalt establish laws and courts of law to administer these laws, including the death penalty for those who kill, administered only if there is one testifying eyewitness (Note: The Jewish Law, found in Deuteronomy 17:6, requires the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses before one can be executed. In fact, the last sentence of verse 6 specifically states, "...he shall not be put to death on the evidence of one witness". This should be our first clue that these seven Noahide Laws are nothing more than a clever counterfeit of God's Ten Commandments).
7. Thou shalt not be cruel to animals.

The penalty for violating any of these Noahide Laws is spelled out on page 1192 of the Encyclopedia Judaica, "...violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation." Wow, in other words, if one person steps forward to accuse a Gentile of violating any one of these seven laws, that testimony alone would be enough to decapitate the accused. A person could be put to death for the flimsy accusation of being cruel to animals, and based on the lying testimony of one person!! Notice, there is no assumption of innocence until proven guilty, nor of the prosecution having to prove their case. No, on the accusation of one person, the accused may be legally decapitated.

Now that I have your attention, let us examine further Public Law 102-14, which set the Noahide Laws as the basis for International Law, (read United Nations) to which all American law must conform. This public law singles out one Jewish group for special honor, saying that they embody the principles of these Noahide Laws. This group is the ultra-orthodox Lubavitch Movement, known for its strict adherence to the smallest detail of the Talmud. This group believes their head Rabbi, Menachem Scheerson, is the prophesied Messiah, and are anxiously waiting for him to publicly proclaim his office.

This is such a small splinter religious group that very few Americans have ever heard of it; yet, the Congress and the President of the United States have declared in this law that this rabbi is "universally respected and revered" and that his Lubavitch movement has "fostered and promoted these seven Noahide Laws". Don Bell again sheds much light upon this Lubavitch Movement, when he quotes Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, the head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in 1943, writing in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, "Pharisaism became Talmudism...the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating arguments used in the Palestinian academies." In other words, the Talmudic Lubavitchers are reborn Pharisees.

Many Pharisees belonged to the Jewish occult group, the Cabal (Kabbala), Satanic through and through. We studied that the Jewish Cabal forms a most important foundational building block upon which the entire New World Order movement is based. Finally, we showed how these Pharisees could hate Jesus Christ so vehemently, even in the face of His tremendous miracles. We understood how Jesus possessed such hatred of the teachings and the hypocrisy of the Pharisees. Once we understand that the Pharisee of Jesus' day was involved in a Satanic secret society, we can understand how they could hate him so much.

We have already studied how these Pharisees originated the Unpardonable Sin. They viewed the many supernatural miracles of Jesus and believed that He was able to accomplish these miracles because He was an Adept in the Egyptian Mysteries. He could, therefore, access the power of the occult. Jesus warned them not to ascribe His power to Satan, but they continued to do so, thus committing the Unpardonable Sin. To this day, secret societies continue to teach their members that Jesus could do His many miracles because He was an Adept in the occult.

The Pharisees also succeeded in killing Jesus Christ on the basis that He blasphemed God, which is Noahide Law # 2. Remember Jesus' words, in Matthew 10:24-25, that the disciples of the Master will be treated in just the same way as the Master has been treated. I wonder if this Scripture has any bearing upon this current situation? Public Law 102-14 sets the foundation for American and United Nations Law to be established in such a way as to uphold these Seven Noahide Laws. These seven laws are a counterfeit of the Ten Commandments, and are promoted by the Neo-Pharisee occult group, the Lubavitchers. Don Bell further states that the Lubavitchers are a "Mystic" group, thus signifying that they teach the Cabal as well as the Talmud. This revelation ties them directly into the secret societies of today which are powering the drive into the New World Order, i.e., the Illuminati, the Freemasons, and the Bilderberger Group, just to name a few. Thus, it would seem natural that these secret societies would look favorably upon a Mystic Jewish group, which has its active roots in the ancient Cabal, a group which is a soul-mate to today's secret societies.

Is Satan setting the stage where Christians could be legally charged with violation of Noahide Law, Number 2, of blaspheming God? Certainly, our doctrine that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh would constitute "blasphemy against God", just as it did against Jesus. But, our punishment would be decapitation, a much more humane way to die than crucifixion. What does Scripture foretell as to the way in which true Christians will die in the Tribulation Period? Jesus reveals, in Revelation 20:4, that Christians in the Great Tribulation will be beheaded, i.e., decapitated, precisely the method proscribed by the Talmud. This is just one more instance in which the stage is apparently being set for the precise fulfillment of Biblical prophecy.

Christian, look up, for your Redemption draweth nigh. Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.

Slowly, surely, the counterfeit Old Testaments Commands Known As the Noahide Laws is being prepared to be the ultimate law of the land

Trump's Bolshevik America

He's arresting those who protest Israeli mass murder

Copyright©2025 by Independent History and Research • Revisionist History® Website

Bolshevik America: The “Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism” has detained a Palestinian-American who led the Columbia University protests against the Israeli holocaust in Gaza.

Federal agents told Mahmoud Khalil that his visa has been revoked. He’s actually a permanent resident with a green card. The Feds said that was revoked too. His attorney demanded a warrant. The agents hung up on her.

Khalil is a recent graduate of Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs. Born in Syria in 1995, he became a permanent U.S. resident and is married to a U.S. citizen.

To vigorously protest mass murder of civilians in Gaza by racist Zionists is anti-Semitic?

Many Palestinians are of Semitic heritage.

Many Israelis are not.

Talk about DEI and woke ideology: why is there no Federal government police force “tasked” to apprehend those in the US who hate and criticize Arabs?

Why is there no Federal government police force “tasked” to apprehend those who hate Christians?

Ask Trump, Congress, Elon, Mollie Hemingway, Charlie Kirk, Christopher Rufo and Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Cheka (“DHS”) agent Tricia McLaughlin confirmed that Mahmoud Khalil was arrested in front of his pregnant wife (who was herself threatened with arrest) —“in support of President Trump’s executive orders prohibiting anti-Semitism.”

Without providing evidence, the government claims Khalil “led activities aligned to Hamas.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on social media: “We will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported.”

Categorize someone as a Hamas supporter and they forfeit their rights as Americans.

Donald Trump is the last person most Americans would consider to be a Communist. However, consider these facts from history:

The first Soviet Bolshevik secret police bureau was the Cheka (Чрезвычайная комиссия —"Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution"). It was established December 20, after the October Revolution of 1917. It was the precursor to Soviet secret police agencies such as the GPU, NKVD, and KGB.

READ MORE HERE:

Trump's Bolshevik America

Jews Target Christian Bible 

"Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, especially the New Testament."

—

The Jewish Talmud,
(Shabbath 116a)

Throughout the centuries men have written and published thousands of hideous and monstrous books. In 18th century revolutionary France, the Illuminist philosopher, the Marquis de Sade, penned books that staggered peoples' imagination, volumes filled with sordid accounts of sexual debauchery, cruel sadistic tortures, and masochistic atrocities. In the years since the Marquis produced his soul-destroying stories, many other warped minds have come forth so that today, the shelves of adult and XXX-rated bookstores no doubt are stocked with countless, new accounts of savagery. Fiendish movies, such as The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Saw, Scream, and others are often based on these horrific books.

These many books and films are dangerous because they pervert and twist peoples' minds, obsessing criminals and inciting them to duplicate in real life the horrors which they see pictured in cinema.

The Most Dangerous Book

Considering the mountain of diabolical books available today, what would you estimate would be the most dangerous book of all? Which of hundreds of thousands of books now in print would you, if you could, censor or ban altogether?

Well, one powerful group of elitists in society has already chosen the book it insists is the most horrible and dangerous book on the planet. This influential group is now mounting an all-out campaign to totally remove every copy of this book off the face of the planet. Moreover, many in the group are demanding that governments everywhere ban this book and imprison anyone caught with it in their possession.

The book they most want banned and criminalized is none other than the Christian New Testament. The elitist group seeking its destruction and removal from society? I refer, of course, to the Jews and to their Judaizer-Gentile/Atheist/New Age fellow travelers. Yes, the Jews are enraged that the New Testament even exists.

The clamor from powerful Jewish lobby groups, rabbis, and Judaizers is at a peak now. From every quarter, the haters of Jesus' New Testament can be heard, slamming, defaming, and slandering the New Testament. To them, the New Testament is a vulgar literary production, responsible for mass murder and hatred on an unparalleled scale. It is, they allege, "bigoted, hateful, anti-Semitic, and dangerous." The New Testament must be done away with...and soon.

According to the Zionists and many Judaizers, the words of the New Testament were the inspiration for Hitler's Nazi holocaust and for persecution of the Jews throughout the centuries. Eliminate this hateful Christian book and, Presto! anti-Semitism will vanish forever. Of course, if the New Testament goes off the world stage, Jesus' coming as Christ and Lord will also be gone forever, many Jews reason. "Even better," say the chief rabbis: "Be gone Jesus!"

The Jews who despise the New Testament hold as their own authority The Jewish Talmud. The Jewish Talmud is virulent in its despising of any and all Christian books. We read: "Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, especially the New Testament." (Shabbath 116a). This directive in the Talmud is over a millenium old, so the Jewish disdain for the New Testament is not new. But the shrill attacks of the Jews are escalating now that Judaizers like San Antonio's "Christian-Zionist" Pastor John Hagee and his ilk are around.

The ADL, a premier Jewish lobby now in bed with the FBI, the Israeli Mossad, and other Big Brother groups, is only one of the many Jewish lobby organizations targeting the New Testament. Abraham Foxman, the director of the sinister ADL, suggests in his book, Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism, that the New Testament, because it accuses the Jews of guilt in the crucifixion of Jesus, is responsible for six million Jews dying in the holocaust during World War II.

Revealed: Why Do They Hate the New Testament?

Foxman's complaints about the New Testament's truthful account of Jewish complicity in Jesus' crucifixion gives us insight into the real reason why the Jews so despise the Word of God. The New Testament records that when the Roman Governor Pilate offered to free Jesus, finding him an innocent man, the Jewish throng would have none of it. "Then answered all the people and said, His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

Jews everywhere seethe with anger when they read these words of truth found in God's Word. Rather than responding with repentance and sorrow, they arrogantly seek to rip from peoples' hands the one book that indicts the Jews for their hardness of heart: The Christian New Testament.

The Jewish Book Club recently offered to its audience a book entitled, Antisemitism in the New Testament. The author of this book, Lillian Freudmann, viciously attacks the New Testament, alleging that it is an ugly, hateful book of non-truth, saturated with anti-Semitism, written and compiled by Jew-haters. If Christians, however, will atone and de-antisemitize the New Testament—in other words, revise and eliminate scores of passages—the author sees a bright future for relationships between Jews and Christians.

Simple, right? Just apologize for and erase a good part of God's Word, and all is forgiven by the Jews! Of course, the sordid and monstrous Jewish holy book, The Talmud, will keep intact its hundreds of poisonous pages in which Jesus our Lord and his teachings are so terribly maligned and blasphemed. Then and only then will the Jews let the Christians off the hook.

Freudmann also writes that in addition to removing all passages from the New Testament that offend the Jews, Judaism, the religion of the Talmud, must be accepted by the Christian Church as a "legitimate religion."

Foxman's ADL and other critics also protest the clear teachings in the New Testament that homosexuality is a sin and an affront to God. Again, they accuse the New Testament of being a bigoted, hateful document.

Christian Judaizers Attack the Bible

Even so-called "Christian" Jews, often identifying themselves as "Messianic Jews," have been known to slander the Holy Bible. Arnold Fruchtenbaum, a leading Messianic Jew, declares that the KJV Bible's teachings in the book of Daniel (Old Testament) indicating that the antichrist will be a Jew mean that the King James Version is "mistranslated." No way, he says, the glorious Jewish race could produce the antichrist. The New Testament has these same teachings. Must it also be changed to please the Jews?

Monte Judah, yet another "Christian" Jewish leader, doubts much of the New Testament is valid because it elevates the New Covenant and diminishes the importance of the Jewish Temple and what he believes is the superiority of Judaic practices. Surely, Judah suggests, the Apostle Paul's writings are off-base and just plain unholy. The Jews' Old Covenant and the primacy of the Temple must be maintained, Judah insists.

Arno Froese, head of yet another Zionist-oriented group, a Gentile who is a rabid Judaizer, teaches that Jews should not be evangelized. He also attacks the King James Bible and all modern New Testaments because, he says, they are based on "pagan language," that is, they are translated from ancient Greek manuscripts. Only the Hebrew language is pure, he asserts. Therefore, the New Testament cannot be inerrant.

New Versions to Replace God's True Word

To accommodate the homosexuals, the ADL and other powerful Zionist groups, as well as Judaizer critics of the New Testament, modern Bible publishers are now putting out a slew of "New Versions." Eventually, other than the KJV, which they steadily attack and remove from book shelves, there will not be a Bible found anywhere on earth that has not been edited and changed to suit and fit the tastes of the Jews and homosexuals. Entire chapters and passages are being ripped out, modified, corrected, as newer versions are produced.

It is shocking to discover how many parts of the traditional Bible are fast being discarded in the furious assault of the Zionists and Judaizers. Take for example, Jesus words in "The Lord's Prayer." In the Gospel of Luke (Chapter 11:2-4) in the traditional King James Version, the first line reads, "Our Father which art in heaven..."

Now, here is the wording in the newer NIV Version: "Father" That's it—"Father!" The four words "which art in heaven" are missing in the NIV. Why? Because the Jews and Judaism emphasize the here and now; an earthly kingdom is their fanatical goal. They could care less about any Father in a place called heaven. The Jews want riches and rewards now, so the newer Bible versions must be modified to please the Masters of Judaism. Thus, the new versions omit the "undesirable" verses and words.

Criminalizing God's Holy Bible

If the ADL and the Zionists get their way, the entire New Testament will be banned: it will be criminalized as "hate" literature. Police SWAT teams will break down doors and search citizens' apartments and homes looking for the outlawed, contraband New Testaments. Copies found will be heaped together and publicly burned. Resisters will go off in chains to Gulags. Shades of the frightening scenes depicted in the classic movie, Fahrenheit 451.

"Bible burning?" skeptics may say, "Come on Texe Marrs, you're way over the top. Ha Ha Ha. That will never happen."

Oh, it won't? Well, dear friends, it already is happening, today, in the nation of Israel. The Washington Times reported on a bonfire at a public school in the Israeli town of Beit Shemesh, where a teacher led students in destroying a New Testament that had been given a student free by a Christian missionary he encountered on a sidewalk. Local rabbis aided the police in searching for the culprit who gave the banned book to the student. If caught, he faces a long stretch in prison. It's a criminal offense in Israel to proselytize by passing out free New Testaments.

Enough is Enough

Dear Friends, isn't it time we stood up to the Jewish lobby, their Judaizer friends, and the homosexuals, and say, "Enough is enough. Stop attacking God's precious pure Word, the New Testament. Stop your unholy assault on Jesus Christ our Lord. No More!"

King James Bible a Major Obstacle to the New World Order

By David W. Daniels

A Google search for "New World Order" turns up thousands of references. People love to talk about the New World Order, (NWO). What do they mean?

In the simplest form, it is two things:
1. A world without God.
2. A world without reminders of God.

Prominent occultist Manly Palmer Hall was deeply into the New World Order. He wrote about the NWO —and showed what the King James Bible has to do with it.

Hall wrote about many religions. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a 33rd Degree Mason, loved Hall`s occultic, NWO teachings. Forty-seven years after Hall wrote about Masonry, he was given an honorary 33rd degree. The man had major connections and lots of money.

During World War II, over a year before the USA bombed Japan, Manly P. Hall considered how to make one world government:

"In the next ten years we will have to rebuild a world civilization. I hope for some psychologists and even philosophers to be among those appointed to administer this problem.... We will sit at a council table and figure how to iron out the troubles on the earth. ...no postwar program can be successful unless at least three and probably five generations of social conditioning goes with it."

Hall foresaw five generations of conditioning, starting in first grade, needed to "create a world capable of mental and emotional tolerance."

Now look what Hall claimed is "erroneous" thinking.

"To make things right we will have to undo much that is cherished error. The problem of revising the Bible shows how difficult it is to do this. For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct; but nobody wants it. What`s wanted is the good old King James version, every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced that God dictated the Bible to King James in English." (Emphasis mine.)

Never mind that he lied about King James Bible-believers. Catch what he said?

Who is "we"? Hall is an occultist! Who was he involved with? And what did "they" do to the Bible, from the 1840s-1940s? The only "Bible" supposedly found in the 1840s was Codex Sinaiticus. Why is an occultist, who disbelieves the Bible, concerned with "fixing" it? If he got rid of the King James Bible, what would go in its place? "Psychology can be the basic science of human tolerance..."

Psychology from grade one and teaching "tolerance" sounds like today!

Hall is right. For a new world order, you`d need people conditioned from childhood, like the Nazis conditioned German kids. (He actually wrote that, too.) And for "tolerance," you need people who will "go with the flow."

But Christians are like big, bright buoys in the water, who, Hall would say, were anchored to the "jot and tittle" of the King James Bible. So Hall hoped to "free" you from the solid anchor of the King James, so you`d "flow with" his New World Order.

In his Students Monthly Letter, Fourth Year, No. 12, Hall elaborated:

"Examine several editions of the Christian Bible.... the polyglots, and get a parallel Greek-English text.... We will discover numerous errors and alternative renderings.... Read the Vulgate, the Septuagint....  You will see the uselessness of picking phrases to pieces and trying to think in terms of 'jots and tittles.`"

It doesn`t matter what they "free" you to. All that matters to them is what they get you from: The King James Bible, God`s holy and preserved words in English.

Either trust God`s holy words, or "free yourself" —to be a slave to the New World Order. For more information, see the short video "Why the NWO Hates the KJV".

It's Not a Conspiracy Theory - It's a Fact!

Students of biblical prophecy have long identified an end-time one-world government. Developments in the last hundred years have silenced those who disbelieved it. Various detailed plans for its accomplishment have surfaced over the years and current events have played out closely according to some of the plans.

One such revelation involves a Dr. Richard Day, late professor of pediatrics at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and a former director of Planned Parenthood, who spoke of the plans of "The Order" to a group of pediatricians in 1969. Dr. Lawrence Dunegan was in the audience and prepared an audio tape from his notes in the conference.

Looking back, the plan's accurate prediction of recent developments is striking. Predictions included making abortion normal (spoken before Roe v Wade), sex education down to the youngest kids, encouraging homosexuality, limiting access to affordable health care and bringing down American preeminence in industry. Another objective was to destroy the normal family structure.

However, one of the most interesting parts of the plan dealt with Christians and the Bible: "The old religions will have to go, especially Christianity... Then a new religion can be accepted for use all over the world. It will incorporate something from all of the old ones to make it more easy for people to accept, and feel at home. Most people won`t be too concerned with religion. They will realize that they don`t need it.

"In order to do this, the Bible will be changed. It will be rewritten to fit the new religion. Gradually, key words will be replaced with new words having various shades of meaning. Then the meaning attached to the new word can be close to the old word and as time goes on, other shades of meaning of that word can be emphasized. And then gradually that word replaced with another word."

Dunegan explained, "...the idea is that everything in Scripture need not be rewritten, just key words replaced by other words. The variability in meaning attached to any word can be used as a tool to change the entire meaning of Scripture, and therefore make it acceptable to this new religion."

A classic example of this subtle change is the places in the New Testament where the word "saved" is changed to "being saved." (See Luke 13:23, Acts 2:47, 1 Cor. 1:18, and 2 Cor. 2:15.) Over one billion Catholics are taught that to claim you are "saved" is the sin of presumption. You are "being saved" and "on the road to salvation" through regular attendance at a re-sacrifice of Christ (Mass), confession of sins to a man who "absolves" them, belief in a wafer-god and worship of a virgin (Mary) goddess.

Do you see how this change shifts the meaning to fit the salvation-by-works heresy of Roman Catholicism? David W. Daniels details in his book, Why They Changed the Bible, how the modern Bibles are a product of over a century of effort to subtly bend the text toward a one-world Bible for a one-world religion. When Bible societies were first established in the early 1800s, ungodly society members succeeded in establishing polluted Greek and Hebrew texts as the foundational translation documents for not only English bibles, but all languages, both common and those used by organizations such as Wycliffe.

His book also describes how the Jesuits were central in this effort. Their goal is to get the Apocrypha included in your Bible to support more of their pagan doctrines. We are very late in this process. The present Jesuit pope is even now pushing hard for unity toward the end-times one-world religion.

THE BIBLE IS UNDER ATTACK!

Why Jewish Bibles Pervert Isaiah 7:14?

The Sole Authority of the King James Bible

… and the Corruptions in the Modern Versions

By Sam Adams, Pastor

The prophet Jeremiah said it best: “Ye have perverted the words of the living God” (Jeremiah 23:36). From the beginning of creation Satan has attacked the authority of God‘s Word with the diabolical question, “Yea, hath God said?” (Gen. 3:1-5). Over the last century he has done so through the publication of a plethora of new “bible” versions which are in fact not “versions” but perversions of the Word of God, in that they blatantly attack the person, deity and atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ and pervert the true Gospel of Christ among many other heresies. These corrupted “bibles,” which adopt as their background text an intentionally corrupted Greek text which contains thousands of deletions and substitutions from the original inspired text, include the NIV (New International Version), NASV (New American Standard Version), CEV (Contemporary English Version), the ISV (Chuck Missler’s International Standard Version), the ESV (English Standard Version) and even the NKJV (New King James Version), among virtually every other modern translation in print.  When one compares these texts it becomes clear that for the English-speaking people of the world, God has preserved His infallible and inerrant Word only in the Authorized King James Bible. lf you doubt the truth of this statement, consider the following quote from Dr. Frank Logsdon, the theologian and Bible scholar who assisted in the development of  the New American Standard Version (NASV):

“l must under God renounce every attachment to the New American Standard Version. I’m afraid I’m in trouble with the Lord... We laid the groundwork; I wrote the format; I helped interview some of the translators; I wrote the preface.  I’m in trouble; I can’t refute these arguments; its wrong, frighteningly wrong, and what am I going to do about it.

“When questions began to reach me at first I was quite offended… I used to laugh with others. However; in attempting to answer, I began to sense that something was not right with the New American Standard Version. I can no longer ignore these criticisms I am hearing and I can’t refute them…the deletions are absolutely frightening… there are so many… Are we so naive that we do not suspect Satanic deception in all of this?

“Upon investigation, I wrote my very dear friend, Mr. Lockman, explaining that I was forced to renounce all attachment to the NASV. The product is grievous to my heart and helps to complicate matters in these already troublous times… I don’t want anything to do with it. The finest leaders we have today… haven’t gone into it [(corrupted Greek text)] just as I hadn’t gone into it… that’s how easily one can be deceived”. …“[Y]ou can say the Authorized Version [KJB] is absolutely correct. How correct? 100% correct!… I believe the Spirit of God led the translators of the Authorized Version. If you must stand against everyone else, stand.”  [Reference] [Reference]

The critical difference between the Authorized King James Bible (KJB) and the modern perversions is in the Greek text from which the New Testament was translated. The KJB was translated from the Received Text or Textus Receptus (TR), which was compiled and printed in Greek by Erasmus in 1516 from the majority of Greek texts available, hence the alternate term Majority Text. The reliability of this text is based on the premise that as New Testament manuscripts were copied by hand and spread throughout Asia Minor and Europe from the 1st Century AD, the majority of copies would be reliable and errors would only occur in very few of the copies. Where the KJB differs from the modern perversions, the KJB’s readings are confirmed by thousands of scriptural quotes from the writings of early Church leaders such as Tertullian, Hippolytus, Irenaeus and Justin Martyr, dating back to the 1st century and the early church at Antioch. As God promised to preserve His word (Ps. 12:6-7, ls. 40:8, Matt. 24:35, 1 Pet 1:25), He has done so through the TR (KJB) text.

Conversely, the Satanic assault on the New Testament scriptures began even as they were being written in the 1st century (see 2 Cor. 2:17: “For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God”, and 2 Pet. 3:16: “which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction”). The modern revisionist versions were translated from the product of that assault, that being a corrupted Greek text (Westcott-Hort Text) fabricated in the 1850’s by two English spiritualists named B.F. Westcott and F.J. Hort, neither of whom were true believers in Christ. Westcott denied the deity and substitutionary atonement of Christ, and reportedly dabbled in the occult. Both men denied the inerrancy and literal interpretation of scripture. Both preferred Catholic doctrine and thus may well have had ties to the Jesuits; Hort called evangelical doctrine “perverted” and wrote to Westcott: “Protestantism is only parenthetical and temporary.” Hort praised Darwin‘s theory of evolution in writing and denied that Eden ever existed. Westcott wrote, “No one now, I suppose, holds that the first three chapters of Genesis give a literal history; I could never understand how anyone reading them with open eyes could think they did.” [“If the Foundations be Destroyed” by Chick Salliby; Word and Prayer Ministries, PO Box 361, Fiskdale, MA (p. 80)]

In compiling their Greek text Westcott and Hort followed obscure, corrupted manuscripts derived from the Alexandrian school of a 3rd century Gnostic heretic named Origen (185-254 AD), who was known for seeing the scriptures as allegory, denied the authority of the Apostle Paul’s writings and thus fathered the modern textual criticism movement, and who deliberately changed the scriptures to suit his own twisted pagan doctrines (strange blend of Gnosticism, Platonism & Mysticism). Origen‘s work resulted in the Codex Sinaiticus (a manuscript discovered in 1844 in a Mt. Sinai monastery) and Codex Vaticanus texts later adopted by Westcott & Hort, which delete and substitute key words from the Majority Text in thousands of doctrinally critical places. Footnotes in the modern “versions” deceptively refer to these as the “oldest and most reliable” manuscripts. The result of this assault is a group of modern perversions of the Word of God (NIV, NASV, Living Bible, New World (Watchtower/JW), ESV, CEV, ISV, etc.), all of which follow the Westcott-Hort text and make the same heretical deletions and substitutions. One of many dangers of these new watered-down versions is that they can be easily twisted and misinterpreted where the KJB cannot, and they can be used to support and teach false doctrines of demons. A trained and discipled Christian may read his understanding of orthodox theology into the modern versions’ revised passages, but so can heretics and New-Agers do the same with their demonic doctrines, including equating the Lord Jesus with Lucifer. Even the New King James Version (NKJ), which generally follows the TR (KJB) text, makes many of the same corruptions the other perversions make, and where it doesn’t do so it points out with footnotes most deviations from the Westcott-Hort (NIV etc.) text, which in itself causes great confusion and casts doubt on the authority and reliability of Scripture, repeating the old lie of the devil, “Yea, hath God said?”

The following sampling of some of the more crucial KJB texts that are corrupted in the new versions should be enough to convince any skeptic that the new versions do NOT present the inspired word of God, cannot be accepted as authoritative, and should not be used by Christians.

[NOTE: Emphasis added in bold in KJB quotes. Corruptions shown for the NAS (New American Standard) and NIV (New International) versions are almost always also made in the CEV, ESV, ISV, etc. (NKJ) indicates the corruption is made in the margin notes of the New King James version]:

ATTACKS ON THE PERSON OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST AND DENIAL OF HIS DEITY

1. Denial that Jesus is God

1 Timothy 3:16 – KJB:  And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
NIV, NAS, ISV, (NKJ) – change “God” to “He.“  CEV: change to “Christ came as a human”

NOTE: This subtle change completely eviscerates the verse of its otherwise huge significance and clear teaching that Christ, as fully God, became incarnate in human flesh

Jude 1:4 – KJB:  For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only LORD GOD, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
NIV – changes “Lord God” to “Sovereign and Lord.” NAS, ESV, CEV & ISV – changes “Lord God” to “Master and Lord.”

Jude 1:25 – KJB:  To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.          
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – add “through (or “because of”) Jesus Christ our Lord” after “God our Savior.” Shifts meaning of “God our Savior” from the Lord Jesus to God the Fath

Romans 14:10-12 – KJB:  But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. 11 For it is written, As l live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. 12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.
NOTE: the passage clearly teaches that Christ is God!) NIV, NAS, etc. (NKJ) change “Christ” to “God” in v. 10.  This corruption also denies the truth of Jesus’ statement in John 5:22 that all judgment has been committed unto Him. See similar change at Rev. 20:12 

Revelation 1:6-11 – KJB:  6  And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen. 8  I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty… 10  I was in the Spirit on the Lord‘s day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet, 11 Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia…
NOTE: Compare with Rev. 22:12-13, Isaiah 44:6 & 48:12; Jesus IS Jehovah of the Old Testament.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – change “God and His Father” in v. 6 to “His God and Father,” and delete the phrase “I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last” from v. 11. JW’s say v. 8 is about God the father, not the Son.

Micah 5:2 – KJB: But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.                  
NIV, CEV, ESV: changes “from everlasting” to “from ancient times”, denying Christ’s eternal existence 

2 Thessalonians 2:2 – KJB: That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of  Christ is at hand.  
(This verse shows that the NT “Day of Christ” is the OT “Day of the Lord”; that Christ is the Lord of the OT.)
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV. (NKJ) — change “Christ” to “the Lord” 

1 Corinthians 10:9 – KJB:  Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ)  change “Christ” to “the Lord” · another denial that Jesus is Jehovah of the Old Testament

1 Peter 3:15 – KJB:  But sanctity the Lord God in your hearts
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – change “Lord God” to “Christ as Lord” 

1 Corinthians 12:3 – KJB:  Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.
NKJ, NIV, NAS, CEV, ESV & ISV all change “the Lord” to “Lord.”

2. Denial of Christ’s Doctrine

The following words of Christ are deleted in the NIV/NAS/CEV/ESV/ISV (NKJ)  (words in brackets are retained)
Matt. 5:44 – “bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you…despitefully use you…”
Matt. 9:13 – “I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners”
Matt. 15:8 – “…draweth nigh unto me with their mouth…”
Matt 18:11 · “For the Son of Man is come to save that which was lost”
Matt. 19:9 – “and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.”
Matt. 20:7 – “…and whatsoever is right, that shall ye receive.”
Matt. 20:16 – “for many be called but few chosen”
Matt. 23:14 – “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer; therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation“
Mark 6:11 – “…Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city”
Mark 7:8 – “…as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things you do.”
Mark 7:16 – “If any man have ears to hear, let him hear”
Mark 8:26 – “nor tell it to any in the town”
Mark 10:21 – “[come,] take up the cross, [and follow me]”
Mark 10:24 – “[how hard is it] for them that trust in riches [to enter into the kingdom of God]”  (see V.3 ↓)
Mark 11:26 – “But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses”
Mark 13:14 – “…spoken of by Daniel the prophet…”
Luke 4:4 – “…but by every word of God”
Luke 4:8 – “and said unto him. ‘Get thee behind me Satan”
Luke 9:55 – “…ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of”
Luke 9:56 – “For the Son of Man is not come to destroy men’s lives, but to save them.”
John 6:47- “…[believeth] on me [hath everlasting life]”
1 John 5:13 – “…that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God”

3. Denial that Jesus is the Son of God

John 6:69 – KJB:  And we believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God.
NlV, NAS, CEV, ESV, ISV & (NKJ): change “Christ, the Son of the living God” to “Holy One of God.”
NOTE: This perversion makes Jesus equal to saints (1 Thes 3:13) and angels (Mt 25:31), denies that He is the Son of God, and also denies that He is the Christ 

John 9:35 – KJB:  Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him. Dost thou believe on the Son of God?
NlV, NAS, CEV, ESV, ISV & (NKJ) all change “Son of God” to “Son of Man“ 

Acts 3:13, 26 – KJB:  13 The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied him in the presence of Pilate… 26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.   
NKJ, NlV, NAS, CEV, ESV & ISV all change “Son” to “Servant” at both verses
NOTE: lf we are “no more a servant, but a son” (Gal 4:7), how much more is Jesus, the etemal Son of God, a son and not a servant? 

Acts 4:27,30 – KJB:  27 For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed… 30 By stretching forth thine hand to heal; and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy holy child Jesus.
NKJ, NIV, NAS, CEV, ESV & ISV change “holy child” to “holy servant” in both verses   

Acts 8:37 – KJB: 36 and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? 37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
NKJ, NIV, NAS, CEV, ESV & ISV all either delete verse 37 altogether or show it in brackets with a margin note that it does not belong in scripture.
NOTE: This deletion also denies the apostolic (Baptist) doctrine of Believer’s Baptism, requiring that a person believe the gospel prior to being baptized, making the Bible more palatable to Catholics and Protestants, both of which practice infant baptism.

Luke 2:33 – KJB: And Joseph and his mother marveled at those things which were spoken of him. 
NlV, NAS, CEV, ESV, ISV & (NKJ) change “Joseph and his mother” either to “his father and mother” or “his parents.” This corruption denies the virgin birth of Christ, which denies Christ’s deity. Jesus could not be both the son of God and the son of Joseph (compare Matt. 1:16).
See also Luke 2:43 – all above versions make the same change to “his parents” at this verse.

Ephesians 3:14 – KJB: For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ
NlV, NAS, CEV, ESV, ISV & (NKJ) – delete “of our Lord Jesus Christ”

4. Denial that Jesus is the Christ

Matthew 23:8 – KJB: But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – delete “even Christ”

Luke 4:41 – KJB:  Thou art Christ the Son of God. And he rebuking them suffered them not to speak: for they knew that he was Christ.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – delete first word “Christ,” retain latter

John 4:42 – KJB: …for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world.
 NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – delete “the Christ”

Acts 2:30 – KJB: …that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne.              
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – delete “according to the flesh” and change “Christ” to “one of his descendants“ NOTE: This antichrist corruption also denies that the Christ would come in the flesh; see #6 below)

Acts 19:4 – KJB: Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus                             
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – delete title “Christ” 

See same deletions of Jesus’ title Christ at John 6:69 (#2 above), Acts 15:11, 16:31, 20:21; Rom. 1:16, 16:20, 16:24; 1 Cor 5:4, 9:1,18; 16:22-23; 2 Cor 11:31; Gal. 3:17, 4:7;  1 Thes 3:11; 2 Thes 1:8, 12; Heb 3:1; 1 Jn 1:7; Rev 1:9 & 12:17, et. al.
NOTE: New-Agers teach that “Christ-consciousness” was attained by Jesus but can also be attained by others, and that another “Christ” is coming

5. Denial that Jesus is Lord

Luke 23:42 – KJB: And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom. NIV, NAS, (NKJ) – remove the title “Lord”

1 Corinthians 15:47 – KJB: The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.
NIV, NAS, (NKJ) – Remove “the Lord”

2 Corinthians 4:10 – KJB:  Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus: that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body.
NIV, NAS: Remove “the Lord”   See same deletion at1 John 1:3, 2 Tim. 4:1, Acts 19:10, 1 Cor. 16:22

6. Denial that Jesus was worshipped

Matthew 20:20 – KJB: Then came to him the mother of Zebedees children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.
NIV, NKJ change “worshipping Him” to “kneeling down” NAS changes to “bowing down”
See same change at Matt 8:2, 9:18, 15:25, Mark 5:6, & Luke 24:52  
NOTE: one of Jehovah`s Witnesses’ arguments denying the deity of Christ is their claim that Jesus was not worshipped

7. Equate Jesus with Lucifer

Isaiah 14:12-15 KJB: 12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!              
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – change “heII” to “the grave” in v. 15 and change Lucifer to either “Morning Star” (“bright morning star” in the CEV), or “Day Star” in v. 12
NOTE: “morning star” is an attribute ascribed only to the Lord Jesus, not Lucifer, in Rev. 22:16: “I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.”  Peter refers to the Lord Jesus as the “day star” in 2 Pet. 1:19.
New Agers deny that Lucifer is Satan, deny the bodily resurrection of Christ, and teach that Isaiah 14 is about Jesus, not Lucifer. Both Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses teach that Jesus and Lucifer are brothers.

8. Denial of the Incarnation of Christ (that God became Man)

I John 4:3 – KJB: And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – remove “is come in the flesh”  
NOTE: John was refuting the Gnostic heresy at this verse. Because the new perversions deny that God (Christ) has come in the flesh (1 Tim 3:16, Acts 2:30), they have to revise the antichrist test! This blatant corruption alone shows that the new perversions are antichrist.

9. Accuse Jesus of Sin

Matthew 5:22 – KJB:  But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment…
NIV, NAS, (NKJ): Delete “without a cause” – making it a sin to be angry; compare Matt. 21:12 & John 2:15, where Jesus drove out the moneychangers. Some use this passage in the new perversions to argue that Jesus sinned by being angry in this instance.

10. Denial of Christ’s role in Creation

Ephesians 3:9 – KJB: And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ.          
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – delete “by Jesus Christ”

11. Denial of Christ’s Ascension

John 3:13 – KJB: And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he than came down from heaven even the Son of man which is in heaven.
NIV, NAS, (NKJ) – delete “which is in heaven”

John 16:16 – KJB: A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again a little while, and ye shall see me, because I go to the Father.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV – delete “because I go to the Father”

CORRUPTION OF THE GOSPEL

1. Change Belief to Obedience
Rom 11:32 – KJB:  For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.
NKJ, NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, and ISV all change “unbelief” to “disobedience”
Hebrews 3:18 – KJB:  And to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to them that believed not?                       
NKJ, NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, and ISV all change “believed not” to “disobeyed”
Hebrews 4:6, 11 – KJB:  4  Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief … 11  Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.           
NKJ, NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, and ISV all change “unbelief” to disobedience at both verses.

2. Deny man’s need for salvation
Ephesians 4:6 – KJB: One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.
NKJ, NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV -: change “in you all” to “in all” (pagan pantheism; God is all and is in all)
NOTE – If God is in all, there is no need for anyone to get saved; He is already in everyone!

3. Remove the Blood Atonement of Christ
Col. 1:14 – KJB: In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – all remove “through his blood”

4. Make Salvation “Difficult”
Mark 10:24 – KJB:  And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, (NKJ): delete “for them that trust in riches”
Matt. 7:14 – NKJ & ESV change the “narrow” way to the “difficult” or the “hard” way.
2 Cor. 11:3 – KJB:  But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
NIV, NAS, (NKJ) – add “and purity of devotion” after “simplicity”
Matt. 23:23; Gal. 5:22 – NIV, NAS, (NKJ) – Change “faith” to “faithfulness”

5. Change “ls saved” to “Was Saved” (secure standing in eternal salvation changed to past event of baptism or initiation):
1 Cor. 1:2, 5; 6:11 (change are washed, sanctified, & justified to were…); Eph. 2:8 (change are saved to have been saved); etc., etc. at Col. 2:10; 2:20 & 3:1, 3 (change be risen & are dead to have been raised & died); 1 Tim. 6:12 (change art called to were called); 1 Pet. 1:23 (change being born again to have been born again); etc., etc.   NOTE: this perversion changes regeneration to a mere type of initiation rite, common to all forms of Luciferian and cultic worship

6. Remove Christ from the Gospel
Rom. 1:16 – change “gospel of Christ” to “gospel”
Rom. 15:29 – change “gospel of Christ” to “Christ”
1 Cor. 9:18 – change the “gospel of Christ” to “it”
John 6:47 – delete words “on me” from “he that believeth on me hath everlasting life”

7. Teach Baptismal Regeneration (Deny Believer’s Baptism) – Acts 8:37 is either deleted or placed in brackets with a margin note that it does not belong in scripture at NKJ, NIV, NAS, CEV, ESV & ISV

DENY THE IMPORTANCE OF GOD’S WORD

Luke 4:4 – all modern (per)versions delete “by every word of God”
Heb. 4:12 – all change “powerful” to “active”
John 21:15-17, Acts 20:28, & 1 Pet 5:2 – all modern (per)versions change “feed” to “tend” or “shepherd”

IV.  DE-MASCULINIZE GOD; CHANGE “HIM” TO “THE ONE”
Luke 10:16 – KJB: He that heareth you heareth me; and he that despiseth you despiseth me; and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV – change “him” to “the One”
Same change at Matt. 13:37; Luke 12:5; John 4:25, 6:46, 7:18, 12:45, 15:21; Acts 7:38, 10:42, 22:9; 1 Cor 15:28; Col. 3:10; Heb 5:7, 7:21; 1 Peter 1:15; Rev. 1:18, 2:1.
NOTE: All references are clearly masculine in the Greek. This revision sets the stage for global worship of the New Age mother Goddess, “the virgin“

DENIAL OF THE TRINITY

I John 5:6-8 – KJB:  This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.  7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.  8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
NIV, NAS, ESV, CEV, ISV (NKJ) – delete v. 7 completely and create a new v. 7 from part of v. 6 or v. 8
Acts 17:29, Rom. 1:20, Col. 2:9 – change “Godhead” to “Divine Nature” or “divine being”

REMOVE GOD’S NAME “JEHOVAH” where context demands its inclusion:

All modern (per)versions change Jehovah to “the Lord” at all vss. where it occurs in the KJB:
Exodus 6:3 – KJB: And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.
Psalm 83:18 – KJB: That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth.
See same change at Gen. 22:14, Ex. 7:15; Judg. 6:24; Isaiah 12:2 & 26:4 in the NKJ, NAS, NIV ESV, CEV, & ISV. Identification of God as Jehovah is taboo to ecumenical New-Agers who want a global religion and want to say we all worship the same God.

“But the new versions are easier to read!”  [not]

Many Christians prefer the new perversions thinking they are easier to read than the King James Bible. However, the KJB actually ranks easier than the new versions in 23 out of 26 comparisons on the FIesch-Kincaid grade level indicator (5th grade reading level), and in most verses is easier for children to read. ln most passages the new versions have replaced simple one-syllable words from the KJB with more complex muIti-syllabIe words, because for the new perversions to be copyrighted ($), which the KJB is not, by copyright law the publishers had to make substantial changes in text from the KJB. For example the NAS changes “new“ to “unshrunk” (Mk 2:21); “sat” to “recline at the table” (Mt. 8:11, Lk. 5:29); “good” to well pleasing“ (Mt. 11:26, Lk. 10:21); “ready“ to “opportune” (Jn. 7:6); “much people” to “considerable numbers” (Ac. 11:24, 26); “sin” to “transgression” (Col. 2:13); “sin” to “lawlessness” (2 Thes. 2:3), etc. The NKJ changes “of” to “concerning” (Ac 25:20), “boat“ to “skiff“ (Ac 27:30), “stir” to “commotion” (Ac 19:23), etc., etc. Because of the copyright laws, the new versions can never use as simple words as the King James Bible.

Some Christians object to the KJB’s use of archaic words like “thee,” “thou,“ “thine,”’ and “ye.” However, these words were used (even after they had begun to cease from English conversational use) to convey the singularity or plurality of the person(s) addressed, which IS conveyed in the Greek and Hebrew, but which is not possible using only the common English pronouns “you” or “your.” When Jesus said to the Pharisees in John 8:44, “ye are of your father the devil” we know from the KJB that he was speaking to the entire group, not just one individual. Similarly, in the KJB the singular terms “thee” and “thou” means “you alone,” and “thine“ means “yours alone” (“for thine is the kingdom” – Matt 6:13). These distinctions from the original manuscripts are lost in the new perversions. The few problems with other archaic terms used in the KJB such as “suffer” (permit), “prevent” (precede), etc. can be easily overcome with a brief education in the definitions and usage of these terms.

God takes His Word very seriously. He has even magnified his word above his name (Psalm 138:2) and expects his children to tremble at his word (Isaiah 66:5). Despite all of Satan’s efforts to destroy it, God has preserved His word. The greatest group of Bible and language scholars ever assembled rejected the corrupt Alexandrian Text available to them, and following the traditional text which God preserved through the ages, produced the King James Bible. In light of the Satanically inspired deletions and substitutions made in the new perversions, there is no excuse for any Christian who has been presented with this information to continue using any of the new perversions of God’s holy word, which has been preserved for English speaking people only in the Authorized King James Bible.

Sam Adams  •  Pastor, Independence Baptist Church  •  Ocala, Florida

Modern Bible Version Hall of Shame 2 (READ PDF HERE)

WE ONLY ARE LOSING OUR FREE SPEECH, BECAUSE CHRISTIANS WILL NOT STAND UP AND PREACH THE TRUTH ANYMORE.  WE LET OUR GUARD DOWN AND NOW THE GODLESS CHRIST-REJECTING JEWS HAVE TAKEN OVER OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM. IF YOU WANT TO RETAIN YOUR FREEDOM YOU BETTER TELL THE TRUTH! NO MATTER HOW OFFENSIVE IT MIGHT BE! DON'T TELL IT IN HATE BUT TELL IT IN LOVE! TRUTH IS HATE TO THOSE WHO HATE THE TRUTH!

“It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household?”-Matthew 10:25

“The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.”-John 7:7

“If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.”-John 15:18

Isaiah 58:1

“Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and shew my people their transgression, and the house of Jacob their sins.”

Ezekiel 3:18-19

When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand. Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

Ezekiel 33:3

If when he seeth the sword come upon the land, he blow the trumpet, and warn the people;

Ezekiel 33:4

Then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the sword come, and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head.

Ezekiel 33:5

He heard the sound of the trumpet, and took not warning; his blood shall be upon him. But he that taketh warning shall deliver his soul.

Ezekiel 33:6

But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand.